View Single Post
Old 04-03-2020, 10:46 AM   #16110
AustinChief AustinChief is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Austin
Quote:
Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins View Post
It's 0.17, but it's near the upper bound of the 95% CI (2 sd). He's also not accounting for there being more cases which would push the CFR down or the estimate being near the lower bound of the 95% CI.

For his numbers to be true the number of cases would have to be exactly on the estimate and the CFR would have to be two standard deviations above the estimate.
Nice try. Standard douchebag Hamas walk back. So, your post calling me a liar has now become a post saying that although it is entirely possible that a bad flu season can have a fatality rate in the .16% range it isn't likely.

Quote:
Originally Posted by AustinChief View Post
reports are showing fatality rates for people under 50 to be equivalent to a bad flu season,
Quote:
Originally Posted by TLO View Post
Is this true?
Quote:
Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins View Post
No.
You just can't help being a total **** can you?
Posts: 19,582
AustinChief is obviously part of the inner Circle.AustinChief is obviously part of the inner Circle.AustinChief is obviously part of the inner Circle.AustinChief is obviously part of the inner Circle.AustinChief is obviously part of the inner Circle.AustinChief is obviously part of the inner Circle.AustinChief is obviously part of the inner Circle.AustinChief is obviously part of the inner Circle.AustinChief is obviously part of the inner Circle.AustinChief is obviously part of the inner Circle.AustinChief is obviously part of the inner Circle.
    Reply With Quote