ChiefsPlanet
Page 11 of 52 « First 78910 11 1213141521 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs NFL trade watch (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=324629)

-King- 08-24-2019 01:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by New World Order (Post 14407145)
It's not like he had a ton of offensive help.

For a while he had Pinkston, Thrash and Freddie Mitchell as his receivers. The one complete year he had a dynamic receiving weapon in TO they went to the SB

Had he had Patrick Mahomes in 2004, he would most likely have a ring right now.
He would. Patrick mahomes plays his ass off late in games. He wouldn't be throwing up like McNabb was.

Pitt Gorilla 08-24-2019 03:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlorentinePogen (Post 14407023)
Who started this jackass rumor about trading Tyreek?
Does it matter? If you’re dumb enough to believe such nonsense, football is likely the least of your worries in life.

Pitt Gorilla 08-24-2019 03:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 14406872)
I agree. Mahomes got Albert Wilson and Chris Conley paid. He lost Kareem Hunt and Sammy Watkins for half the season and still put up tons of points.

That’s why Chris Jones is more valuable than Tyreek Hill. You can replicate a lot of Tyreek Hill with Pat and Andy. Just look at the potential of Mecole Hardman. I don’t think this team could find another Chris Jones.

This team has no problem drafting and fitting offensive talent. They can’t find/fit defensive talent anywhere near the same frequency.
Jesus Christ.

CasselGotPeedOn 08-24-2019 04:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 14406872)
I agree. Mahomes got Albert Wilson and Chris Conley paid. He lost Kareem Hunt and Sammy Watkins for half the season and still put up tons of points.

That’s why Chris Jones is more valuable than Tyreek Hill. You can replicate a lot of Tyreek Hill with Pat and Andy. Just look at the potential of Mecole Hardman. I don’t think this team could find another Chris Jones.

This team has no problem drafting and fitting offensive talent. They can’t find/fit defensive talent anywhere near the same frequency.
Hill is a first ballot HOF type of talent. Is Chris Jones?

O.city 08-24-2019 04:34 PM
I know what terez said but I still kinda have a sneaking suspicion that a hill for clowney deal is or atleast has been discussed

Bump 08-24-2019 04:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by O.city (Post 14407298)
I know what terez said but I still kinda have a sneaking suspicion that a hill for clowney deal is or atleast has been discussed
would be mad if true

Chief Roundup 08-24-2019 04:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by O.city (Post 14407298)
I know what terez said but I still kinda have a sneaking suspicion that a hill for clowney deal is or atleast has been discussed
Dude you need to stop with all this stuff.

JakeF 08-24-2019 04:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by CasselGotPeedOn (Post 14407281)
Hill is a first ballot HOF type of talent. Is Chris Jones?
Doubtful, Chris Jones was weak against the run last year. He sold out last year to get sacks so he could get a bigger contract. He said '**** it' and went all out for the QB whether it hurt our run defense or not. Chris Jones seem to do most of his damage by abusing centers. He was so quick he could lineup over the center and get through the gap before the center could close it off. I'm not sure he gets to do that in a 4-3 scheme. I would like to see Jones show a complete game before giving him a big contract.

I'm not concerned with Hill on the field at all. As long as the Chiefs protect themselves with Hill off the field in the next contract it's all good. We don't trade Hill until at least one tag year. By then we should know if Mahomes will make everyone good or if Hill is the exception

O.city 08-24-2019 04:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chief Roundup (Post 14407304)
Dude you need to stop with all this stuff.
There's been alot of smoke about Hill being traded. With that much smoke, there could very well be fire somewhere.

smithandrew051 08-24-2019 04:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by O.city (Post 14407298)
I know what terez said but I still kinda have a sneaking suspicion that a hill for clowney deal is or atleast has been discussed
If that’s a 1 for 1 trade, then everyone in the Chiefs organization needs to be fired...even down to the equipment managers. Anyone associated with the organization that makes that trade needs to be blackballed from ever working anywhere ever again.

Pitt Gorilla 08-24-2019 04:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by O.city (Post 14407298)
I know what terez said but I still kinda have a sneaking suspicion that a hill for clowney deal is or atleast has been discussed
That’s a fireable offense. Veach is stupid, but he’s nowhere near that stupid.

O.city 08-24-2019 04:49 PM
It definitely wouldn't make sense in terms of strengthening a team you would have to beat in the playoffs.

ROYC75 08-24-2019 04:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SAUTO (Post 14406791)
ROFL.

It wouldn't make any sense to trade hill right now.
All of this.

It would take a boat load of cash, several pics for the Chiefs to do this.

That's not happening, Hill is one dumb bitch away from being out of football for a while.

O.city 08-24-2019 04:50 PM
A troubled WR off the field that they don't want to pay for a pass rusher isn't as crazy as you guys are making it out to be.

Pitt Gorilla 08-24-2019 04:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by O.city (Post 14407313)
A troubled WR off the field that they don't want to pay for a pass rusher isn't as crazy as you guys are making it out to be.
You pay Hill a million times before you pay Clowney.

Go sleep it off, man.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:11 AM.
Page 11 of 52 « First 78910 11 1213141521 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.