|
06-26-2024, 11:33 AM | ||
Andy Reid Supporter
Join Date: Apr 2012
|
Some owners discussing a QB salary cap separate of the current cap
It seems this is starting to gain popularity.
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 46,490
|
06-26-2024, 12:00 PM | #16 |
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2013
|
1. Not sure owners want to do this, it’s just more money out of their pocket, assuming they keep the current salary cap while now separating the qb salary entirely.
2. This would benefit us greatly and hurt teams like the 49ers and Texans who are paying their qbs pennys. |
Posts: 2,815
|
06-26-2024, 12:08 PM | #17 | |
Hockey Town
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Kansas City, Missouri
|
Quote:
It would help teams that spend a shit ton of money It would hurt teams that aren't massive spenders. Like even if this happens the Bengals aren't gonna magically find money for everyone, they just aren't a huge cash spending team. |
|
Posts: 111,355
|
06-26-2024, 12:09 PM | #18 | |
Diablo Negro
Join Date: Sep 2003
|
Quote:
On one side it gives teams like KC a chance to sign an elite receiver for example. On the other side it doesn't penalize a team like Denver for giving Russel Wilson that stupid ass contract. |
|
Posts: 69,937
|
1 0 |
06-26-2024, 12:12 PM | #19 |
Hockey Town
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Kansas City, Missouri
|
Lets also be fair here, this is a bargaining chip.
The owners want 18 games, this is something that can be offered in return because it allows more money to be spent on other players. |
Posts: 111,355
|
06-26-2024, 12:30 PM | #20 |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2024
|
The rest of the league trying to catch up to the Chiefs by changing the rules, because other dumb GMs can't assemble a championship team while paying a top-tier QB.
And it still won't work, because they don't have Mahomes. Last edited by ThrobProng; 06-26-2024 at 01:55 PM.. |
Posts: 1,926
|
3 0 |
06-26-2024, 12:38 PM | #21 | |
MVP
Join Date: Aug 2019
|
Quote:
I guess I shouldn't call it a disadvantage, because obviously we could build a much better roster, but it definitely would tip the scales a bit for the other teams. It's probably the best option for parity overall, which we know is what they want. If we 3-peat, I would fully expect something like this to be implemented. |
|
Posts: 7,746
|
06-26-2024, 01:22 PM | #22 |
MVP
Join Date: Oct 2012
|
It may have already been said but Mahomes is the only one paid like a super start that's pulled his weight. We should want the Burrows and Allens burdened by their own number.
|
Posts: 11,151
|
1 0 |
06-26-2024, 02:16 PM | #23 | |
Hey Loochy, I'm hooome!
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: PooPooKaKaPeePeeShire
|
Quote:
This. Just manage your shit. If you can't afford anyone after your QB then it's your fault for having a shitty gm. |
|
Posts: 40,824
|
06-26-2024, 03:08 PM | #24 | |
El Gato Gordo Loco Anaranjado
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Earth
|
Quote:
Not my problem. |
|
Posts: 46,760
|
06-26-2024, 03:48 PM | #25 |
It was not a fair catch
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Correcting papers
|
|
Posts: 36,946
|
1 0 |
06-26-2024, 04:10 PM | #26 | |
Consuming CP souls
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: U.S.A.
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 69,410
|
06-26-2024, 04:11 PM | #27 |
Consuming CP souls
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: U.S.A.
|
Not for rewarding dumb **** teams paying Dak, Lawrence, Dan Jones, as much as the GOAT Pat. Dumb ****s....it is fine the way it is.
|
Posts: 69,410
|
1 0 |
|
|