Home Discord Chat
Go Back   ChiefsPlanet > Nzoner's Game Room
Register FAQDonate Members List Calendar

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-26-2024, 11:33 AM   Topic Starter
RunKC RunKC is offline
Andy Reid Supporter
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Some owners discussing a QB salary cap separate of the current cap

It seems this is starting to gain popularity.


Quote:
The reasoning, Tom Pelissero explained on "The Rich Eisen Show," is that "at some point you want quarterback numbers to not go over a certain percent of your salary cap." For reference, the Cincinnati Bengals' Joe Burrow earns an an NFL-leading average of $55 million per year on the contract extension he signed in 2023, which means his deal alone is projected to account for an average of nearly 25% of the Bengals' entire salary cap per year, leaving the remaining 75% for the rest of the roster.

Adopting "an NBA model" might be one way to better regulate those percentages, as Pelissero noted. The NBA currently has "max" and "supermax" restrictions for free-agent and long-term contracts, limiting the number of players teams can sign to a certain dollar amount, while capping the percentage of the salary cap for which maximum deals account. The idea "really hasn't gained traction" among NFL owners, however, "in part because so many teams have paid their quarterback," contributing to the position's escalating market.


Which raises another point: If an NFL team feels forced into a cost-prohibitive deal for a quarterback that has yet to warrant the club's total commitment, that team can always simply not sign said quarterback. It's easier said than done in a league where a total quarterback reset brings plenty of risk, prioritizing the unknown over the familiar. If the concern, however, is dedicating too much salary-cap space to one player, then it's up to the organization to zig when the rest of the NFL is zagging. And, hopefully, find a good alternative under center.

Which raises another point: If an NFL team feels forced into a cost-prohibitive deal for a quarterback that has yet to warrant the club's total commitment, that team can always simply not sign said quarterback. It's easier said than done in a league where a total quarterback reset brings plenty of risk, prioritizing the unknown over the familiar. If the concern, however, is dedicating too much salary-cap space to one player, then it's up to the organization to zig when the rest of the NFL is zagging. And, hopefully, find a good alternative under center.
https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/s...er-report/amp/
Posts: 46,490
RunKC is obviously part of the inner Circle.RunKC is obviously part of the inner Circle.RunKC is obviously part of the inner Circle.RunKC is obviously part of the inner Circle.RunKC is obviously part of the inner Circle.RunKC is obviously part of the inner Circle.RunKC is obviously part of the inner Circle.RunKC is obviously part of the inner Circle.RunKC is obviously part of the inner Circle.RunKC is obviously part of the inner Circle.RunKC is obviously part of the inner Circle.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2024, 11:36 AM   #2
RunKC RunKC is offline
Andy Reid Supporter
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
I would fully welcome this. It would raise the Chiefs ceiling way higher. It seems reeruned to put all teams on a level playing field financially by having their QB paid on a different basis.

Teams like the Texans have the perfect opportunity paying Stroud pennies. Imagine if this team had a clean slate on our cap without Mahomes cap hits?

We could possibly win 5 straight Super Bowls
Posts: 46,490
RunKC is obviously part of the inner Circle.RunKC is obviously part of the inner Circle.RunKC is obviously part of the inner Circle.RunKC is obviously part of the inner Circle.RunKC is obviously part of the inner Circle.RunKC is obviously part of the inner Circle.RunKC is obviously part of the inner Circle.RunKC is obviously part of the inner Circle.RunKC is obviously part of the inner Circle.RunKC is obviously part of the inner Circle.RunKC is obviously part of the inner Circle.
Thumbs Up 1 Thumbs Down 0     Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2024, 11:37 AM   #3
PAChiefsGuy PAChiefsGuy is online now
Best Body On ChiefsPlanet
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
That's stupid. They are a part of the team so they should count against the salary cap just like any player.

Just don't sign a QB to a massive deal that they aren't with if you don't want to. Pretty simple.
Posts: 5,957
PAChiefsGuy Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.PAChiefsGuy Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.PAChiefsGuy Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.PAChiefsGuy Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.PAChiefsGuy Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.PAChiefsGuy Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.PAChiefsGuy Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.PAChiefsGuy Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.PAChiefsGuy Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.PAChiefsGuy Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.PAChiefsGuy Forgot to Remove His Claytex and Got Toxic Shock Syndrome.
Thumbs Up 3 Thumbs Down 0     Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2024, 11:51 AM   #4
New World Order New World Order is offline
Choco Favre
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by PAChiefsGuy View Post
That's stupid. They are a part of the team so they should count against the salary cap just like any player.

