Quote:
Originally Posted by Dartgod
I'm not going to ban you from the thread because this is your first post in it and your posting history doesn't indicate you spend much time, if any at all, in the DC forum.
But please keep the political BS out of this thread, ok?
|
Apologies...I didn't think my post was political or partisan in nature. I was simply trying to explain to the two in the back and forth circle jerk about the fact that depending on how you look at it, they were BOTH likely right and just arguing semantics. Will tread more lightly I suppose.
That being said, I do think its an important and salient point that the model they are using that everyone is seeing headlines about has a lot of depth and isn't just a dead on result. The numbers could get worse, but they could also be a lot better considering most of the data the model is using is skewed by projections from the hard hit areas.