***NON-POLITICAL COVID-19 Discussion Thread***

[JakeF]

A couple of reminders...

Originally Posted by Bwana

Once again, don't come in this thread with some kind of political agenda, or you will be shown the door. If you want to go that route, there is a thread about this in DC.

Originally Posted by Dartgod

People, there is a lot of good information in this thread, let's try to keep the petty bickering to a minimum.

We all have varying opinions about the impact of this, the numbers, etc. We will all never agree with each other. But we can all keep it civil.

Thanks!

Click here for the original OP:

Spoiler!

Apparently the CoronaVirus can survive on a inanimate objects, such as door knobs, for 9 days.

California coronavirus case could be first spread within U.S. community, CDC says
By SOUMYA KARLAMANGLA, JACLYN COSGROVE
FEB. 26, 2020 8:04 PM

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is investigating what could be the first case of novel coronavirus in the United States involving a patient in California who neither recently traveled out of the country nor was in contact with someone who did.

“At this time, the patient’s exposure is unknown. It’s possible this could be an instance of community spread of COVID-19, which would be the first time this has happened in the United States,” the CDC said in a statement. “Community spread means spread of an illness for which the source of infection is unknown. It’s also possible, however, that the patient may have been exposed to a returned traveler who was infected.”

The individual is a resident of Solano County and is receiving medical care in Sacramento County, according to the state Department of Public Health.

The CDC said the “case was detected through the U.S. public health system — picked up by astute clinicians.”

Officials at UC Davis Medical Center expanded on what the federal agency might have meant by that in an email sent Wednesday, as reported by the Davis Enterprise newspaper.

The patient arrived at UC Davis Medical Center from another hospital Feb. 19 and “had already been intubated, was on a ventilator, and given droplet protection orders because of an undiagnosed and suspected viral condition,” according to an email sent by UC Davis officials that was obtained by the Davis Enterprise.

The staff at UC Davis requested COVID-19 testing by the CDC, but because the patient didn’t fit the CDC’s existing criteria for the virus, a test wasn’t immediately administered, according to the email. The CDC then ordered the test Sunday, and results were announced Wednesday. Hospital administrators reportedly said in the email that despite these issues, there has been minimal exposure at the hospital because of safety protocols they have in place.

A UC Davis Health spokesperson declined Wednesday evening to share the email with The Times.

Since Feb. 2, more than 8,400 returning travelers from China have entered California, according to the state health department. They have been advised to self-quarantine for 14 days and limit interactions with others as much as possible, officials said.

“This is a new virus, and while we are still learning about it, there is a lot we already know,” Dr. Sonia Angell, director of the California Department of Public Health, said in a statement. “We have been anticipating the potential for such a case in the U.S., and given our close familial, social and business relationships with China, it is not unexpected that the first case in the U.S. would be in California.”

It is not clear how the person became infected, but public health workers could not identify any contacts with people who had traveled to China or other areas where the virus is widespread. That raises concern that the virus is spreading in the United States, creating a challenge for public health officials, experts say.

“It’s the first signal that we could be having silent transmission in the community,” said Lawrence Gostin, director of the World Health Organization Collaborating Center on National and Global Health Law. “It probably means there are many more cases out there, and it probably means this individual has infected others, and now it’s a race to try to find out who that person has infected.”

On Tuesday, the CDC offered its most serious warning to date that the United States should expect and prepare for the coronavirus to become a more widespread health issue.

“Ultimately, we expect we will see coronavirus spread in this country,” said Nancy Messonnier, director of the CDC’s National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases. “It’s not so much a question of if, but a question of when.”

According to the CDC’s latest count Wednesday morning, 59 U.S. residents have tested positive for the new strain of coronavirus — 42 of whom are repatriated citizens from a Diamond Princess cruise. That number has grown by two since Messonnier’s last count Tuesday, although the CDC was not immediately available to offer details on the additional cases.

More than 82,000 cases of coronavirus have been reported globally, and more than 2,700 people have died, with the majority in mainland China, the epicenter of the outbreak.

But public health leaders have repeatedly reminded residents that the health risk from the novel coronavirus to the general public remains low.

“While COVID-19 has a high transmission rate, it has a low mortality rate,” the state Department of Public Health said in a statement Wednesday. “From the international data we have, of those who have tested positive for COVID-19, approximately 80% do not exhibit symptoms that would require hospitalization. There have been no confirmed deaths related to COVID-19 in the United States to date.”

