***NON-POLITICAL COVID-19 Discussion Thread***

[JakeF]

A couple of reminders...

Originally Posted by Bwana

Once again, don't come in this thread with some kind of political agenda, or you will be shown the door. If you want to go that route, there is a thread about this in DC.

Originally Posted by Dartgod

People, there is a lot of good information in this thread, let's try to keep the petty bickering to a minimum.

We all have varying opinions about the impact of this, the numbers, etc. We will all never agree with each other. But we can all keep it civil.

Thanks!

Click here for the original OP:

Spoiler!

Apparently the CoronaVirus can survive on a inanimate objects, such as door knobs, for 9 days.

California coronavirus case could be first spread within U.S. community, CDC says
By SOUMYA KARLAMANGLA, JACLYN COSGROVE
FEB. 26, 2020 8:04 PM

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is investigating what could be the first case of novel coronavirus in the United States involving a patient in California who neither recently traveled out of the country nor was in contact with someone who did.

“At this time, the patient’s exposure is unknown. It’s possible this could be an instance of community spread of COVID-19, which would be the first time this has happened in the United States,” the CDC said in a statement. “Community spread means spread of an illness for which the source of infection is unknown. It’s also possible, however, that the patient may have been exposed to a returned traveler who was infected.”

The individual is a resident of Solano County and is receiving medical care in Sacramento County, according to the state Department of Public Health.

The CDC said the “case was detected through the U.S. public health system — picked up by astute clinicians.”

Officials at UC Davis Medical Center expanded on what the federal agency might have meant by that in an email sent Wednesday, as reported by the Davis Enterprise newspaper.

The patient arrived at UC Davis Medical Center from another hospital Feb. 19 and “had already been intubated, was on a ventilator, and given droplet protection orders because of an undiagnosed and suspected viral condition,” according to an email sent by UC Davis officials that was obtained by the Davis Enterprise.

The staff at UC Davis requested COVID-19 testing by the CDC, but because the patient didn’t fit the CDC’s existing criteria for the virus, a test wasn’t immediately administered, according to the email. The CDC then ordered the test Sunday, and results were announced Wednesday. Hospital administrators reportedly said in the email that despite these issues, there has been minimal exposure at the hospital because of safety protocols they have in place.

A UC Davis Health spokesperson declined Wednesday evening to share the email with The Times.

Since Feb. 2, more than 8,400 returning travelers from China have entered California, according to the state health department. They have been advised to self-quarantine for 14 days and limit interactions with others as much as possible, officials said.

“This is a new virus, and while we are still learning about it, there is a lot we already know,” Dr. Sonia Angell, director of the California Department of Public Health, said in a statement. “We have been anticipating the potential for such a case in the U.S., and given our close familial, social and business relationships with China, it is not unexpected that the first case in the U.S. would be in California.”

It is not clear how the person became infected, but public health workers could not identify any contacts with people who had traveled to China or other areas where the virus is widespread. That raises concern that the virus is spreading in the United States, creating a challenge for public health officials, experts say.

“It’s the first signal that we could be having silent transmission in the community,” said Lawrence Gostin, director of the World Health Organization Collaborating Center on National and Global Health Law. “It probably means there are many more cases out there, and it probably means this individual has infected others, and now it’s a race to try to find out who that person has infected.”

On Tuesday, the CDC offered its most serious warning to date that the United States should expect and prepare for the coronavirus to become a more widespread health issue.

“Ultimately, we expect we will see coronavirus spread in this country,” said Nancy Messonnier, director of the CDC’s National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases. “It’s not so much a question of if, but a question of when.”

According to the CDC’s latest count Wednesday morning, 59 U.S. residents have tested positive for the new strain of coronavirus — 42 of whom are repatriated citizens from a Diamond Princess cruise. That number has grown by two since Messonnier’s last count Tuesday, although the CDC was not immediately available to offer details on the additional cases.

More than 82,000 cases of coronavirus have been reported globally, and more than 2,700 people have died, with the majority in mainland China, the epicenter of the outbreak.

But public health leaders have repeatedly reminded residents that the health risk from the novel coronavirus to the general public remains low.

