We're all idiots, but let's talk Nick Foles compensatory pick.
I have a repository of the picks the Chiefs probably have that I'll now have to update.
We traded for Fuller and an additional 3rd. Secondly, the Foles pick, once projected as a 6th (or a 5th with meaningful playing time) by Over the Cap, now may be worth as much as a 3rd. Bullet to your head, how much do you think Foles nets us? |
Fifth. No way its upgraded to a third
|
If the Packers are only expected to get a 5th for J.C. Tretter, a guy who played 100% of the snaps and makes around $5.5M per year, I have hard time imagining Foles, with his 800 fewer snaps and $5.5M dollar salary, netting a larger comp pick.
|
i think a 4th
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
5th. He was a bubble guy at 5 v 6. It's probably going to be a 5th now. That's' as far as that wheel rolls.
|
Quote:
What would the Eagles be without Nick Foles? |
The Chiefs received 4 Comp Picks in 2017 for Jeff Allen, Donald Stephenson, Tyvon Branch and Sean Smith.
A 3rd, 5th and two 6th's. Surely, Foles is worth at least a 4th. |
Quote:
As far as I know it mostly cares about how many players a team signed/lost, how much $ those players signed for, and how many snaps they played. |
Quote:
Foles appeared in 3 Post Season games, including the Super Bowl, so add at least another 210 snap counts to that total. Also, try using your own brain for once instead parrotting all of the Bronco homers you blow every day. |
You have no idea exactly how the formula is weighted, you dingus. Some guy on twitter has no idea how to break down a method that escapes people that work for teams.
**** off already |
Quote:
Quote:
Sit down and shut the **** up. |
Quote:
http://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/snapcounts SB 52 is the ONLY game missing from their snap count data, so add another 60-70 snaps to Foles' 212 snaps |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:07 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.