|
07-29-2010, 09:37 AM | #16 |
Eat/Sleep/Procrastinate/Repeat
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dystopia
|
|
Posts: 33,369
|
07-29-2010, 09:39 AM | #17 |
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Some Dude's asshole
|
Have you seen her in anything else? She's aweful. Aweful. In everything else I've seen her in. Aweful.
|
Posts: 3,834
|
07-29-2010, 12:49 PM | #18 |
Woman should only make babies
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Apartment "G UNIT!"
|
peggy is the bomb the real acting is in the body language and tone of voice in this show. that is where the action is!
|
Posts: 54,563
|
07-29-2010, 12:56 PM | #19 |
Supporter
Join Date: Aug 2000
|
|
Posts: 95,642
|
07-29-2010, 12:59 PM | #20 |
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Some Dude's asshole
|
|
Posts: 3,834
|
07-29-2010, 01:01 PM | #21 |
Band
Join Date: Sep 2005
|
|
Posts: 8,302
|
07-29-2010, 01:05 PM | #22 |
Supporter
Join Date: Aug 2000
|
|
Posts: 95,642
|
07-29-2010, 02:19 PM | #23 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Some Dude's asshole
|
Quote:
Feel free to keep busting me on it. Maybe one of these days it'll sink in. But seriously, the spell check thing here doesn't work for me. I always get an error message. |
|
Posts: 3,834
|
07-29-2010, 10:11 PM | #24 | |
Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hollywood, CA
|
Quote:
If you see a word underlined in red after typing, right click on the word, then select the correct spelling. It's not "forum dependent", it's "browser dependent". |
|
Posts: 88,960
|
07-29-2010, 10:14 PM | #25 |
oxymoron
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: OP/KC/Whatever
|
No, he was spelling it correctly. He meant her performance filled him with awe. And he thinks movies with babies are awwful.
|
Posts: 58,682
|
07-29-2010, 10:23 PM | #26 |
Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hollywood, CA
|
Oh and FWIW, I was fairly disappointed with the season opener.
It was such a "uh, okay, no brainer" that I felt it wasn't even necessary. I fully expected the season opener to be at least a couple episodes ahead of where they started. Boring. |
Posts: 88,960
|
07-29-2010, 10:34 PM | #27 |
MVP
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
|
I which way? I thought where their firm was at the point of the opener seemed about right. There had to be some gray area of startup vs. success/failure.
|
Posts: 14,532
|
07-29-2010, 10:40 PM | #28 | |
Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hollywood, CA
|
Quote:
There's no way it would have been a failure, because it's all about Don Draper. So that little exercise was unwarranted. They could have referenced the Ad Age article by following it up with the WSJ. That was way too extrapolated, IMO. There's a weird vibe going on with the new husband and I'm glad they pushed that a little further. But the daughter rebelling was typical (as was the boy ignoring it all). We've seen Don cover Peggy's ass all too many times, IMO. They need to move forward, not try to inundate new viewers to the past. Entourage pulls this shit each year and it's usually at least two episodes in (if not more) before it's watchable. |
|
Posts: 88,960
|
07-29-2010, 11:11 PM | #29 | |
MVP
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
|
Quote:
He has always been the shadowy brilliant guy that comes out of the shadows to drop his pitch. Now he has become the driving force of the firm and hence the change to the WSJ interview as well as his telling the bikini conservative guys to get the **** out. |
|
Posts: 14,532
|
07-29-2010, 11:16 PM | #30 | |
Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hollywood, CA
|
Quote:
Once he realized that his personal life was invading his professional space, he snapped back "into place" and became the calm, cool, electrifying Don Draper we all know. I think it would have been FAR more interesting if the Korean Vet that interviewed him actually knew a "Don Draper", instead of what occurred. For the first time ever in this series, I feel that Weiner dropped the ball. He may redeem himself down the line with an episode that ties into this one in a big way, but it still felt like an "introductory" episode to me. |
|
Posts: 88,960
|
|
|