Just don't sign a QB to a massive deal that they aren't with if you don't want to. Pretty simple.
No

THIS WOULD BE FANTASTIC!!!
Posts: 29,546
New World Order is obviously part of the inner Circle.New World Order is obviously part of the inner Circle.New World Order is obviously part of the inner Circle.New World Order is obviously part of the inner Circle.New World Order is obviously part of the inner Circle.New World Order is obviously part of the inner Circle.New World Order is obviously part of the inner Circle.New World Order is obviously part of the inner Circle.New World Order is obviously part of the inner Circle.New World Order is obviously part of the inner Circle.New World Order is obviously part of the inner Circle.
    Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2024, 02:16 PM   #5
loochy loochy is offline
Hey Loochy, I'm hooome!
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: PooPooKaKaPeePeeShire
Quote:
Originally Posted by PAChiefsGuy View Post
That's stupid. They are a part of the team so they should count against the salary cap just like any player.

Just don't sign a QB to a massive deal that they aren't with if you don't want to. Pretty simple.

This. Just manage your shit. If you can't afford anyone after your QB then it's your fault for having a shitty gm.
Posts: 40,824
loochy is obviously part of the inner Circle.loochy is obviously part of the inner Circle.loochy is obviously part of the inner Circle.loochy is obviously part of the inner Circle.loochy is obviously part of the inner Circle.loochy is obviously part of the inner Circle.loochy is obviously part of the inner Circle.loochy is obviously part of the inner Circle.loochy is obviously part of the inner Circle.loochy is obviously part of the inner Circle.loochy is obviously part of the inner Circle.
    Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2024, 11:39 AM   #6
Mecca Mecca is offline
Hockey Town
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Kansas City, Missouri
Actually I wouldn't be surprised if the Chiefs and Bengals were against this...

The teams that are going to be for it are the teams that are massive cash spenders because it would allow them to spend more money total. The Chiefs even in this age are not a massive cash spending team, on average they come in right around the middle of the pack.

This is a way for teams like Dallas that make the most money to try to be able to outspend other teams.
Posts: 111,350
Mecca is obviously part of the inner Circle.Mecca is obviously part of the inner Circle.Mecca is obviously part of the inner Circle.Mecca is obviously part of the inner Circle.Mecca is obviously part of the inner Circle.Mecca is obviously part of the inner Circle.Mecca is obviously part of the inner Circle.Mecca is obviously part of the inner Circle.Mecca is obviously part of the inner Circle.Mecca is obviously part of the inner Circle.Mecca is obviously part of the inner Circle.
Thumbs Up 1 Thumbs Down 0     Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2024, 12:38 PM   #7
Wisconsin_Chief Wisconsin_Chief is offline
MVP
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mecca View Post
Actually I wouldn't be surprised if the Chiefs and Bengals were against this...

The teams that are going to be for it are the teams that are massive cash spenders because it would allow them to spend more money total. The Chiefs even in this age are not a massive cash spending team, on average they come in right around the middle of the pack.

This is a way for teams like Dallas that make the most money to try to be able to outspend other teams.
Bingo, this would actually put the Chiefs at a disadvantage. I think Mahomes has already fallen to like 4th or 5th on the pay scale, as insane as that is.

