***NON-POLITICAL COVID-19 Discussion Thread***

[JakeF]

A couple of reminders...

Originally Posted by Bwana

Once again, don't come in this thread with some kind of political agenda, or you will be shown the door. If you want to go that route, there is a thread about this in DC.

Originally Posted by Dartgod

People, there is a lot of good information in this thread, let's try to keep the petty bickering to a minimum.

We all have varying opinions about the impact of this, the numbers, etc. We will all never agree with each other. But we can all keep it civil.

Thanks!

Click here for the original OP:

Spoiler!

Apparently the CoronaVirus can survive on a inanimate objects, such as door knobs, for 9 days.

California coronavirus case could be first spread within U.S. community, CDC says
By SOUMYA KARLAMANGLA, JACLYN COSGROVE
FEB. 26, 2020 8:04 PM

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is investigating what could be the first case of novel coronavirus in the United States involving a patient in California who neither recently traveled out of the country nor was in contact with someone who did.

“At this time, the patient’s exposure is unknown. It’s possible this could be an instance of community spread of COVID-19, which would be the first time this has happened in the United States,” the CDC said in a statement. “Community spread means spread of an illness for which the source of infection is unknown. It’s also possible, however, that the patient may have been exposed to a returned traveler who was infected.”

The individual is a resident of Solano County and is receiving medical care in Sacramento County, according to the state Department of Public Health.

The CDC said the “case was detected through the U.S. public health system — picked up by astute clinicians.”

Officials at UC Davis Medical Center expanded on what the federal agency might have meant by that in an email sent Wednesday, as reported by the Davis Enterprise newspaper.

The patient arrived at UC Davis Medical Center from another hospital Feb. 19 and “had already been intubated, was on a ventilator, and given droplet protection orders because of an undiagnosed and suspected viral condition,” according to an email sent by UC Davis officials that was obtained by the Davis Enterprise.

The staff at UC Davis requested COVID-19 testing by the CDC, but because the patient didn’t fit the CDC’s existing criteria for the virus, a test wasn’t immediately administered, according to the email. The CDC then ordered the test Sunday, and results were announced Wednesday. Hospital administrators reportedly said in the email that despite these issues, there has been minimal exposure at the hospital because of safety protocols they have in place.

A UC Davis Health spokesperson declined Wednesday evening to share the email with The Times.

Since Feb. 2, more than 8,400 returning travelers from China have entered California, according to the state health department. They have been advised to self-quarantine for 14 days and limit interactions with others as much as possible, officials said.

“This is a new virus, and while we are still learning about it, there is a lot we already know,” Dr. Sonia Angell, director of the California Department of Public Health, said in a statement. “We have been anticipating the potential for such a case in the U.S., and given our close familial, social and business relationships with China, it is not unexpected that the first case in the U.S. would be in California.”

It is not clear how the person became infected, but public health workers could not identify any contacts with people who had traveled to China or other areas where the virus is widespread. That raises concern that the virus is spreading in the United States, creating a challenge for public health officials, experts say.

“It’s the first signal that we could be having silent transmission in the community,” said Lawrence Gostin, director of the World Health Organization Collaborating Center on National and Global Health Law. “It probably means there are many more cases out there, and it probably means this individual has infected others, and now it’s a race to try to find out who that person has infected.”

On Tuesday, the CDC offered its most serious warning to date that the United States should expect and prepare for the coronavirus to become a more widespread health issue.

“Ultimately, we expect we will see coronavirus spread in this country,” said Nancy Messonnier, director of the CDC’s National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases. “It’s not so much a question of if, but a question of when.”

According to the CDC’s latest count Wednesday morning, 59 U.S. residents have tested positive for the new strain of coronavirus — 42 of whom are repatriated citizens from a Diamond Princess cruise. That number has grown by two since Messonnier’s last count Tuesday, although the CDC was not immediately available to offer details on the additional cases.

More than 82,000 cases of coronavirus have been reported globally, and more than 2,700 people have died, with the majority in mainland China, the epicenter of the outbreak.

But public health leaders have repeatedly reminded residents that the health risk from the novel coronavirus to the general public remains low.

“While COVID-19 has a high transmission rate, it has a low mortality rate,” the state Department of Public Health said in a statement Wednesday. “From the international data we have, of those who have tested positive for COVID-19, approximately 80% do not exhibit symptoms that would require hospitalization. There have been no confirmed deaths related to COVID-19 in the United States to date.”

CDC officials have also warned that although the virus is likely to spread in U.S. communities, the flu still poses a greater risk.

