ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Saccopoo Memorial Draft Forum (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=29)
-   -   Duncan Idaho's Compendium of Comprehensive Offseason Plans (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=351656)

duncan_idaho 01-03-2024 12:05 PM

Duncan Idaho's Compendium of Comprehensive Offseason Plans
 
Offseason Plan: Version 5.0

Now with more Chris Jones, for sure, and an understanding of his contract. And Drue Tranquill on contract.

Cut
WR Marquez Valdes-Scantling
DE Charles Omenihu (last time, I said this stunk. Hearing him saying today that he thinks he should be paid like the guys in the tier right behind Nick Bosa makes it a pretty no-brainer. He clearly isn’t in a spot to do a small extension. So cut him loose.)

Extend
S Justin Reid (4/$49M – I stick to the restructure of Reid in this run. He’s just so solid and good and reliable, and the secondary still needs a veteran leader.)

Tag and Trade
CB L’Jarius Sneed (this time, I send him to the Vikings for #42 because that’s fun)

Trade
WR Kadarius Toney (2025 conditional 6th)

Let Walk
Mike Edwards
Derrick Nnadi
Willie Gay
Jerick McKinnon
Clyde Edwards-Helaire
Blake Bell
Richie James
Deon Bush
Tommy Townsend (we don’t need him any more, we have the Dolphin)
Jody Fortson
Prince Tega-Wanogho

Re-Sign
Tershawn Wharton (3 years, $9.5M – The DT room is thin even with Jones back, and watching the SB we really saw what I thought was Wharton’s best game. I like having a DT with that burst and speed, and he has clearly gotten much stronger, and he is athletic enough to run some DE snaps in a pinch)
James Winchester (minimal deal)
Malik Herring (ERFA tender)
Jack Cochrane (ERFA tender)
Nazeeh Johnson (ERFA tender)
Mike Caliendo (ERFA tender)

FA Moves
QB Trevor Siemian (1/$1.7M – veteran QB)
DE Yetur Gross-Matos (1/$1.6M – just seems like a good bet for KC as a Spags-type DE who is a Veach reclamation attempt special to boot)
OT Yosh Nijman (2/$12.3M – I just am not comfortable going into the draft with only Wanya Morris and a rookie at LT. Nijman provides a little veteran depth with some upside).

With these deals done, I’m still sitting on about $22M of cap space without restructuring Mahomes at all. I’ve added draft capital and addressed LT insurance/depth with a vet I think can be at least AVERAGE at LT.

I still dive back in at this point for WR Darnell Mooney at 1/$8M , with incentives up to $12M. That still leaves me about $15M in cap space, which I could use to sign draft picks and hunt for June 1 cuts/late FA bargains. I’m tempted to go get Teair Tartt in this cycle but hold off.

Getting into the season without touching Mahomes deal at ALL is going to really help with flexibility in 2025, when it’s going to be needed due to the Jones situation being added to the books.

Draft
Needs based on plan so far:
As before, we’re still looking at a pretty set roster that doesn’t have any glaring needs but needs to invest at DT, WR, and LT.

Simulator used: NFL Mock Draft Database (best aggregated big board at this point)

1.32: Kingsley Suamataia, LT, BYU. Suamataia needs seasoning, but his upside is high and he checks the size, arm length, and athleticism boxes to be a good long-term LT for the Chiefs.

2.42: Roman Wilson, WR, Michigan. This might be high
OK, this might be a bit of a reach. But Wilson is someone I haven’t mocked to KC before and I do think his speed, explosiveness, and ability to make cuts at top speed make him a good fit for KC’s offense. With Mooney only signed for one year, Wilson would be on hand with experience under his belt for 2025 and beyond for that role.

Also considered: Xavier Legette, WR, South Carolina. I probably would go here like I did in my last mock, but I wanted to switch it up.

2.64 Sedrick Van Pran, IOL, Georgia. Here’s a new one. I considered dipping for another WR here (hothead Jermain Burton!) but instead stick on the OL. The Jones decision is going to come with consequences on other players, and I may need to account for them. Van Pran can be a stud C or a good G. If Humphrey walks, you’re covered. If Smith walks, you’re covered. If they cut Thuney to keep Smith and Humphrey, you’re covered. If they need to move Humphrey off C because of Snaps, you’re covered.

3.95 McKinnley Jackson, DT, Texas A&M Big bulky dude to help replace Nnadi.

4.131 Brenden Rice, WR, USC. His 40 at the combine was a disappointment, but I still like his size and ability to work the scramble drill. Great bloodlines, great work ethic, and I think he’s faster than his 40.

5.158 Deantre Prince, CB, Ole Miss. I missed on the round 2 and round 3 CB values/fits. His size/speed/athletic profile tracks with the Day 3 gems the Chiefs have been finding. Let’s keep it rolling.