I guess I shouldn't call it a disadvantage, because obviously we could build a much better roster, but it definitely would tip the scales a bit for the other teams. It's probably the best option for parity overall, which we know is what they want. If we 3-peat, I would fully expect something like this to be implemented.
Posts: 7,746
Wisconsin_Chief 's phone was tapped by Scott Pioli.Wisconsin_Chief 's phone was tapped by Scott Pioli.Wisconsin_Chief 's phone was tapped by Scott Pioli.Wisconsin_Chief 's phone was tapped by Scott Pioli.Wisconsin_Chief 's phone was tapped by Scott Pioli.Wisconsin_Chief 's phone was tapped by Scott Pioli.Wisconsin_Chief 's phone was tapped by Scott Pioli.Wisconsin_Chief 's phone was tapped by Scott Pioli.Wisconsin_Chief 's phone was tapped by Scott Pioli.Wisconsin_Chief 's phone was tapped by Scott Pioli.Wisconsin_Chief 's phone was tapped by Scott Pioli.
    Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2024, 11:40 AM   #8
RealSNR RealSNR is online now
Special Teams ACE!!!
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Where the hell is SNR
Doesn’t matter. Florio will still shriek and whine and claim we’re cheating by not giving every last dollar to Mahomes
Posts: 90,924
RealSNR is obviously part of the inner Circle.RealSNR is obviously part of the inner Circle.RealSNR is obviously part of the inner Circle.RealSNR is obviously part of the inner Circle.RealSNR is obviously part of the inner Circle.RealSNR is obviously part of the inner Circle.RealSNR is obviously part of the inner Circle.RealSNR is obviously part of the inner Circle.RealSNR is obviously part of the inner Circle.RealSNR is obviously part of the inner Circle.RealSNR is obviously part of the inner Circle.
    Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2024, 11:41 AM   #9
Sassy Squatch Sassy Squatch is offline
The man you could post like.
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Jerry is super ass hurt about Dak holding the Cowboys over a barrel
Posts: 38,176
Sassy Squatch is obviously part of the inner Circle.Sassy Squatch is obviously part of the inner Circle.Sassy Squatch is obviously part of the inner Circle.Sassy Squatch is obviously part of the inner Circle.Sassy Squatch is obviously part of the inner Circle.Sassy Squatch is obviously part of the inner Circle.Sassy Squatch is obviously part of the inner Circle.Sassy Squatch is obviously part of the inner Circle.Sassy Squatch is obviously part of the inner Circle.Sassy Squatch is obviously part of the inner Circle.Sassy Squatch is obviously part of the inner Circle.
Thumbs Up 1 Thumbs Down 0     Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2024, 11:52 AM   #10
RunKC RunKC is offline
Andy Reid Supporter
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Mahomes cap hit this year is $45 million while CJ Stroud is just north of $2 million. That $43 ish million disparity is the best chance they have to load up their team like any team with a good QB on a rookie contract.

You’re pretty much erasing the best advantage teams have for parity. Great for us with Mahomes though
Posts: 46,490
RunKC is obviously part of the inner Circle.RunKC is obviously part of the inner Circle.RunKC is obviously part of the inner Circle.RunKC is obviously part of the inner Circle.RunKC is obviously part of the inner Circle.RunKC is obviously part of the inner Circle.RunKC is obviously part of the inner Circle.RunKC is obviously part of the inner Circle.RunKC is obviously part of the inner Circle.RunKC is obviously part of the inner Circle.RunKC is obviously part of the inner Circle.
Thumbs Up 1 Thumbs Down 0     Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2024, 04:10 PM   #11
Pasta Little Brioni Pasta Little Brioni is offline
Consuming CP souls
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: U.S.A.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RunKC View Post
Mahomes cap hit this year is $45 million while CJ Stroud is just north of $2 million. That $43 ish million disparity is the best chance they have to load up their team like any team with a good QB on a rookie contract.

You’re pretty much erasing the best advantage teams have for parity. Great for us with Mahomes though
And? We'll still whoop their ass
Posts: 69,409
Pasta Little Brioni is obviously part of the inner Circle.Pasta Little Brioni is obviously part of the inner Circle.Pasta Little Brioni is obviously part of the inner Circle.Pasta Little Brioni is obviously part of the inner Circle.Pasta Little Brioni is obviously part of the inner Circle.Pasta Little Brioni is obviously part of the inner Circle.Pasta Little Brioni is obviously part of the inner Circle.Pasta Little Brioni is obviously part of the inner Circle.Pasta Little Brioni is obviously part of the inner Circle.Pasta Little Brioni is obviously part of the inner Circle.Pasta Little Brioni is obviously part of the inner Circle.
    Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2024, 04:11 PM   #12
Pasta Little Brioni Pasta Little Brioni is offline
Consuming CP souls
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: U.S.A.
Not for rewarding dumb **** teams paying Dak, Lawrence, Dan Jones, as much as the GOAT Pat. Dumb ****s....it is fine the way it is.
Posts: 69,409
Pasta Little Brioni is obviously part of the inner Circle.Pasta Little Brioni is obviously part of the inner Circle.Pasta Little Brioni is obviously part of the inner Circle.Pasta Little Brioni is obviously part of the inner Circle.Pasta Little Brioni is obviously part of the inner Circle.Pasta Little Brioni is obviously part of the inner Circle.Pasta Little Brioni is obviously part of the inner Circle.Pasta Little Brioni is obviously part of the inner Circle.Pasta Little Brioni is obviously part of the inner Circle.Pasta Little Brioni is obviously part of the inner Circle.Pasta Little Brioni is obviously part of the inner Circle.
Thumbs Up 1 Thumbs Down 0     Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2024, 11:48 AM   #13
MarkDavis'Haircut MarkDavis'Haircut is offline
MVP
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
The league, by hyper focusing on offense and QBs since the 90s, already established a lack of parity. The one thing that helped to keep elite QBs in check was the salary cap. A franchise couldn't emulate the superteams of the 1970s.

