Quote:
Originally Posted by Kiimosabi
I may be wrong but I'd much rather have Teddy than Foles.
Foles has demonstrated a lot more history of being bad than that one game where they won it all.
|
It’s a trade off of pros/cons with those two IMO
Teddy seems more consistent but is also seemingly fragile
Foles comes up big in big games, but looks pedestrian the rest of the time... he does have the benefit of knowing Nagys system though
All that said, either one is a huge upgrade from Mitch... they can’t really go wrong here