|
|
View Poll Results: On a scale, 10 being “totally” | |||
0 | 96 | 65.75% | |
2 | 16 | 10.96% | |
4 | 5 | 3.42% | |
6 | 7 | 4.79% | |
8 | 3 | 2.05% | |
10 | 9 | 6.16% | |
Yes but Mahomes is exempt | 9 | 6.16% | |
I am gay | 1 | 0.68% | |
Voters: 146. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
05-28-2020, 10:59 AM | #2 |
Rabbi Goldmann
Join Date: Nov 2012
|
I don’t mind if Mike Trout or Lebron or Pat makes $35M. Anymore than it would Tom Cruise or Beyoncé or Madonna or whoever.
But Ian Kennedy pulling down $15 large last year? Yeah. |
Posts: 87,025
|
05-28-2020, 11:03 AM | #3 |
Stroking to the SB Champs!
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Flatlands of Kansas
|
Salaries don't bother me, but how some GM's deal with their budget bugs me for sure
|
Posts: 39,354
|
1 0 |
05-28-2020, 10:59 AM | #4 |
MVP
Join Date: Dec 2012
|
3-5 years in the NFL can help set them up for future success. Power on
|
Posts: 5,994
|
05-28-2020, 11:04 AM | #5 |
Starter
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Phoenix, AZ
|
No - but it does bother me that both franchises and the league are tax exempt.
|
Posts: 792
|
4 0 |
05-28-2020, 11:13 AM | #6 |
MVP
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Driftless Region
|
Not a bit
|
Posts: 8,736
|
05-28-2020, 11:18 AM | #7 |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2002
|
In the larger sense, that the players make more because the league makes more, and the league makes more while raising ticket prices every year and forcing taxpayers to pay for their new stadiums, yes. Just on football terms, no.
|
Posts: 1,399
|
0 1 |
05-28-2020, 11:24 AM | #8 |
M-I-Z-Z-O-U
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Kansas City
|
I am not and will not ever be bothered by players getting a fair percentage of the revenue generated by the league they drive.
Yes, costs keep going up and the teams keep making more. But let's not pretend for a second that lower player salaries across the board would decrease costs for the average consumer. We could cut player salaries 30 percent across the board in all pro sports, but we sure as shit wouldn't see a 30 percent drop in costs to attend games. And that's fine. Attending the games is an experience - you pay a premium for it compared to sitting on your couch or watching from the neighborhood dive bar. |
Posts: 21,144
|
05-28-2020, 11:24 AM | #9 |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2014
|
I'll say this:
Generally no, it does not bother me. It is however pretty annoying to hear MLB players whine about pay cuts and the risk they're taking considering just about everyone in our nation is in a similar situation, but with 2-3 less zeros on the end of their numbers. Of all the sports, NFL players really are not overpaid, IMO based on the abuse their bodies take. I think baseball players are overpaid, but maybe that's because I don't care for the sport. And I don't really care if I'm watching the best MLB players, or scrubs, it all looks the same to me. NBA players are paid insane amounts, but let's face it, there simply aren't many people even capable of dribbling/shooting/jumping like that, especially at 6'6" +. They're simply genetic lottery winners. |
Posts: 1,536
|
1 0 |
05-28-2020, 11:30 AM | #10 |
I Like The Kansas City Chiefs
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Shawnee, KS
|
The top few thousand best in the world at most professions are highly compensated. Why would athletes be any different?
|
Posts: 26,103
|
05-28-2020, 11:34 AM | #11 |
Supporter
Join Date: Aug 2000
|
From a purely personal POV, people's salaries don't 'bother me.'
But what does irk me, from a philosophical standpoint, though I don't have a remedy except to point it out when asked [as here], is that society seems to have a schizophrenia about beauty of free market capitalism, where if you are entertaining us, or offering us frivolities, the sky is the limit. Dude makes a catchy song, and makes millions off it into perpetuity. That's the awesome free market rewarding value. But if people work hard to provide something that actually improves our lives [medicine, energy, surgical technology and procedures, etc], we bitch and moan every step of the way about the greed of businessmen and corporations making money off our need for their ingenuity and innovation. Basically, if you take the comprehensive long view, we are collectively sending a message that the only people who deserve unfettered wealth are the people who entertain and distract us, and the people who actually improve our lives need limitations on their earning potential because, ironically, we actually need the things they create. Which I guess is fine, so long as you don't bitch when the only thing motivated people do going forward is find new ways to entertain you in a way that enriches them. |
Posts: 95,642
|
4 0 |
05-28-2020, 11:46 AM | #12 | |
Rabbi Goldmann
Join Date: Nov 2012
|
Quote:
That’s kinda where I’m at. The optics of guys getting this kind of Jack when 39 million Americans were just thrown out of work.....it’s unseemly. Frankly we’ve seen that truck drivers and nurses and meat packers and grocery store workers are the most essential folks we have in a crisis. Alas as it’s a free market, if sports takes attendance/ad hits (and that’s inevitable), salaries will trail downward. |
|
Posts: 87,025
|
05-28-2020, 11:54 AM | #13 | |
Supporter
Join Date: Aug 2000
|
Quote:
This is partially because people in general aren't willing to do what it takes to pay them handsomely. And this is partially because that unwillingness to pay 'essential' jobs handsomely stems from the fact that, just because something is necessary doesn't make it valuable. We need 'someone' to pick vegetables, and prep food and teach kids the A,B,Cs, and transport goods across the nation. But we don't need elite or rare talent to do those things. We just need a person of average skill who is committed to showing up day after day. And we have those people as a commodity in abundance. We aren't willing to pay someone millions, or even thousands, to drive from here to there, not because we don't value the service, but because if we don't there are 100 people for each position willing and able to do the exact same thing for hundreds. We'll pay hundreds for a single ticket to see a sports star or a singer who inspires us, because they are singular talents in our estimation. Would you be willing to shell out $15-20 every time you consume a Big Mac for the satisfaction of rewarding the people who put it on a the grill, or would walk down to the next restaurant and grab a cheaper bite to eat from someone else just as 'skilled' in placing meat on a grill, then putting it on a bun? |
|
Posts: 95,642
|
1 0 |
05-28-2020, 12:12 PM | #14 | |
Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hollywood, CA
|
Quote:
TV and streaming are both the future of the NFL and will far outweigh any revenue from stadiums, concessions and parking. The NFL was already earning in excess of $8 Billion from their TV deals and they'll earn far more after new deals have been negotiated. Salaries will continue to rise for at least the next decade and probably much longer. |
|
Posts: 88,960
|
1 0 |
05-28-2020, 12:17 PM | #15 | |
Rabbi Goldmann
Join Date: Nov 2012
|
Quote:
I don’t think that’s true at all. The gate is 40-50% of sports revenue and that’s gonna take a massive hit. The MLB negotiations right now are stalled because they can’t calc what the empty seats should cost the players. |
|
Posts: 87,025
|
|
|