Removing the QB salary from the equation further the divide. Sure, it is great for a team when they currently have a top five guy, but we all know how up and down the QB coaster can be. If other fans are tired of Brady and Mahomes style dynasties than this proposal virtually guarantees them. Remember, when Brady didn't win another Super Bowl after becoming a highly paid player. His title wins returned after taking a pay cut.

Imagine the Chiefs with Mahomes' salary not impacting the cap. He already overcome drops and the most penalty yardage to win a Super Bowl with the assistance of an elite defense. I have no desire to see Fat Andy reload with bombs and Spags rearming his corps.

No foresight or future thinking in the NFL. The owners want a bailout because they overpaid average QBs.
Posts: 14,375
MarkDavis'Haircut is obviously part of the inner Circle.MarkDavis'Haircut is obviously part of the inner Circle.MarkDavis'Haircut is obviously part of the inner Circle.MarkDavis'Haircut is obviously part of the inner Circle.MarkDavis'Haircut is obviously part of the inner Circle.MarkDavis'Haircut is obviously part of the inner Circle.MarkDavis'Haircut is obviously part of the inner Circle.MarkDavis'Haircut is obviously part of the inner Circle.MarkDavis'Haircut is obviously part of the inner Circle.MarkDavis'Haircut is obviously part of the inner Circle.MarkDavis'Haircut is obviously part of the inner Circle.
Thumbs Up 1 Thumbs Down 0     Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2024, 11:48 AM   #14
RedinTexas RedinTexas is offline
Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Texas
I don't understand how you put a salary cap at a single position. It makes sense with an entire team because you spend more at some positions and less at others. How do you do a cap at just QB? If they're just going to set a limit on how much QBs can be paid, why would the QBs go along with it? Am I the only one here?
Posts: 1,842
RedinTexas would the whole thing.RedinTexas would the whole thing.RedinTexas would the whole thing.RedinTexas would the whole thing.RedinTexas would the whole thing.RedinTexas would the whole thing.RedinTexas would the whole thing.RedinTexas would the whole thing.RedinTexas would the whole thing.RedinTexas would the whole thing.RedinTexas would the whole thing.
    Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2024, 11:50 AM   #15
Mecca Mecca is offline
Hockey Town
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Kansas City, Missouri
Quote:
Originally Posted by RedinTexas View Post
I don't understand how you put a salary cap at a single position. It makes sense with an entire team because you spend more at some positions and less at others. How do you do a cap at just QB? If they're just going to set a limit on how much QBs can be paid, why would the QBs go along with it? Am I the only one here?
It would basically be like the NBA salary cap, like an exception. His accounted for number isn't what he actually makes.

So your super stupidly paid QB only accounts for something like 7% of your cap.
Posts: 111,350
Mecca is obviously part of the inner Circle.Mecca is obviously part of the inner Circle.Mecca is obviously part of the inner Circle.Mecca is obviously part of the inner Circle.Mecca is obviously part of the inner Circle.Mecca is obviously part of the inner Circle.Mecca is obviously part of the inner Circle.Mecca is obviously part of the inner Circle.Mecca is obviously part of the inner Circle.Mecca is obviously part of the inner Circle.Mecca is obviously part of the inner Circle.
    Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.