Darrelle Revis

[vailpass]

Originally Posted by DenverChief

Whatever young adults. People acting like douches are still protected by the law. Revis had no right to physically assault them. I find it ironic that the same people that applaud Revis would condemn a police officer for the exact same behavior. Either it's good for all or good for none.

I would also applaud the police officer in that situation.
Many times I've seen the footage of an officer trying to do his job and the hood rats swarm him taking video on their obama phones. Wouldn't mind seeing the cop rap some wrists with a baton and knock those phones to the ground.

[POND_OF_RED]

I think I'm going to believe the NFL vet who has everything to lose over the drunk college kids. Sounds like the douche knew what he was doing. Don't pick a fight with an NFL player if you don't want to get knocked out.

[-King-]

Yeah **** them, they got what they deserved.
Posted via Mobile Device

[Mr. Laz]

they should change the law

You shouldn't be able to film someone if they ask you to stop, regardless of where you are at.

Unless there is some kind of crime being committed or something.

[Rain Man]

Originally Posted by Mr. Laz

they should change the law

You shouldn't be able to film someone if they ask you to stop, regardless of where you are at.

Unless there is some kind of crime being committed or something.

I fall in line with this opinion. Celebrities shouldn't be held hostage in their homes, and the photographers would be annoying, whether you're Princess Diana in Paris or Darrelle Revis walking on the south side. Leave these people alone.

My initial hunch is also to side with Revis. I've never read anything that indicates he's a troublemaker, and his side of the story sounds more plausible than theirs by a long shot.

[Couch-Potato]

Originally Posted by Rain Man

I fall in line with this opinion. Celebrities shouldn't be held hostage in their homes, and the photographers would be annoying, whether you're Princess Diana in Paris or Darrelle Revis walking on the south side. Leave these people alone.

My initial hunch is also to side with Revis. I've never read anything that indicates he's a troublemaker, and his side of the story sounds more plausible than theirs by a long shot.

I agree... Maybe we can bring him in cheap as a FS now.

[TribalElder]

Originally Posted by Couch-Potato

I agree... Maybe we can bring him in cheap as a FS now.

Charges were dropped on this case after friend testified Revis didn't do it

http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/fo...icle-1.2998930

[splatbass]

Originally Posted by Mr. Laz

they should change the law

You shouldn't be able to film someone if they ask you to stop, regardless of where you are at.

Unless there is some kind of crime being committed or something.

Say you are in Arrowhead. It is a playoff game and the place is rocking. You pull out your cellphone and take some pictures of the stadium from your seat. Some guy in front of you insists you delete all the pictures because he is in them. Do you do it?

[Rain Man]

Originally Posted by splatbass

Say you are in Arrowhead. It is a playoff game and the place is rocking. You pull out your cellphone and take some pictures of the stadium from your seat. Some guy in front of you insists you delete all the pictures because he is in them. Do you do it?

If it's Revis I do.

But more to the point, I think you can define some rules. If you're following someone around taking pictures of them, I think that falls under the "stop it" rule. If you're one of 50 people in the frame, probably not.

[Bugeater]

Originally Posted by Rain Man

If it's Revis I do.

But more to the point, I think you can define some rules. If you're following someone around taking pictures of them, I think that falls under the "stop it" rule. If you're one of 50 people in the frame, probably not.

Yeah, at some point it crosses the line to harassment.

[splatbass]

Originally Posted by Rain Man

If it's Revis I do.

But more to the point, I think you can define some rules. If you're following someone around taking pictures of them, I think that falls under the "stop it" rule. If you're one of 50 people in the frame, probably not.

You don't have a right to follow someone around harassing them regardless of whether you are taking pictures. It really isn't about taking pictures/video. When you go out in public you are just that, in public, not in private. No right to privacy.

[POND_OF_RED]

Originally Posted by splatbass

Say you are in Arrowhead. It is a playoff game and the place is rocking. You pull out your cellphone and take some pictures of the stadium from your seat. Some guy in front of you insists you delete all the pictures because he is in them. Do you do it?

Why the **** am I taking pictures while the rest of Arrowhead is rocking during a playoff game?

[Rain Man]

Originally Posted by POND_OF_RED

Why the **** am I taking pictures while the rest of Arrowhead is rocking during a playoff game?

Presumably you're planning to sell the photos to a tabloid so they can write a story about the person in front of you.

[splatbass]

Originally Posted by POND_OF_RED

Why the **** am I taking pictures while the rest of Arrowhead is rocking during a playoff game?

You want to remember the great game that Alex Smith played.

I just chose Arrowhead because it is a Chiefs forum. Let's say you take your family on a once in a lifetime trip to Disneyland. No, I don't know why it is once in a lifetime. You take a picture of them there, and there are people in the background....etc.