Marcus Peters also had verbal altercation with assistant coach Sunday

[Tribal Warfare]

http://amp.kansascity.com/sports/nfl...mpression=true

Chiefs cornerback Marcus Peters’ frustration following the Chiefs’ 38-31 loss to the New York Jets didn’t end immediately after the game, it appears.

According to a report by NFL Network’s Mike Garafalo, Peters also had a verbal altercation with an assistant coach on the bus during the team’s ride to airport following the game. The assistant coach was not named.

The Star reported Thursday that Peters’ suspension was related to his decision to leave the field prematurely following the flag toss. The club viewed that as a team issue, as opposed to the penalty flag toss, which it deemed a league issue that Peters was ultimately fined $24,409 for on Friday.

The NFL Network report cited Peters’ decision to leave the field as a reason for the one-game suspension coach Andy Reid levied on him earlier this week, with the verbal altercation also being a contributing factor.




The Chiefs still had a little over two minutes left to tie the game, and Peters returned to the sideline –– albeit with no socks –– as the offense made its last-gasp attempt. But the drive stalled out, and the Chiefs lost for the sixth time in seven games.

Peters’ suspension means the Oakland native will miss the Chiefs’ showdown Sunday against his hometown Raiders. He was not allowed to practice this week and will forfeit a game check.

[RunKC]

Originally Posted by O.city

Even if he doesn’t wanna sign a long term deal you can keep him for 3 more years without really sacrificing much.

He’s such a good player and what he brings is so valuable I’d wanna keep that play as long as I could

It depends on what teams would give for him. We are also about to pay a shit load of money to Chris Jones and Tyreek Hill. Reggie Ragland will need to be paid. Kendall Fuller will likely need to be paid. Kareem Hunt will likely get a new deal in 2 years to avoid a franchise tag.

We are seriously about to break the damn bank in 2 years

[O.city]

Originally Posted by RunKC

It depends on what teams would give for him. We are also about to pay a shit load of money to Chris Jones and Tyreek Hill. Reggie Ragland will need to be paid. Kendall Fuller will likely need to be paid. Kareem Hunt will likely get a new deal in 2 years to avoid a franchise tag.

We are seriously about to break the damn bank in 2 years

Can’t pay everyone but you’re also gonna have a lot of money greed up at that point so you do what you’ve gotta do.

They are gonna have to draft better to replace some of that also.

Those are some good players but none of them have produced to the level of Peters on the field yet. If he doesn’t wanna be here fine , but it’s gonna take a lot to replace his production from a value standpoint in terms of what they get back. I don’t think they’ll get a first rounder plus unless he tells whatever team that offers it he’ll sign a long term deal and even the , I’m guessing a 2nd is what they’d get

[BigBeauford]

I would only trade him for Dline starter/depth and a 1st rounder.

[RunKC]

Originally Posted by O.city

Can’t pay everyone but you’re also gonna have a lot of money greed up at that point so you do what you’ve gotta do.

They are gonna have to draft better to replace some of that also.

Those are some good players but none of them have produced to the level of Peters on the field yet. If he doesn’t wanna be here fine , but it’s gonna take a lot to replace his production from a value standpoint in terms of what they get back. I don’t think they’ll get a first rounder plus unless he tells whatever team that offers it he’ll sign a long term deal and even the , I’m guessing a 2nd is what they’d get

Yeah but I’m good with that. I’m not for keeping Peters 1 more year at franchise tag money if it means losing another talented player that wants to be here that we could extend.

If the Chiefs know they don’t want to extend Peters, then use him for another year or two and get the 2nd rd pick instead of paying franchise tag money. That’s more logical than paying him an ass load of money for 1 year and hen getting a 3rd rd comp pick.

[O.city]

Originally Posted by RunKC

Yeah but I’m good with that. I’m not for keeping Peters 1 more year at franchise tag money if it means losing another talented player that wants to be here that we could extend.

If the Chiefs know they don’t want to extend Peters, then use him for another year or two and get the 2nd rd pick instead of paying franchise tag money. That’s more logical than paying him an ass load of money for 1 year and hen getting a 3rd rd comp pick.

