Correlations Between Punting and Defense and Punting and Winning

[staylor26]

Originally Posted by O.city

Sure, teams have shitty contracts. Most of them are shitty teams.

If a punter doesn't have much correlation to winning, why over pay or pay one more than the minimum?

Don’t fool yourself, just about every team has a shitty contract or two.

Colquitt isn’t being overpayed like he was the last two years. I’m not defending that contract. This one is slightly above average though, and I understand why they chose to keep him around, even though I probably would’ve let him walk.

[O.city]

Originally Posted by staylor26

Don’t fool yourself, just about every team has a shitty contract or two.

Colquitt isn’t being overpayed like he was the last two years. I’m not defending that contract. This one is slightly above average though, and I understand why they chose to keep him around, even though I probably would’ve let him walk.

When you're paying guys playing a physical game like this, of course there will be contracts that don't work out. It happens.

I just wasn't sure where the hate towards kccrow was coming from. Seems he's got the data here to show what he's stating.

[staylor26]

Originally Posted by O.city

When you're paying guys playing a physical game like this, of course there will be contracts that don't work out. It happens.

I just wasn't sure where the hate towards kccrow was coming from. Seems he's got the data here to show what he's stating.

He said we were paying Colquitt 4 mil per year and continues to act like that’s the case, which is false. His contract is 12th for Punters. Not that bad at all.

He just annoys me sometimes because he thinks he knows more than the pros when he’s just another idiot on a message board like us, hence me bringing up his stupid take on Hill.

[kccrow]

Originally Posted by staylor26

He said we were paying Colquitt 4 mil per year and continues to act like that’s the case, which is false. His contract is 12th for Punters. Not that bad at all.

He just annoys me sometimes because he thinks he knows more than the pros when he’s just another idiot on a message board like us, hence me bringing up his stupid take on Hill.

I said 4 million before the contract data got posted to OTC, and I still consider it stupid to sign a punter for anything more than minimums.

You don't like my takes, then go quote the idiots at PFF that are nothing more than a bunch of Brittish douchebags sitting behind a computer desk, eating nachos and haven't so much as even played the game.

Better yet, block me. I'll be blocking your ass.