Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Meck
DUDE. Yes, we have less than ideal personnel. YES we need quicker, faster d-linemen. NO a 4-3 isn't the answer because we're likely to be in it less than 30% of the time anyway.
|
There's a fundamental shift in the player acquisition process in a base scheme switch.
Your plan is to carry both small, fast D-linemen along with 5-techs? Along with smaller, quicker LB's? And a NT or two? There's only so many roster spots, dude. And you're not using your "43" line 30% of the time. You're using it 100% of the time. That's the whole point! Lol.
You can't have it both ways.
A major component in the scheme switch is that you don't have to have guys who only play "30% of the time" like we do now.
You get it? Maybe im just not explaining clear enough. Can someone else spell this out better?