|
|
View Poll Results: Statistically speaking from a fantasy perspective who has the biggest year? | |||
Rice |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
38 | 36.89% |
Hollywood |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
62 | 60.19% |
Worthy |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
3 | 2.91% |
Voters: 103. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() ![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#31 |
MVP
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Chandler AZ
|
Here’s conservatively how I see it playing out, and I’m rarely wrong when it comes to WR potential/production:
1) Rice 100 rec, 2000 yds, 20 TDs 2) Brown 90 rec, 1900 yds, 19 TDs 3) Worthy 80 rec, 1800 yds, 18 TDs |
Posts: 13,161
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
Needs more middle fingers
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Diego
|
Rice.
Rice and Kelce will remain your high target, featured work horses. Brown and Worthy will end up being chunky, shot-pay specialists. Rice will have more targets. Brown will have a higher YPC. |
Posts: 64,967
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
Lord of the SB Rings
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Vancouver, B.C. Canada
|
C’mon it’s Brown and Worthy all the way
|
Posts: 1,507
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#34 |
MVP
Join Date: Jan 2015
|
How about GB?
Watson, Reed, Doubs, or Whicks? or the Texans? Diggs, Nico, or Tank? |
Posts: 6,360
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#35 |
Consuming CP souls
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: U.S.A.
|
A turd like Doubs breaking out was frustrating for a bit last year
|
Posts: 69,670
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#36 |
WhatUneed2Hear
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: AllSoulsMatter
|
So is Rice Hollywood Worthy? I think so
|
Posts: 44,783
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#37 |
Live free or die hard
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Durango, CO
|
|
Posts: 26,594
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
|
|