***NON-POLITICAL COVID-19 Discussion Thread***

[JakeF]

A couple of reminders...

Originally Posted by Bwana

Once again, don't come in this thread with some kind of political agenda, or you will be shown the door. If you want to go that route, there is a thread about this in DC.

Originally Posted by Dartgod

People, there is a lot of good information in this thread, let's try to keep the petty bickering to a minimum.

We all have varying opinions about the impact of this, the numbers, etc. We will all never agree with each other. But we can all keep it civil.

Thanks!

Click here for the original OP:

Spoiler!

Apparently the CoronaVirus can survive on a inanimate objects, such as door knobs, for 9 days.

California coronavirus case could be first spread within U.S. community, CDC says
By SOUMYA KARLAMANGLA, JACLYN COSGROVE
FEB. 26, 2020 8:04 PM

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is investigating what could be the first case of novel coronavirus in the United States involving a patient in California who neither recently traveled out of the country nor was in contact with someone who did.

“At this time, the patient’s exposure is unknown. It’s possible this could be an instance of community spread of COVID-19, which would be the first time this has happened in the United States,” the CDC said in a statement. “Community spread means spread of an illness for which the source of infection is unknown. It’s also possible, however, that the patient may have been exposed to a returned traveler who was infected.”

The individual is a resident of Solano County and is receiving medical care in Sacramento County, according to the state Department of Public Health.

The CDC said the “case was detected through the U.S. public health system — picked up by astute clinicians.”

Officials at UC Davis Medical Center expanded on what the federal agency might have meant by that in an email sent Wednesday, as reported by the Davis Enterprise newspaper.

The patient arrived at UC Davis Medical Center from another hospital Feb. 19 and “had already been intubated, was on a ventilator, and given droplet protection orders because of an undiagnosed and suspected viral condition,” according to an email sent by UC Davis officials that was obtained by the Davis Enterprise.

The staff at UC Davis requested COVID-19 testing by the CDC, but because the patient didn’t fit the CDC’s existing criteria for the virus, a test wasn’t immediately administered, according to the email. The CDC then ordered the test Sunday, and results were announced Wednesday. Hospital administrators reportedly said in the email that despite these issues, there has been minimal exposure at the hospital because of safety protocols they have in place.

A UC Davis Health spokesperson declined Wednesday evening to share the email with The Times.

Since Feb. 2, more than 8,400 returning travelers from China have entered California, according to the state health department. They have been advised to self-quarantine for 14 days and limit interactions with others as much as possible, officials said.

“This is a new virus, and while we are still learning about it, there is a lot we already know,” Dr. Sonia Angell, director of the California Department of Public Health, said in a statement. “We have been anticipating the potential for such a case in the U.S., and given our close familial, social and business relationships with China, it is not unexpected that the first case in the U.S. would be in California.”

It is not clear how the person became infected, but public health workers could not identify any contacts with people who had traveled to China or other areas where the virus is widespread. That raises concern that the virus is spreading in the United States, creating a challenge for public health officials, experts say.

“It’s the first signal that we could be having silent transmission in the community,” said Lawrence Gostin, director of the World Health Organization Collaborating Center on National and Global Health Law. “It probably means there are many more cases out there, and it probably means this individual has infected others, and now it’s a race to try to find out who that person has infected.”

On Tuesday, the CDC offered its most serious warning to date that the United States should expect and prepare for the coronavirus to become a more widespread health issue.

“Ultimately, we expect we will see coronavirus spread in this country,” said Nancy Messonnier, director of the CDC’s National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases. “It’s not so much a question of if, but a question of when.”

According to the CDC’s latest count Wednesday morning, 59 U.S. residents have tested positive for the new strain of coronavirus — 42 of whom are repatriated citizens from a Diamond Princess cruise. That number has grown by two since Messonnier’s last count Tuesday, although the CDC was not immediately available to offer details on the additional cases.

More than 82,000 cases of coronavirus have been reported globally, and more than 2,700 people have died, with the majority in mainland China, the epicenter of the outbreak.

But public health leaders have repeatedly reminded residents that the health risk from the novel coronavirus to the general public remains low.

“While COVID-19 has a high transmission rate, it has a low mortality rate,” the state Department of Public Health said in a statement Wednesday. “From the international data we have, of those who have tested positive for COVID-19, approximately 80% do not exhibit symptoms that would require hospitalization. There have been no confirmed deaths related to COVID-19 in the United States to date.”

