...

ROYC75 · 08-12-2014, 04:26 PM

Discussion: All things Broncos.

TEX · 12-29-2017, 03:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe

Why are you here?

Probably to REMIND YOU that he told you that you that the Last Place Denver Broncos would finish in last place, back in April. He tried to tell you during the year, but you were nowhere to be found because you bailed for WEEEEEEEEKS when it started happening.

Quesadilla Joe · 12-29-2017, 03:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TEX

Probably to REMIND YOU that he told you that you guys would suck back in April. He tried to tell you during the year but you bailed for WEEEEEEEEKS when it started happening.

He was saying stuff like that when Denver was winning the division every year and going to Super Bowls as well.

FlaChief58 · 12-29-2017, 03:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe

Dorsey will take the best offer, but if two deals are close I could see him siding with KC's rival if there's some bad blood between Dorsey and KC.

Dorsey isn't trading shit. He has to build his own roster and is in great shape to do so. A shit load of draft picks and tons of cash.

Quesadilla Joe · 12-29-2017, 03:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flachief58

Dorsey isn't trading shit. He has to build his own roster and is in great shape to do so. A shit load of draft picks and tons of cash.

If he uses some of that cash to sign Kirk Cousins he can get himself even more draft picks. Heck, he might be able to get Shaq Barrett along with those draft picks.

BlackOp · 12-29-2017, 03:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe

Why are you here?

Who says I am?

staylor26 · 12-29-2017, 03:39 PM

Dorsey is not trading down in a shit draft class when he already has a shit ton of picks.

He will take the BPA at #1 and with Darnold sounding like he wouldn’t ask the Browns not to pick him, I’d assume it’s a lock it will be him if he comes out.

TEX · 12-29-2017, 03:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe

He was saying stuff like that when Denver was winning the division every year and going to Super Bowls as well.

Well hell, even a broken clock is right twice a day. You, even less than that...

Quesadilla Joe · 12-29-2017, 03:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26

Dorsey is not trading down in a shit draft class when he already has a shit ton of picks.

He will take the BPA at #1 and with Darnold sounding like he wouldn’t ask the Browns not to pick him, I’d assume it’s a lock it will be him if he comes out.

If you like QB's, RB's, and offensive lineman this is pretty good draft. The draft is a little top heavy at other positions though.

**RealSNR** · 12-29-2017, 04:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe

If you like QB's, RB's, and offensive lineman this is pretty good draft. The draft is a little top heavy at other positions though.

That's not what this guy says...

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2...-of-the-decade

And if it's so top-heavy, why the hell would Cleveland want MORE picks at lower value? They have two 1sts in the top 10 already and a billion 2nds. Why the hell wouldn't they just use those picks on the draft's top-end value instead of ****ing around with the shit in the middle and bottom?

They need TOP players. They need to stop losing. They DON'T need more bullshit draft picks.

staylor26 · 12-29-2017, 05:28 PM

Exactly it’s “top heavy”, yet Dorsey is going to trade back for more picks when he already has 5 in the first 2 rounds?

The only way he does that if is it’s for a king’s ransom.

Rams Fan · 12-29-2017, 05:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26

Exactly it’s “top heavy”, yet Dorsey is going to trade back for more picks when he already has 5 picks in the first 2 rounds?

Yes, because John Dorsey only cares about the needs of the Broncos.

Quesadilla Joe · 12-29-2017, 05:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RealSNR

That's not what this guy says...

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2...-of-the-decade

And if it's so top-heavy, why the hell would Cleveland want MORE picks at lower value?

They need TOP players. They need to stop losing. They DON'T need more bullshit draft picks.

They would only be moving down four or five picks. Getting a first this year, a first next year, and Shaq Barrett for the #1 and a 2nd or 3rd rounder would be a good deal for them.

Rams Fan · 12-29-2017, 05:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe

They would only be moving down four or five picks. Getting a first this year, a first next year, and Shaq Barrett for the #1 and a 2nd or 3rd rounder would be a good deal for them.

No, it wouldn't be.

Do you think the Lions would have taken that trade in 2009 after going 0-16? Trading for a picks and a LB does nothing for the Browns. Nothing.

staylor26 · 12-29-2017, 05:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe

They would only be moving down four or five picks. Getting a first this year, a first next year, and Shaq Barrett for the #1 and a 2nd or 3rd rounder would be a good deal for them.

I love how KnowMo continues to bring up Barrett’s name in trades like he’s this extremely valuable asset. Why the **** do the Browns want Barrett when they have Garrett and Ogbah?

Quesadilla Joe · 12-29-2017, 05:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rams Fan

No, it wouldn't be.

Do you think the Lions would have taken that trade in 2009 after going 0-16? Trading for a picks and a LB does nothing for the Browns. Nothing.

If they had brought in a FA QB like Cousins before the draft, sure they would.

Barrett's no slouch. If he was a UFA he'd get 10-12 million per year.

08-12-2014, 04:26 PM
ROYC75 Time For Your Wake Up Call !!! ROYC75's Avatar Join Date: Oct 2000 Location: Barn Yard	Broncos news megathread Discussion: All things Broncos. Last edited by ROYC75; 01-11-2017 at 02:02 PM.. Reason: Change Title, Please?
Posts: 37,087

12-29-2017, 03:39 PM	#19626
staylor26 In Search of a Life staylor26's Avatar Join Date: Oct 2007	Dorsey is not trading down in a shit draft class when he already has a shit ton of picks. He will take the BPA at #1 and with Darnold sounding like he wouldn’t ask the Browns not to pick him, I’d assume it’s a lock it will be him if he comes out.
Posts: 49,969

12-29-2017, 05:28 PM	#19630
staylor26 In Search of a Life staylor26's Avatar Join Date: Oct 2007	Exactly it’s “top heavy”, yet Dorsey is going to trade back for more picks when he already has 5 in the first 2 rounds? The only way he does that if is it’s for a king’s ransom.
Posts: 49,969