|
Yesterday, 12:01 PM | |
...
Join Date: Nov 2001
|
CeeDee Lamb gets paid
|
Posts: 55,187
|
Yesterday, 02:24 PM | #31 |
TACO SALAD
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: yes
|
|
Posts: 6,037
|
Yesterday, 02:43 PM | #32 |
Valiant 'The Thread Killer'
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Kansas City
|
Unless you draft a stud and convince him to sign a team friendly deal. I would be drafting a wr every year in one of the first 3 rounds.
Converting a big wr to the te position. |
Posts: 18,416
|
Yesterday, 02:44 PM | #33 |
Hockey Town
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Kansas City, Missouri
|
WR basically became the 2nd most important position in football as the rules changed.
|
Posts: 111,713
|
Yesterday, 02:52 PM | #34 |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Jan 2016
|
|
Posts: 27,324
|
1 0 |
Yesterday, 03:44 PM | #35 | |
King Shit of **** Mountain
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Texarkana, Texas
|
From a local news source here in Texas:
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 49,445
|
3 0 |
Yesterday, 04:54 PM | #36 |
THE RED MENACE
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Texas
|
Agreed, I think they will let Prescott try the open market and will only sign him if the deal is right. Someone will overpay because that's what teams do now at that position and he will be gone.
|
Posts: 32,422
|
Yesterday, 05:34 PM | #37 |
Threepeat!
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Milk/Honey/Gazland
|
Heard an on-air conversation recently saying that some are predicting that this trend is going to change because of the current plethora of WR talent in college football. Why pay a vet when you can find talented rookies for far less. Time will tell.
Last edited by T-post Tom; Yesterday at 05:48 PM.. |
Posts: 20,789
|
Yesterday, 05:45 PM | #38 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2022
Location: Cincinnati
|
Quote:
4 yrs 140M, 110M guaranteed, 40M signing bonus. I'd do that in a heartbeat. It's gonna be much higher next year.
They'll lose Tee next year for nothing more than a compensatory pick, just like they did Bates and someone else will step up into the #2 role; Iosivas or Burton. We're super deep at WR...but you know, nothing like the #1 KC Chiefs WR room. |
|
Posts: 2,394
|
1 0 |
Yesterday, 05:53 PM | #39 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2022
Location: Cincinnati
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 2,394
|
Yesterday, 05:58 PM | #40 | |
MVP
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Texas
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 17,243
|
Yesterday, 06:15 PM | #41 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2022
Location: Cincinnati
|
Quote:
When you have a pile of shit at QB, losing Watt is a big hit. Both guys change games. |
|
Posts: 2,394
|
2 0 |
Yesterday, 06:17 PM | #42 |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2022
Location: Cincinnati
|
As far as 'overpaid'. We can argue and debate all day long but the market is the market. It sets itself and you either follow or lose talent.
Revenue sharing goes up every year, cap goes up every year. That money has to go somewhere and the NFL front offices decide where it goes. |
Posts: 2,394
|
Yesterday, 06:18 PM | #43 |
Going home eventually
Join Date: Dec 2002
|
2nd most to every team but ours. Mahomes doesn't need an over paid WR. We spent money on DL and OL and it works for us.
|
Posts: 30,769
|
Yesterday, 06:21 PM | #44 | |
MVP
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Texas
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 17,243
|
2 0 |
Yesterday, 06:22 PM | #45 | |
Suupraa Geniuuusss
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Phoenix, AZ
|
Quote:
Can't look at it from KC's perspective. Mahomes is effectively a 1-of-1. That skews the entire picture from 'go.' There's no more Brady, Manning, Brees, etc. type QBs that could instantaneously elevate the play of their receivers, hell, their entire offensive units, in the league anymore. It's just Mahomes. For now, anyway. For any other team, with a mortal QB, they have to have good or great WRs to perform anywhere near the Chiefs level. It's just how it is right now. |
|
Posts: 31,336
|
|
|