|
09-13-2019, 07:46 AM | #61 |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Jul 2009
|
Yeah I’d move a 2nd for him
Have him for 4 years for cheap and he’s a good player very versatile |
Posts: 81,588
|
09-13-2019, 07:47 AM | #62 |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2013
|
If they get this guy for a second I'll shit my pants. Its gonna be a first to start negotiations.
|
Posts: 2,410
|
09-13-2019, 07:50 AM | #63 |
SUPER BOWL CHAMPIONS
Join Date: Aug 2013
|
I’d trade a 1st for Fitzpatrick or Peterson even
We’re going to be picking 30-32 odds are, who cares about the pick. We want a Lombardi. |
Posts: 26,384
|
1 0 |
09-13-2019, 07:51 AM | #64 |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Jul 2009
|
I wouldn’t trade a first but I’d do a 2nd
Especially if you can recoup it after the season |
Posts: 81,588
|
09-13-2019, 07:52 AM | #65 |
MVP
Join Date: May 2001
Location: midtown KC
|
I think in general, you seriously consider any move that adds good young contractually controlled talent.
The reality is that we're going to be picking near the end of every round for the forseeable future. One way in which we can re-stock quality talent is in trades for guys like Fitzpatrick. He's a better player than anyone we're going to get at say, pick #64. In terms of long-term cap health, moves like this are a good idea for a team that's going to be competitive for the long haul; and if you've got Patrick Mahomes, we should be in the hunt every year. Whether they fit a glaring immediate hole or not, you seriously consider a move like this. |
Posts: 17,575
|
09-13-2019, 07:52 AM | #66 | |
11-5, baby
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Livin the dream
|
Quote:
https://deadspin.com/minkah-fitzpatr...ami-1838091409 |
|
Posts: 22,416
|
09-13-2019, 07:52 AM | #67 |
Veteran
Join Date: May 2018
|
why should we be worried about our secondary?
i mean cmon guys we held the great Gardner Minshew to only 275 yrds and 2 TDS and a mere 88% completion ratio. . and he only averaged 11 yrds per throw . . Mahomes: 75.8% 378yrds 11.5 per throw 3TDS |
Posts: 2,116
|
09-13-2019, 07:53 AM | #68 |
SUPER BOWL CHAMPIONS
Join Date: Aug 2013
|
|
Posts: 26,384
|
1 0 |
09-13-2019, 07:54 AM | #69 |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Jul 2009
|
|
Posts: 81,588
|
09-13-2019, 07:55 AM | #70 |
Hockey Town
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Kansas City, Missouri
|
Considering we are a year removed from him being a top 15 pick and performing well as a rookie, it's not a bad idea.
|
Posts: 111,283
|
09-13-2019, 07:56 AM | #71 | |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Oct 2007
|
Quote:
And Albright said they would probably settle for a 2nd. |
|
Posts: 49,659
|
09-13-2019, 07:56 AM | #72 |
sorta mod-ish
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: KC North
|
If he can be a net positive for the defense you absolutely make the trade, especially considering the control you would have over him and that contract.
|
Posts: 101,448
|
1 0 |
09-13-2019, 07:57 AM | #73 |
Starter
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Louisville
|
If you’re the fins and shopping M. Fitzpatrick, would you take Ragland and our second 2nd rounder?
|
Posts: 94
|
09-13-2019, 07:57 AM | #74 | |
MVP
Join Date: May 2001
Location: midtown KC
|
Quote:
well, I would argue that the #32 pick and the #50ish pick...isn't really all that different in terms of talent. If Spagnuolo likes the kid and thinks he fits, make the deal. If he does, it allows you future cap flexibility in a couple of spots (Fuller/HB) and adds young talent. I wouldn't think of him as a 3rd safety. I think positional flexibility is the idea here in this scheme. Think of him as a hybrid defensive back and probably like the second or third best player in the secondary. |
|
Posts: 17,575
|
09-13-2019, 07:58 AM | #75 |
SUPER BOWL CHAMPIONS
Join Date: Aug 2013
|
Fitzpatrick makes the most sense from the perspective of wanting to pay Mahomes and Jones soon. That’s harder if you go with PP.
Idk I think it’s a Veach move all day long. |
Posts: 26,384
|
1 0 |
|
|