“While COVID-19 has a high transmission rate, it has a low mortality rate,” the state Department of Public Health said in a statement Wednesday. “From the international data we have, of those who have tested positive for COVID-19, approximately 80% do not exhibit symptoms that would require hospitalization. There have been no confirmed deaths related to COVID-19 in the United States to date.”

CDC officials have also warned that although the virus is likely to spread in U.S. communities, the flu still poses a greater risk.

Gostin said the news of potential silent transmission does not eliminate the possibility of containing the virus in the U.S. and preventing an outbreak.

“There are few enough cases that we should at least try,” he said. “Most of us are not optimistic that that will be successful, but we’re still in the position to try.”

[Monticore]

Originally Posted by petegz28

The blurb I got was not so much that the results were good but where the results were coming from lending a lot of credibility to it all.

University based research /trials > anecdotal tweet

[patteeu]

Originally Posted by Titty Meat

The cocaine will help with the hangover

In his autobiography, GnR's Duff McKagan says that he wasn't really into cocaine, until he figured out it could help him stay awake to keep drinking. It almost killed him though.

[BleedingRed]

Originally Posted by Monticore

University based research /trials > anecdotal tweet

University with anecdotal evidence*

[TLO]

IHME updated.. Big shift in Missouri

https://covid19.healthdata.org/unite...erica/missouri

[TLO]

60,000 deaths in the U.S. overall

[Discuss Thrower]

Originally Posted by TLO

60,000 deaths in the U.S. overall

Preeeeeetty clear to me seeing that last graph that there will be no logical reason to end "shelter in place" mandates for the foreseeable future.

O/U days until Mayor Q extends the mandate past May 15: 7.5

[LiveSteam]

Originally Posted by Donger

Not that I'm aware of, no.

Are you sure?

[petegz28]

Originally Posted by Donger

NY numbers seem odd. 395 new cases and 1,205 deaths?

Yeah something seems off there

[TLO]

Originally Posted by Discuss Thrower

Preeeeeetty clear to me seeing that last graph that there will be no logical reason to end "shelter in place" mandates for the foreseeable future.

O/U days until Mayor Q extends the mandate past May 15: 7.5

Don't know.

What I do know is it said we were 2 weeks away from peak in deaths and now it says we're 3 days past it.

Also says like 350 people in Missouri will die as opposed to 1800.

These sound like good things

[petegz28]

Originally Posted by TLO

IHME updated.. Big shift in Missouri

https://covid19.healthdata.org/unite...erica/missouri

WTF? I thought the peak was supposed to in 2 weeks, not 2 days??

[petegz28]

Originally Posted by TLO

Don't know.

What I do know is it said we were 2 weeks away from peak in deaths and now it says we're 3 days past it.

Also says like 350 people in Missouri will die as opposed to 1800.

These sound like good things

They are all ****ed up. Based on that graph May 15th will be at the absolute bottom of the bell curve.

[KCUnited]

Originally Posted by TLO

Don't know.

What I do know is it said we were 2 weeks away from peak in deaths and now it says we're 3 days past it.

Also says like 350 people in Missouri will die as opposed to 1800.

These sound like good things

Before it updated today, it had the IL peak at 4/8, now it's 4/18. It's cool to check out, but I wouldn't plan my future around it.

I know you know this, just reiterating.

[eDave]

Shits getting weird in Phoenix

[TLO]

Originally Posted by petegz28

WTF? I thought the peak was supposed to in 2 weeks, not 2 days??

It says we passed the peak 3 days ago.

Originally Posted by KCUnited

Before it updated today, it had the IL peak at 4/8, now it's 4/18. It's cool to check out, but I wouldn't plan my future around it.

I know you know this, just reiterating.

Oh I absolutely know.

[TLO]

Final MO DHSS Numbers for the day

Cases in Missouri: 5,283

Total Deaths: 165

Patients tested in Missouri (by all labs): approximately 53,525

Gov. Parsons said there has actually been less demand for testing recently, and they are closing down some of the drive through testing areas in parts of the state and sending them to St. Louis.

Testing will obviously ramp up again once we start opening things up and we try to isolate and contain new clusters.