CDC officials have also warned that although the virus is likely to spread in U.S. communities, the flu still poses a greater risk.

Gostin said the news of potential silent transmission does not eliminate the possibility of containing the virus in the U.S. and preventing an outbreak.

“There are few enough cases that we should at least try,” he said. “Most of us are not optimistic that that will be successful, but we’re still in the position to try.”

[PAChiefsGuy]

Originally Posted by petegz28

Meh, if I need to be the target of their rhetoric that's fine.

You are not a target at all. You constantly insult ppl for disagreeing with you so ppl insult you back.

[Donger]

Originally Posted by petegz28

I understand you're mad and doing your typical Donger DC thing. Accept the fact it has worked for some people as I have stated or don't. Go Google it if you want to know more.

I'm not mad at all. I'm pointing out your selective acceptance and/or rejection of trials based on whether you want the outcome or not. That's not objective.

As I said, it's being trialed in NYC right now. Hopefully the results are good. We'll see. But it is not fact that we have a magic pill yet. Which is what was claimed, and what I rebutted.

[petegz28]

Originally Posted by PAChiefsGuy

You are not a target at all. You constantly insult ppl for disagreeing with you so ppl insult you back.

Again, more projection from you. Take a look at every single on of your posts to me. They are laced with several insults.

You are the one insulting me every time I post something you don't agree with. Sorry to have to tell you that.

[Chief Roundup]

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla

If you wonder why self-quarantine doesn't work, there it is.

There is a special place for this worthless **** and all that are just like him. Everybody else should stay home but not him. Hope that waste of human flesh dies.

Sent from my SM-G973U1 using Tapatalk

[petegz28]

Originally Posted by Donger

I'm not mad at all. I'm pointing out your selective acceptance and/or rejection of trials based on whether you want the outcome.

As I said, it's being trialed in NYC right now. Hopefully the results are good. We'll see. But it is not fact that we have a magic pill yet. Which is what was claimed, and what I rebutted.

No one has said it was. Thus my use of the word "some" and not the words "most" or "all".

[SAUTO]

Originally Posted by Donger

I know it's way early in the day, but interestingly low numbers coming out of New York so far.

couldnt that be a product of not testing everyone showing symptoms?

[Donger]

Originally Posted by petegz28

No one has said it was. Thus my use of the word "some" and not the words "most" or "all".

The fact that you can pop some pills to clear it up, for one.

[Donger]

Originally Posted by SAUTO

couldnt that be a product of not testing everyone showing symptoms?

I'm not sure what you mean. NY is reporting 72 cases so far today. Those people have been tested.

[petegz28]

Originally Posted by Donger

I'm not sure what you mean. NY is reporting 72 cases so far today. Those people have been tested.

82 ..FYP

[petegz28]

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup

There is a special place for this worthless **** and all that are just like him. Everybody else should stay home but not him. Hope that waste of human flesh dies.

Sent from my SM-G973U1 using Tapatalk

Unfortunately for every 1 of those people we see on social media there are probably 10 running around doing the same shit

[FloridaMan88]

Yet another reason why the mandatory house arrest/mass "social distancing" measures need to end...

Isolation and anxiety over the coronavirus pandemic are taking a toll, with calls to a National Suicide Prevention Hotline call center rising 300 percent, KVLY reports.

Other suicide prevention services across the United States also have seen spikes in calls since the COVID-19 virus threw everyday life askew for millions.​​​​​

Read more here: https://www.sacbee.com/news/coronavi...#storylink=cpy

[Mecca]

Originally Posted by KCChiefsFan88

Yet another reason why the mandatory house arrest/mass "social distancing" measures need to end...

So what exactly would you have us do...

[Monticore]

Originally Posted by Donger

I'm not sure what you mean. NY is reporting 72 cases so far today. Those people have been tested.

I think they are testing less people overall so total numbers will go down.

[FloridaMan88]

Originally Posted by Mecca

So what exactly would you have us do...

Strategically target the social distancing measures towards the high risk group.

[dirk digler]

Originally Posted by Monticore

I think they are testing less people overall so total numbers will go down.

Yes I believe that is correct. I think they have given up on mass testing.