CDC officials have also warned that although the virus is likely to spread in U.S. communities, the flu still poses a greater risk.

Gostin said the news of potential silent transmission does not eliminate the possibility of containing the virus in the U.S. and preventing an outbreak.

“There are few enough cases that we should at least try,” he said. “Most of us are not optimistic that that will be successful, but we’re still in the position to try.”

[Monticore]

Originally Posted by petegz28

So now the mask is to protect me from others? I thought it was to protect others from me?

You and Donger trying to have it both ways I see.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

It does both , one to a lesser degree than the other .

At first I thought you actually wanted to learn more about this , but I am starting to wonder.

[SAUTO]

Originally Posted by petegz28

So now the mask is to protect me from others? I thought it was to protect others from me?

You and Donger trying to have it both ways I see.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Then why did you bring up eyes and ears?

[jdubya]

Since the inception of the interweb it is interesting to observe that when discussions begin to fail, the accusations over how often some spend on a discussion board every day begin to circulate. Why does it matter?

Anyway, back to masks

[SAUTO]

Originally Posted by Spott

A Pinto is probably safer than a Tesla or a Geo.

Um no.


The fuel tanks could blow up in a rear end collision

[petegz28]

Originally Posted by Monticore

It does both , one to a lesser degree than the other .



At first I thought you actually wanted to learn more about this , but I am starting to wonder.

Huh. When I posted the pic of the mask instructions saying it doesn't protect from covid I was lectured that it was to protect others from the wearer of the mask. Now suddenly it's both?

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

[PAChiefsGuy]

Originally Posted by Monticore

It does both , one to a lesser degree than the other .

At first I thought you actually wanted to learn more about this , but I am starting to wonder.

Pete loves to bitch and argue I swear. I don't see the big deal about wearing a mask. It takes 2-seconds to put on and 2-seconds to take off. Sucks not to be able to see hot chicks faces but that is about it

[petegz28]

Originally Posted by SAUTO

Um no.





The fuel tanks could blow up in a rear end collision

Think hard...it will come to you o promise.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

[BWillie]

Originally Posted by Spott

A Pinto is probably safer than a Tesla or a Geo.

Almost no old cars are as safe as cars today. Cars today have crush zones and are created with advanced engineering. They are designed to slinky up. People think that rigid cars of the past are always safer because of it. It's the opposite, in most cases.

[Monticore]

Originally Posted by petegz28

Huh. When I posted the pic of the mask instructions saying it doesn't protect from covid I was lectured that it was to protect others from the wearer of the mask. Now suddenly it's both?

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

now you are just being a dick , we have been talking about it for the last 6 pages and how it can offer some protection used correctly .

a condom used incorrectly can offer zero protection also but saying if offers none is not correct.

[Baby Lee]

Originally Posted by BWillie

You have to speak in absolutes to Pete, he doesn't understand nuance. Sometimes though, there is nuance in life. Which he does not understand.

nuance is a shittier word than draconian.

[Pants]

I'm sure pete is the guy who never loses an argument. Even when realizes he's wrong, he will keep arguing for the sake of not losing. I was like that when I was 17, I think.

[Monticore]

Originally Posted by Baby Lee

nuance is a shittier word than draconian.

ya both those words kind of suck.

[Monticore]

Originally Posted by PAChiefsGuy

Pete loves to bitch and argue I swear. I don't see the big deal about wearing a mask. It takes 2-seconds to put on and 2-seconds to take off. Sucks not to be able to see hot chicks faces but that is about it

I think the P in HBP stands for Pete.

[BleedingRed]

Originally Posted by Monticore

now you are just being a dick , we have been talking about it for the last 6 pages and how it can offer some protection used correctly .

a condom used incorrectly can offer zero protection also but saying if offers none is not correct.

You opinion is irrelevant, you don't like Joe Rogan....

[petegz28]

Originally Posted by Monticore

now you are just being a dick , we have been talking about it for the last 6 pages and how it can offer some protection used correctly .



a condom used incorrectly can offer zero protection also but saying if offers none is not correct.

I've not heard any expert or manufacturer say it does anything more than protect others from the wearer of thr mask. Even posted the picture of the mask instructions stating such

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk