|
04-30-2016, 01:14 PM | |
Tossed Salad & Scrambled Eggs
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: ATX & OPKS
|
****The Tyreek Hill Thread***
With the 165th pick, in the 5th round.
Last edited by Dante84; 04-30-2016 at 02:00 PM.. |
Posts: 19,986
|
06-01-2022, 04:29 PM | #2821 |
Inmem 2.0
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: My house
|
|
Posts: 76,255
|
06-01-2022, 04:31 PM | #2822 |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Oct 2007
|
|
Posts: 50,674
|
06-01-2022, 04:36 PM | #2823 |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Oct 2007
|
The Chiefs had every intention of keeping Hill AND Brown going into the offseason.
So no, they did not “choose OBJ over Hill”. ****ing morons. |
Posts: 50,674
|
1 0 |
06-01-2022, 04:37 PM | #2824 |
Inmem 2.0
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: My house
|
|
Posts: 76,255
|
06-01-2022, 04:40 PM | #2825 | |
MVP
Join Date: Mar 2013
|
Quote:
But yeah, we ‘suppressed’ his ass into a first ballot HOF’er over the last 6 years. Well, at least until he went to Miami. The grass isn’t always greener even if there’s a lot more green on the other side. He will find that out soon enough. I love Hill and wish him the best, no hard feelings whatsoever, but if he or his agent are in any way (not saying they are at this point) suggesting the Chiefs intentionally suppressed his value in the offense in order to retain him more cheaply, then they both can go **** themselves with a rusty fork. I mean, the Chiefs are legit trying to win Super Bowls every ****ing year for the last 4 years, and we’re gonna intentionally sabotage our most dangerous weapon to help with future contract negotiations? GTFO with that bullshit. |
|
Posts: 9,337
|
06-01-2022, 04:46 PM | #2826 | |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Oct 2007
|
Quote:
And even if that were the case, it would still be an oversimplification. It’s not about OBJ vs. Hill. It’s about what they got for Hill and the money they saved. It’s about positional value (LT vs. WR). It’s about age/longevity (both of their current ages, and what positions age better). But of course an inbred reerun like yourself doesn’t understand nuance. |
|
Posts: 50,674
|
1 0 |
06-01-2022, 04:47 PM | #2827 | |
Inmem 2.0
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: My house
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 76,255
|
06-01-2022, 04:47 PM | #2828 |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Oct 2007
|
|
Posts: 50,674
|
06-01-2022, 06:21 PM | #2829 |
Special Teams ACE!!!
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Where the hell is SNR
|
|
Posts: 91,870
|
06-01-2022, 06:24 PM | #2830 |
Bolton gonna knock you out
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: They Freed Kartel!!
|
|
Posts: 20,923
|
06-01-2022, 06:36 PM | #2831 |
Inmem 2.0
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: My house
|
We would need DJ to break that contract. In the next few years I don't see how the offense is better though especially with an aging Kelce.
|
Posts: 76,255
|
06-01-2022, 07:05 PM | #2832 |
Three-Pat
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Colorado Springs
|
Thing is though Hill of last year was not the same Hill. He had a serious case of dropsies that led to INTs and teams started to take away his deep game by dropping safeties back and doubling him. He still did well, but that is not a good sign for someone like him who heavily relies on being the fastest guy on the field. At what he was going to cost the possibility of him living up to that contract would be slim.
|
Posts: 18,029
|
06-01-2022, 07:10 PM | #2833 |
Andy Reid Supporter
Join Date: Apr 2012
|
|
Posts: 47,825
|
06-01-2022, 07:28 PM | #2834 | |
Inmem 2.0
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: My house
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 76,255
|
06-01-2022, 07:29 PM | #2835 | |
Inmem 2.0
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: My house
|
Quote:
I'm not faulting Veach for what he did. Again it was making the best out of a tough situation but it seems to be a foregone conclusion on here that we are better without Hill. Simply not the case. |
|
Posts: 76,255
|
|
|