|
02-18-2018, 03:04 PM | #226 |
MVP
Join Date: Jan 2013
|
I'm not trading a top corner for a draft pick. It's stupid and you should feel stupid for even suggesting it as a possibility. Veach says he wants to get younger. We have a top 5 corner/ turnover machine in Peters.
|
Posts: 10,753
|
02-18-2018, 03:10 PM | #227 |
pie is never free
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: the drivers seat
|
I find it highly unlikely as well, but stranger things have happened... and none of us knows what Veach is thinking
|
Posts: 94,091
|
02-18-2018, 03:15 PM | #228 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2016
|
Quote:
I think if Cleveland is willing to give up the #4 pick in the draft for Peters and maybe your 2nd or 3rd, the target would be a pass rusher like Davenport or Chubb if there. I don't see Cleveland giving away it's fourth overall pick for Peters straight up just based on Jimmy Johnson's draft day trade charts. Peters was taken with the 18th pick in the draft if GM's go by spot taken to determine value. It is hard to monetize his draft pick value especially when your talking a top 5 pick. |
|
Posts: 1,760
|
02-18-2018, 03:16 PM | #229 |
Special Teams ACE!!!
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Where the hell is SNR
|
Well, according to like 75% of the dumbshits on this board, the Chiefs were just supposed flat out cut Peters' ass after his pseudo-ejection during a game this year. Because they just "had enough."
Interesting that they're all running on silent or have changed their position to "we should trade him!" |
Posts: 91,840
|
02-18-2018, 03:17 PM | #230 |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Jul 2009
|
The browns aren’t trading the #4 pick for Peters
|
Posts: 82,344
|
02-18-2018, 03:18 PM | #231 |
The man you could post like.
Join Date: Oct 2010
|
|
Posts: 39,307
|
02-18-2018, 03:19 PM | #232 |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Jul 2009
|
|
Posts: 82,344
|
02-18-2018, 03:20 PM | #233 |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2016
|
|
Posts: 1,760
|
02-18-2018, 03:22 PM | #234 |
Andy Reid Supporter
Join Date: Apr 2012
|
Veach said he wants youth...not old players nearing the end like Talib.
|
Posts: 47,732
|
02-18-2018, 03:22 PM | #235 |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Jul 2009
|
|
Posts: 82,344
|
02-18-2018, 03:24 PM | #236 |
The man you could post like.
Join Date: Oct 2010
|
This is the best the Broncos trolls can do now. No wonder Knowmo ran crying and screaming when Dane was mean to him.
|
Posts: 39,307
|
02-18-2018, 03:28 PM | #237 | |
Champs!
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Kansas City
|
Quote:
I agree with you that KC's issue is the front seven. When you are ranked 25th in the NFL on rush defense, that's going to pose a lot of problems. Not to mention that KC is ranked 24th in the NFL on sacks. KC needs to targeting their front seven (except Ragland and Houston) to resolve these issues. |
|
Posts: 53,625
|
02-18-2018, 03:29 PM | #238 |
pie is never free
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: the drivers seat
|
|
Posts: 94,091
|
02-18-2018, 03:33 PM | #239 |
SUPER BOWL CHAMPIONS
Join Date: Aug 2013
|
I was cool with the Talib idea until we managed to haul Fuller in. Not anymore. Fuller is the better long term option, and probably the better short term option given Talib could slide at any moment.
|
Posts: 26,806
|
02-18-2018, 03:44 PM | #240 |
Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hollywood, CA
|
I disagree.
The new breed of GM’s across the league are very different than the old school, older men that they’ve replaced. As we’ve seen in the last year alone, teams are more aggressively trading assets for picks. We’ve seen NBA style salary dumps and more player-for-player trades. We just saw the Redskins trade their best and youngest secondary player in a deal for a QB. Things are beginning to change in the NFL and with the continuation of a very healthy rise in the salary cap, I’d be surprised if all but the best QB’s are off limits. Outside of Pat Mahomes and Eric Berry, no one is safe in this new environment. |
Posts: 88,960
|
|
|