View Single Post
Old 03-26-2024, 08:38 PM   #295
kcbubb kcbubb is offline
Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
I don’t think you’ll have to go into the teens. If that’s the case, bpa, but I’m guessing one of the top 6 LT prospects could be drafted 20-25. My favorite is Mims but if he goes early, then Fautana. If Fautana is gone, then Guyton. I think LT is worth taking a risk on one of those guys 20-25. I’m guessing one of those 3 will be available in that range.

Quote:
Originally Posted by duncan_idaho View Post
I think that’s a function of the depth and quality at each position.

There are several WRs who could be available at 32 or in reasonable move-up range for the Chiefs.

To get a Lt you feel really good about, you might have to go into the teens - and that costs a LOT more to do.

I mean, if Fauntanu goes to the Saints at 14 because they like him at LT, are you trading into the teens to ensure you get Morgan or possibly even Suamataia? Because those are the next two names at LT then…

Paying more to get a more risky player is tough to swallow when WR is just as big of a long-term need.
Posts: 2,367
kcbubb < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.kcbubb < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.kcbubb < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.kcbubb < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.kcbubb < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.kcbubb < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.kcbubb < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.kcbubb < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.kcbubb < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.kcbubb < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.kcbubb < Tried to steal Andy's chili fries.
    Reply With Quote