View Single Post
Old 03-17-2024, 10:11 PM   #989
gordonelloyd gordonelloyd is offline
Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coogs View Post
For including FAU and our 1st in the starting point for talking to the Bears about #9, and guage what else they might be asking for to complete the deal?

As an example. Last years 1st (FAU), this years 1st, and next years 1st for #9? Is that too much? Not enough? For a possible shot at Joe Alt, and at worst get one of the other two guys Crow mentioned?
I don’t see why anyone would have any interest in FAU. He didn’t show anything last year. It looks like he was a mistake. No way the Bears would trade a number 9 this year for our number 1 this year and next year. And adding in FAU isn’t going to be seen as meaningful.

I think the way things are playing out we should keep Sneed. But if we can parlay him into a low draft pick then to get a LT that would be great. But it doesn’t seem to be working out that way.

And keeping him will be great for our three peat. but we need to get Smith back at left tackle.
Posts: 223
gordonelloyd ....proof positive that somebody pissed in the gene pool.gordonelloyd ....proof positive that somebody pissed in the gene pool.
    Reply With Quote