Gostin said the news of potential silent transmission does not eliminate the possibility of containing the virus in the U.S. and preventing an outbreak.

“There are few enough cases that we should at least try,” he said. “Most of us are not optimistic that that will be successful, but we’re still in the position to try.”

[Mr_Tomahawk]

I can almost draw a perfect circle.

[Donger]

Originally Posted by Mr_Tomahawk

I can almost draw a perfect circle.

[Mr_Tomahawk]

Originally Posted by Donger

Mannnnnnnnn.......

[TLO]

So there's a new study out that showed like 80 out of 100 people showed some sort of heart damage after recovering from Covid. Most of these people recovered at home, a smaller percentage required oxygen, and 2 were on ventilators.

https://www.cardiovascularbusiness.c...amage-recovery

[loochy]

Originally Posted by TLO

So there's a new study out that showed like 80 out 1 of 100 people showed some sort of heart damage after recovering from Covid. Most of these people recovered at home, a smaller percentage required oxygen, and 2 were on ventilators.

https://www.cardiovascularbusiness.c...amage-recovery

Does it say how many had heart damage before covid?

[TLO]

Originally Posted by loochy

Does it say how many had heart damage before covid?

I believe out of the 100 person sample group 0 had pre-existing heart conditions.

If someone wants to dive into that article and make me feel better please do so.

This seems like awful news.

[O.city]

Originally Posted by TLO

I believe out of the 100 person sample group 0 had pre-existing heart conditions.

If someone wants to dive into that article and make me feel better please do so.

This seems like awful news.

Not good, will also caution that post influenza tends to cause a fair amount of cardiovascular issues as well. So it's not necessarily just about Covid doing it.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/...1111/irv.12470

[dirk digler]

Originally Posted by TLO

So there's a new study out that showed like 80 out of 100 people showed some sort of heart damage after recovering from Covid. Most of these people recovered at home, a smaller percentage required oxygen, and 2 were on ventilators.

https://www.cardiovascularbusiness.c...amage-recovery

I thought about posting that study but then I didn't want certain people to whine that I am all doom and gloom. Good job TLO

[TLO]

Originally Posted by O.city

Not good, will also caution that post influenza tends to cause a fair amount of cardiovascular issues as well. So it's not necessarily just about Covid doing it.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/...1111/irv.12470

So maybe just a temporary thing that gets better over time?

[stumppy]

Originally Posted by petegz28

Ignore the title of the video, the video is not political outside of the title.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/fb-...ted-Trump.html

Meet Trump's new favorite doctor, Dr Stella Immanuel, a homophobic preacher who uses 'alien DNA' as a cure, blames witchcraft for illness and says hydroxychloroquine can stop Covid 19......






Sorry about the politician mentioned, just wanted to provide some info about petes source.

[Rain Man]

Do we think that's permanent damage or does it go away over time?

[O.city]

Originally Posted by TLO

So maybe just a temporary thing that gets better over time?

Well, we don't know.

Thats why the "longterm effects" thing is just that, we don't know. We know how it is with other viral infections so frankly I don't see this one being substantially different.

But again, we don't know for sure and won't for a while.

[SAUTO]

Originally Posted by lewdog

Get a degree in IT like Pete and you’d be real knowledgeable.

I think I met him yesterday...

Guy comes in the shop saying it's all BS. we had our first death in county saturday morning (a grandma who got it from her 5 year old grandson BTW) but this guy says the person who died was his mom and she never was tested for covid.

I told him it wasn't his mom they were counting, he countered with "how many people from our county could have died in one day? "

I personally know the lady who died. It wasn't his mom they were counting.

[TLO]

Originally Posted by O.city

Well, we don't know.

Thats why the "longterm effects" thing is just that, we don't know. We know how it is with other viral infections so frankly I don't see this one being substantially different.

But again, we don't know for sure and won't for a while.

It sounds incredibly scary. You should look at the study if you find the time and see what it says. Maybe it's not as terrifying as the headline makes it seem. I legit felt like I was gonna have a panic attack when I read it.

[suzzer99]

Originally Posted by TLO

So there's a new study out that showed like 80 out of 100 people showed some sort of heart damage after recovering from Covid. Most of these people recovered at home, a smaller percentage required oxygen, and 2 were on ventilators.

https://www.cardiovascularbusiness.c...amage-recovery

I'm I'm reading this right - the 100 people in this study were admitted to the hospital, or at least got tested at the hospital.

The authors studied cardiac imaging results of 100 adult patients included in the University Hospital Frankfurt COVID-19 Registry.

So it's not like a random sample of 100 people who tested positive.