|
03-15-2024, 06:58 AM | |
Starter
Join Date: Mar 2023
|
Report: Sneed likely to stay with Chiefs and play the tag
|
Posts: 934
|
03-20-2024, 07:39 AM | #406 |
Consuming CP souls
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: U.S.A.
|
|
Posts: 69,264
|
03-20-2024, 07:40 AM | #407 | |
Going home eventually
Join Date: Dec 2002
|
Quote:
We see and Snead see's a prime Ramsey or Revis. He isn't getting that value. |
|
Posts: 30,483
|
03-20-2024, 07:41 AM | #408 |
Starter
Join Date: Mar 2012
|
|
Posts: 556
|
03-20-2024, 07:58 AM | #409 | |
M-I-Z-Z-O-U
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Kansas City
|
Quote:
I'd love to have their 2025 2nd, which is going to be a top 40 pick, I'm pretty sure. But it's got to be a third this year. A 2nd in 2025 is equivalent to a 3rd round pick this year. And I'm not down with a 3rd and a 4th as a total return. Just not enough to pass up having him this year. |
|
Posts: 21,199
|
03-20-2024, 08:22 AM | #410 |
MVP
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: East Jabip
|
|
Posts: 10,940
|
2 0 |
03-20-2024, 08:26 AM | #411 |
The man you could post like.
Join Date: Oct 2010
|
Titans don't have a 3rd this year
|
Posts: 38,167
|
03-20-2024, 08:28 AM | #412 | |
Sauntering Vaguely Downwards
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Columbia, Mo
|
Quote:
But here's the thing - if you get next years 2 from Tennessee, that's converting an asset into a more fungible asset. TN's 2 next season would theoretically have solid value to any team in the NFL. Especially for teams not necessarily looking to win anything this year (i.e. teams picking higher in the 3rd). So if next year's TN pick is 'worth' a 3rd in this year's draft you could probably get it spun for an early 3rd. And with that 4th rounder from TN, you could maybe even get it converted into a late 2. It's about accumulate more readily moveable assets at that point. It's like in baseball where some teams simply always trade for pitching under the belief that EVERYONE needs a pitcher while not everyone needs a lefty slugger or a shortstop. So if you can take an asset that has strong value to 10 teams and convert it into something that has a similar value but to all 32 teams, now you're increasing your ability to get an immediate return on it. |
|
Posts: 60,963
|
03-20-2024, 08:36 AM | #413 |
Sauntering Vaguely Downwards
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Columbia, Mo
|
Just for the sake of discourse.
Let's say TN deals us a 4 this year and a 2 next year. And we take that 2 next year and flip it to NE for pick 68. Now we take the 4 from TN and bundle it with pick 68 - that gets us up to TB at 57. Which is still a little light of where I wanted to be (top 50) but not far removed. And hell, in theory you could take that 57 and combine it with our 64 to get up to SF at 600. And if you wante dto bundle that with pick 32 you could get up near 13/14 for the folks who are trying to get into the top 15. Is that the route I'd go? No - but it opens up a lot of possibilities for us when you start to distil it into straight asset value. You could hold the 57 but deal 32 to the Giants if they want a QB along with the 95 and get 47 and 70 back. Now you're holding 47, 57, 64 and 70 right in what may turn out to be the sweet spot for value picks in the draft. Again - it's not a perfect scenario at this point, but it sure would open the draft up for us. |
Posts: 60,963
|
03-20-2024, 08:55 AM | #414 |
MVP
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Helena, MT
|
Now that the Chiefs have the number of large contracts that they do, folks need to realize that draft picks represent the means by which we fill out the roster. Giving up several picks to move up is not as feasible now, because we are going to have difficulty finding the roster answers in a cost effective manager in free agency.
|
Posts: 18,571
|
4 0 |
03-20-2024, 09:13 AM | #415 | |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Jul 2009
|
Quote:
My thing is that trading up enough to get where people want them to go.....history says it just usually doesn't work out. Stay where you are, maybe go up a pick or two if a guy falls, but for the most part, just take guys you like where you are. |
|
Posts: 81,579
|
03-20-2024, 09:17 AM | #416 |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2011
|
No reason to doubt Veach in this. Breer put out yesterday that he believes it will still most likely be a second rounder. The first couple waves of FA have already come and gone. There’s no reason to rush this.
Granted it’s not an exact comparison, and we got trade raped. But Frank Clark’s value didn’t exactly go down that year when it got close to the draft. |
Posts: 2,465
|
03-20-2024, 09:34 AM | #417 |
The man you could post like.
Join Date: Oct 2010
|
Welp. Horrible situation but this may lead to some movement with Sneed.
|
Posts: 38,167
|
03-20-2024, 09:36 AM | #418 | |
MVP
Join Date: Jan 2017
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 5,456
|
03-20-2024, 09:37 AM | #419 | |
Going home eventually
Join Date: Dec 2002
|
Quote:
Sneed isn't a Chiefs yet. Tag isn't signed and maybe a team caves in after the draft when who they wanted they didn't get or he changes his contract demands but it is leaning towards him playing on the tag. Either way we are not getting the picks we want and maybe none at all. |
|
Posts: 30,483
|
03-20-2024, 09:37 AM | #420 |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Oct 2007
|
Holy ****ing shit.
|
Posts: 49,543
|
|
|