Quote:
Originally Posted by saphojunkie
Of course not. I think the point is that sitting four years didn't help him be this instant force.
For instance, Wilson and Big Ben both won the super bowl in year two without sitting. Rodgers - arguably more talented - sat four years and it still took three years to win.
I just think there's no hard and fast rule for any of this.
|
Rodgers should be happy.
He sat for three years behind a Hall of Famer and had zero wear and tear on his body.
It won't be long before he's the highest paid player in the history of the game, which probably doesn't happen if he started in 2005.