Not really. His 8 turnovers per year are worth what you’d pay the rage money.

3 more years, 24 turnovers and a 3rd round pick would be worth what you’d pay him

[O.city]

I would imagine Peters would wanna be wherever he’s gonna get paid.

[Shields68]

Originally Posted by Couch-Potato

Man, this would be tough to swallow. Marcus is better than an unproven first round pick. I'd need a pick + something else to feel decent about this one. Just keep him and get him a counselor please hahaha

The only difference is that with a #1 you have 5 years on a rookie deal. Peters is going to be darn difficult to keep after next year. So depending on who is available (but need LB, edge rusher or CB) and what your scouts say a decent 1 could be worth moving him.

[FloridaMan88]

Setting aside the segment of the fanbase that has an irrational hatred for Peters (mostly based on the National Anthem issue), the mindset that the Chiefs won't be able to keep Peters when he becomes a free agent and should proactively trade him is a small market/loser mentality.

You don't trade a 25 year old Pro Bowl CB shutdown corner. That is arguably the most valuable asset in today's NFL behind a young franchise QB.

[O.city]

Yeah I mean what’s a harder position to find? Qb pass rusher and corner are your big 3 spots.

Admittedly I have no idea what’s going on in the locker room or behind closed doors but on the surface, I’d pay Peters before I’d pay a rb or a wr big money simply because he’s a turnover producing corner.

Or an ILB

[threebag]

With Patty Ice to ride who needs Peters?

[The Franchise]

Originally Posted by KCChiefsFan88

Setting aside the segment of the fanbase that has an irrational hatred for Peters (mostly based on the National Anthem issue), the mindset that the Chiefs won't be able to keep Peters when he becomes a free agent and should proactively trade him is a small market/loser mentality.

You don't trade a 25 year old Pro Bowl CB shutdown corner. That is arguably the most valuable asset in today's NFL behind a young franchise QB.

BUT EMOTIONZ!!1!1!!111!

[O.city]

That stuff does matter though pest. Can’t overlook it

[The Franchise]

Originally Posted by O.city

That stuff does matter though pest. Can’t overlook it

He's had how many outbursts in his time here? I'll start worrying when he's freaking out every game and playing like complete shit. Until then....the positives are outweighing the negatives.

Now....when it comes time to give him a new deal....you can take all of that into consideration. But you don't ****ing trade him when you have him cheap for another 2 years. Let him play this year and re-evaluate at the end of this season.

[O.city]

Originally Posted by Pestilence

He's had how many outbursts in his time here? I'll start worrying when he's freaking out every game and playing like complete shit. Until then....the positives are outweighing the negatives.

Now....when it comes time to give him a new deal....you can take all of that into consideration. But you don't ****ing trade him when you have him cheap for another 2 years. Let him play this year and re-evaluate at the end of this season.

Yeah that I agree with

[Simply Red]

5. Marcus Peters, Kansas City Chiefs
20 OF 24


Coverage: 21/25
Reaction: 24/25
Recovery: 21/25
Tackling: 9/15
Position Value: 10/10
Overall Grade: 85/100

The most dangerous cornerback in the NFL resides in Kansas City. Third-year corner Marcus Peters continued on his Hall of Fame trajectory with another five interceptions, nine pass breakups and three forced fumbles. He's massively reduced the big plays he allowed in his rookie season and is seeing less targets, yet his production remains high considering the chances he's getting. The lone weakness on his resume remains his tackling effort, which is often more of a strip attempt than staying genuine in his form.

—NFL1000 DB Scout, Ian Wharton

Peters is one of the most exhilarating and frustrating boom-and-bust players in the NFL. When he's on point, he's obviously an interception machine, with the ability to see the entire field and the athleticism to jump routes that aren't even his to cover. There are also times when he'll break technique and allow big plays. The Chiefs have made a bargain with the upside of Peters' talent, knowing that the downside is also inevitable. If Peters can stay assignment-correct on every play, he has the potential to be the best pass defender of his generation.

—NFL1000 Lead Scout Doug Farrar