|
|
03-11-2024, 10:31 AM | #2 |
MVP
Join Date: Jan 2015
|
Generally curious to learn your perspective, why?
I'm giving up Sneed for a top 50 pick, and a 4th to move up 20 spots, 10 of which are in the 1st rd to move up for a big-time playmaking WR. I thought that trade was pretty clever. Last edited by Couch-Potato; 03-11-2024 at 11:08 AM.. |
Posts: 6,258
|
03-11-2024, 12:20 PM | #3 | |
MVP
Join Date: Jan 2015
|
Quote:
KC giving up 1300 (counting Sneed as pick #50) PHI giving up 1280 Seems fair. |
|
Posts: 6,258
|
03-11-2024, 07:49 PM | #4 | |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Mar 2006
|
Quote:
They would have been better off just letting him walk for a future 3rd comp. It's a shit trade. Would take 2 mid 3's from Seattle over that. |
|
Posts: 22,227
|
03-11-2024, 07:59 PM | #5 | |
MVP
Join Date: Jan 2015
|
Quote:
I suppose this mock was meant to represent a consolidation of assets to move up for top talent so I hadn't taken much consideration around losing a pick in the Sneed trade as a negative. My thought process is that Sneed is worth a low 1st, and we're getting him at #50 & -20 spots = ~#30. |
|
Posts: 6,258
|
|
|