|
|
01-04-2019, 04:26 PM | #2 |
Supporter
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Compton, CA
|
Question:
Spoiler!
|
Posts: 1,560
|
01-08-2019, 08:37 AM | #3 |
In BB I trust
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Boston, Mass.
|
|
Posts: 43,125
|
01-05-2019, 09:16 PM | #4 |
Cheaterlover*
Join Date: May 2009
Location: RI
|
It was forgettably okay. Pretty to look at, horrible dialogue, clunky but effective acting. Anyone other than Momoa and it would've been worse, but he carried it off with his "big and dumb" routine. I'd rank this below the rest of the recent DC films.
|
Posts: 12,916
|
01-05-2019, 11:11 PM | #5 |
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Baka Laka Daka street
|
Atlantis > Wakanda
|
Posts: 2,682
|
01-06-2019, 11:13 PM | #6 |
Ain't no relax!
Join Date: Sep 2005
|
Meh. It was entertaining. But over the top ridiculous. Plot was pretty stupid. The underwater CGI movement was weird and made it feel cheap. Definitely not the worst DC movie though.
|
Posts: 47,700
|
01-08-2019, 08:37 AM | #7 |
In BB I trust
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Boston, Mass.
|
I liked it quite a bit, but didn't love it. Thought WW was a bit better, though maybe that's because Gal Gadot > nearly anyone else I want to watch for two hours.
I thought the zany, over the top, "comic-bookiness" of it would not please my wife, who is knee deep in all these comic book movies due to having a nerd husband and two sons, but she really liked it. |
Posts: 43,125
|
01-08-2019, 08:40 AM | #8 |
In BB I trust
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Boston, Mass.
|
It has made the most of any DCEU movie and is closing in on the $1.0 billion worldwide revenue mark. I definitely see an sequel in the future.
https://www.comicbookmovie.com/aquam...onally-a165623 |
Posts: 43,125
|
01-09-2019, 10:16 PM | #9 | |
Has a particular set of skills
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: On the water
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 79,275
|
|
|