|
10-16-2017, 10:18 AM | #46 | |
On Hiatus
Join Date: Aug 2000
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 11,612
|
10-16-2017, 10:22 AM | #47 |
Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Seattle, WA
|
IMO it was worth a challenge but it was most likely not going to get overturned, ended up not needing the timeout anyway. Should have taken the FG in the first place though
|
Posts: 2,641
|
1 0 |
10-16-2017, 10:25 AM | #48 |
#RIPAce
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: So Cal
|
3rd down call: Garbage.
Not taking the FG: Garbage. 4th down call: Garbage. Not challenging? Yeah, Garbage. That was a really bad sequence for Andy. |
Posts: 17,345
|
10-16-2017, 10:29 AM | #49 |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Jul 2009
|
The more I watch it the more it looks like he does have possession and two feet down and it's in a controlled state
|
Posts: 82,244
|
10-16-2017, 10:31 AM | #50 |
Emporer of Mongo
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Milky Way
|
I'll admit this:
I thought it was a touchdown when I saw it. It looked like a TD that was ripped out after the fact....and I do not know, still...how this rule works. I have no clue what the proper ruling is. I have a feeling, since we didnt challenge it ...and no one made a stink over it...that it was not a TD....but thats simply a guess. I'd love it if some of you drafturbator geniouses could enlighten me. |
Posts: 44,652
|
10-16-2017, 10:32 AM | #51 |
Emporer of Mongo
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Milky Way
|
And, absoluetly yes. I was horrified we didnt take the 3 points and move on.
Absolutely game losing decision, right there. |
Posts: 44,652
|
10-16-2017, 10:42 AM | #52 |
"You like to drink?"
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: "I like to drink."
|
|
Posts: 43,823
|
10-16-2017, 10:52 AM | #53 |
Plays to win the game!
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Lees Summit
|
The thing that burns me is the no call for challenge. Let the Refs decide the catch, maybe they give it to us and we have a chance. Taking it away wasn't egregious, but I would waste a timeout to at least try to get 7 points, instead of lose by 6.
|
Posts: 7,661
|
1 0 |
10-16-2017, 11:03 AM | #54 |
Rock Chalk Jayhawks! KU!!!
Join Date: Aug 2005
|
|
Posts: 1,185
|
10-16-2017, 11:06 AM | #55 |
Rock Chalk Jayhawks! KU!!!
Join Date: Aug 2005
|
|
Posts: 1,185
|
10-16-2017, 11:16 AM | #56 |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2006
|
So is this correct? if it is ruled a score it gets automatically reviewed but if ruled not a score the coach has to challenge?
|
Posts: 4,265
|
10-16-2017, 11:22 AM | #57 |
Starter
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: New Jersey
|
Not challenging this play is dumb. Its an extremely controversial play that you want the refs to determine the outcome of after a second look...
|
Posts: 86
|
10-16-2017, 11:25 AM | #58 |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Mar 2007
|
How can anyone be mad that Reid was aggressive and went for 7?
People kill him all prior years for being too conservative, settling for FG's, having no sense of urgency when trying to score, etc. I love aggressive Andy. |
Posts: 22,410
|
10-16-2017, 11:26 AM | #59 | |
Grand champ
Join Date: Sep 2007
|
Let's talk about Harris's catch.
Quote:
There are times to be aggressive and times not to be. That simply was not one of them. .. and the worst part, aside from possibly costing us this game, is it’ll likely make him more gun shy later on when it actually is smart to be aggressive. |
|
Posts: 45,308
|
10-16-2017, 11:27 AM | #60 |
Be Kind To Your Pets
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Glorious Independence, MO
|
If it's Brady to Gronk, it's a TD. Smith to Harris, not so much...
|
Posts: 40,908
|
|
|