|
![]() |
#2 |
SUPER BOWL CHAMPIONS
Join Date: Aug 2013
|
Feels more realistic than about any I’ve seen this year.
Still would like to keep Jones over this scenario I think. Even if that’s probably unlikely. |
Posts: 26,312
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Rufus Dawes Jr.
Join Date: Aug 2000
|
Thats a lot of moving around and I'm not so sure it really makes me feel better about the long term future of the team. I think if we acquire additional picks, we are going to actually use them to add quality, controllable talent to the roster.
And why cut DOD who is young and cheap, what does it accomplish? I don't give a shit, but I don';t understand the logic of that cut. |
Posts: 17,317
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2018
|
I agree with Hoover, I don't understand the LB moves. It's almost like you meant to cut Hitchens but forgot? I like Kwiatkoski but if you sign him and bring back Ragland, how many snaps is your Rookie going to play?
I like Gross Matos and I agree a double barrelled pass rushing threat is needed if we lose Jones. Somehow, I just feel like he's not good enough to take at 11? If the Chiefs ended up with a 15-20 area pick from trading Jones, I like the idea of Kinlaw as a like for like replacement reducing the cost better I think. I also feel like Okafor is fine as a starter, and you can get situational pass rushers who you hope can develop a bit later on and let Spags use them on rotation while they learn to expand their role in the NFL. The defensive backfield looks good. I like what you've done with the O line, the offensive skill positions always seem like they are taking a step back in drafts but its kind of hard to avoid that in the next year I think. |
Posts: 2,247
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
MVP
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Michigan
|
The LB deal is that even though I would cut Hitchens as a post-June 1 guy because I think he's atrocious, I don't think KC actually does. I think they'll try to solidify the 3rd spot with a veteran and Kwiatkoski makes a lot of sense. Wilson is the guy drafted to develop and replace Hitchens next year. As for cutting DOD, don't really care either way. He sucks so if he's on the team for his relatively meaningless special teams snaps then so be it.
I don't think Okafor is fine as a starter at all. It was Ogbah who was fine as a starter. I didn't like the Okafor signing from the get go and still think it's a waste of money to have him on the team beyond this season. That said, I don't think the Chiefs will eat 4 million to save 3 with him so he's likely around at least one more year. I do hope KC retains Ogbah because he's, at worst, quality depth. I just don't know if he played himself out of being cheap enough. |
Posts: 12,436
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
SUPER BOWL CHAMPIONS
Join Date: Aug 2013
|
I think you’re selling Okafor short, Crow.
He was coming on pretty strong after getting healthy there at the end. Injuries may be a concern though. To me he’s a solid starter. Nothing spectacular but capable. |
Posts: 26,312
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
M-I-Z-Z-O-U
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Kansas City
|
I like it. If they can’t keep Jones, have to get a secondary pass rusher to make it happen so your pass rush stays diverse.
At 14, I like Kinlaw as well. He was really productive on the inside despite not having much help on his DL. |
Posts: 20,969
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|