|
07-21-2017, 09:18 AM | #76 |
Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hollywood, CA
|
|
Posts: 88,960
|
07-21-2017, 09:29 AM | #77 |
WE ARE THE CHAMPIONS
Join Date: Aug 2000
|
|
Posts: 119,529
|
07-21-2017, 02:57 PM | #78 |
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Baka Laka Daka street
|
lol same here. Can't believe I waited nearly an hour to see that pretentious / bloated crap in IMAX .
Oh and I just saw Dunkirk ...now thats more like it Nolan. What a badass masterfully done film . Best film I've seen all year and that is saying something since I've seen a lot of good ones. Dunkirk is gonna be hard to top |
Posts: 2,682
|
07-21-2017, 04:46 PM | #79 | |
A certain set of skills
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: texas
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 25,265
|
07-21-2017, 06:36 PM | #80 |
Shaken. Not stirred.
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: London
|
So I guess I have to go to Leawood to see this in 70mm
|
Posts: 65,557
|
07-21-2017, 06:44 PM | #81 |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: San Antonio Tx.
|
|
Posts: 66,914
|
07-21-2017, 06:46 PM | #82 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Baka Laka Daka street
|
Quote:
I'm thinking its a shoe in for best sound mixing. Should also get a nom for Best Picture & Director. If it doesn't then holy crap, this year is apparently loaded. |
|
Posts: 2,682
|
07-21-2017, 06:53 PM | #83 |
WE ARE THE CHAMPIONS
Join Date: Aug 2000
|
I truly despised it. From the second Batman to the third Batman to Inception to Intersteller, it seemed that Nolan was continually trying to one-up himself in the batshit crazy ridiculous plot department. The only one of the three I really liked was Inception. In that, it worked. The others were just varying shades of annoying.
Were this not a straight-up historical story, and instead another let's-see-how-far-I-can-bend-reality shitfest, I would not going to see it. |
Posts: 119,529
|
07-21-2017, 08:12 PM | #84 |
Shaken. Not stirred.
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: London
|
Has the prologue been wiped from the internet? I can't find it anywhere.
|
Posts: 65,557
|
07-21-2017, 08:38 PM | #85 |
Shaken. Not stirred.
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: London
|
Sorry to spam. Regarding 70mm showings. How do I know if it is IMAX 70mm or normal 70 mm and which should I want? The only theater in Kansas showing it in "70mm" is Leawood but it doesn't indicate if it is IMAX 70 or normal. Is one going to be any better than the other?
|
Posts: 65,557
|
07-21-2017, 08:42 PM | #86 | |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: San Antonio Tx.
|
Quote:
Im seeing it tomorrow in IMAX. But it was clearly just marked IMAX. Two other theaters were marked just 70MM. All i know is that an IMAX screen is 'boxier" and "taller" and a 70MM screen has a wider picture. |
|
Posts: 66,914
|
07-21-2017, 08:54 PM | #87 |
El Gato Gordo Loco
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Earth
|
|
Posts: 46,279
|
07-21-2017, 09:08 PM | #88 |
Shaken. Not stirred.
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: London
|
I guess what I'm trying to find out is if the 70mm would be better than normal IMAX.
|
Posts: 65,557
|
07-21-2017, 11:21 PM | #89 |
MVP
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
|
|
Posts: 14,522
|
07-21-2017, 11:34 PM | #90 |
MVP
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
|
I tried looking it up and seems like a tough call that may be highly dependent on the theater. Looks like maybe 70mm might be better if you know the theater has a decently large screen an modern enough sound. IMAX at lest seems like they have good standards for sound and if you know yours doesn't have one that was crammed into a smaller theater would be a good way to see.
|
Posts: 14,522
|
|
|