|
04-14-2017, 10:02 AM | |
SuperBowl or bust
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: BF Iowa
|
The NFL doesn't think Mahomes is a first rounder.
https://mobile.twitter.com/RLiuNFL/s...draft-and-more
There's the list of the 22 prospects that will attend the draft. I'm kinda disappointed that if KC selects Mahomes, he won't be able to go on stage and do his thing...Kizer, Watson and Trubiski were all invited. Odd. |
Posts: 47,478
|
04-14-2017, 10:05 AM | #2 |
Tossed Salad & Scrambled Eggs
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: ATX & OPKS
|
Kizer is going to have a long ass night. Better bring two suits
|
Posts: 20,019
|
04-14-2017, 10:05 AM | #3 |
Admitted Planet Junky
Join Date: Oct 2000
|
hmmm
|
Posts: 19,409
|
04-14-2017, 10:09 AM | #4 |
Most Valuable Villain
Join Date: Dec 2006
|
It'd be nice to see him on stage if KC drafts him....but it's not that big of a deal. Garrett won't be there either.
|
Posts: 92,316
|
04-14-2017, 10:14 AM | #5 |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Oct 2007
|
This made me feel good about his chances of making it to 27, or at least in trade up range.
|
Posts: 50,792
|
04-14-2017, 10:15 AM | #6 |
Most Valuable Villain
Join Date: Dec 2006
|
|
Posts: 92,316
|
04-14-2017, 10:20 AM | #7 |
SuperBowl or bust
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: BF Iowa
|
After hearing a lot of chatter, I wouldn't be surprised if Kizer goes to Arizona in the second.
|
Posts: 47,478
|
04-14-2017, 10:22 AM | #8 |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Oct 2007
|
|
Posts: 50,792
|
04-14-2017, 10:24 AM | #9 |
sorta mod-ish
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: KC North
|
I don't think many really do. We've been looking at Mahomes through the lens of potential, not thinking he would be ready to suit up week one and kick ass.
And really, what is the difference between pick 27 and picks 35-40, anyway? I'd rather us take him (or Kizer or Watson if they're available) and have that fifth year of control over a potential starter for us at QB. |
Posts: 103,555
|
04-14-2017, 10:25 AM | #10 |
SuperBowl or bust
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: BF Iowa
|
|
Posts: 47,478
|
04-14-2017, 10:29 AM | #11 |
Most Valuable Villain
Join Date: Dec 2006
|
I think that Watson is a better fit for Houston than Mahomes. Houston needs someone who could possibly step in right now and give them better than what Osweiler or Savage can. I think Watson could at least be serviceable and get them to the playoffs. Mahomes isn't going to go in there and be able to win.
|
Posts: 92,316
|
04-14-2017, 10:35 AM | #12 | |
SuperBowl or bust
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: BF Iowa
|
Quote:
I agree, I think Watson could go right in and take that team to the playoffs year 1, but I may be wrong. With that defense getting Watt back and an incoming draft class, a guy like Watson is a perfect fit. I'm fine with Mahomes or Watson and if both are selected before we get a chance to draft them, then just wait till next year and load up the defense. Those are the only 2 that I see as guys that can win superbowls with (with the right team around them) |
|
Posts: 47,478
|
04-14-2017, 10:37 AM | #13 | |
Most Valuable Villain
Join Date: Dec 2006
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 92,316
|
04-14-2017, 10:41 AM | #14 |
SuperBowl or bust
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: BF Iowa
|
Osweiler is a guy with a huge chip on his shoulder now.
That contract is stupid, but I could see him doing well in the right situation. If it weren't for that contract, I'd be talking about trading something conditional from next year for him after the draft (if KC doesn't get a QB they like in the draft) Very interesting that Mahomes isn't going to be there for the draft. |
Posts: 47,478
|
04-14-2017, 10:50 AM | #15 |
Most Valuable Villain
Join Date: Dec 2006
|
I still think that the Browns should roll with Osweiler this year. Take Garrett at 1 and take Trubisky at 12 if you want to but don't start him Week 1. Let Osweiler take those shots and get Trubisky learning your offense.
|
Posts: 92,316
|
|
|