5.172 Isaac Guerendo, RB, Louisville. I am not first to the Guerendo train, but I’m on it. Size/speed combo is great. I doubt he actually makes it here, though.

7.250 Gabe Hall, DT, Baylor. I like Hall’s size and athletic ability. Seemed worthwhile for a Day 3 stab.

Wrapping it up

This will be my last offseason exercise. I’m pretty stoked about where KC lands in this, honestly.

Two-deep (Re-signed,FA adds, rookies)

(2) QB: Mahomes/Siemian
(3) RB: Pacheco/Guerendo/Prince
(6) WR: Rice, Mooney, Wilson/ Watson, Rice, Moore
(3) TE: Kelce/Gray/min contract vet

(2) OT: Nijman/Suamataia

(2) OG: Thuney/Morris
(1) C: Humphrey/Van Pran
(2) RG: Smith/Caliendo
(2) RT: Taylor/Morris

(6) DE: Karlaftis, Anudike-Uzomah, Gross-Matos, Harring, Thompsonsmall contract vet
(5) DT: Jones,Wharton,Farrell, Jackson ,Hall

(5) LB: Bolton, Tranquill, Chenal, Cochrane, Jones

(6) CB: McDuffie, Williams, Watson, Johnson, Jones, Prince
(4) S: Reid, Cook, Conner, inexpensive vet, probably Deon Bush

(1) LS: Winchester
(1) K: Butker
(1) P: The Dolphin

That leaves 1 spot floating if my count is right, probably goes to depth at OL or maybe another DB who is a special teams asset.

The defense still is built around Chris Jones and I know that DE room is going to make some people nervous. I’d be looking for some training camp cuts/late FA additions to beef that spot up some more. The LB corps is still a strong one (and still one of the better ones in the NFL, if not quite as versatile in base with Willie Gay presumably making a lot of money elsewhere), and the secondary is still a strength (probably a little stronger at S in 24 than it was in 23, with Reid, Conner, and Cook, but obviously turning things over at CB).

I’d feel good about the chances for a 3-peat with this one, and I think KC would be the preseason favorite in this run. Defense is still strong, offense got a bunch of help.

Looking ahead to 25, I haven’t addressed Bolton-Humphrey-Smith. In light of the Jones signing and structure, I don’t think they can keep 2 any more. Might just be one… and maybe neither of the OL.

Offseason Plan: Version 4.0
Spoiler!


Offseason Plan: Version 3.0

Spoiler!
Spoiler!

Offseason Plan: Version 2.0

Spoiler!


Offseason Plan: Version 1.0
Spoiler!

RunKC 01-03-2024 12:13 PM

Looks nice. I'd be good with that.

I'd love to add Isaiah Simmons to the LB room. Only 25, 1st rd pick and has all the athleticism Willie Gay has.

duncan_idaho 01-03-2024 12:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 17316780)
Looks nice. I'd be good with that.

I'd love to add Isaiah Simmons to the LB room. Only 25, 1st rd pick and has all the athleticism Willie Gay has.

That's a good call. He'd be interesting, for sure, to see what Spagnuolo can do with him.

duncan_idaho 01-04-2024 09:05 AM

Made a major mistake in this run through, scrapping Justin Watson from my mind. Subbing him for Hardman.

O.city 01-04-2024 09:16 AM

Brown has also missed games with injury every year.

DJ's left nut 01-04-2024 09:32 AM

I really REALLY like Egbuka - been trying to build a little momentum around him for a month or so.

And if you were to sign Hollywood as a FA, you truly couldn't make a better pick than Egbuka. I mean maybe one of the bigger bodied guys might float some boats, but I just don't care that much about height. Mahomes isn't gonna YOLO balls for guys to go up and get very often.

And if he has Rice, Brown and Egbuka out there getting open, it'll simply never be necessary. Those are three extremely complementary guys with very specific strengths but at the same time they're not LIMITED to those areas of strength.

MVS, for instance, is (was) a genuine deep threat but ONLY a deep threat. JJSS was a solid underneath receiver but ONLY an underneath receiver. Rice is a dynamic underneath catch and run threat, Brown is a dynamic deep threat, Egbuka is a silky route-runner who will be outstanding at finding separation at his break all over the field. But ALL of them can do anything else on occasion you'd ask from them. All three of those guys can catch a ball underneath or deep or run a bubble screen.

That would be an awfully good group of weapons.

Didn't Lachey say he was returning to Iowa? And honestly, Iowa TEs have done so well of late that I feel like he'll get a boost into the late 2nd. LaPorta is gonna make him some money.

Tart's another guy I've been trying to get people to pay attention to - I think he'd be a real nice pickup. I'd love to see another complementary DL either on the 2nd day or in FA (even if it's a DE who moves Omenihu to the inside on a semi-permanent basis) but you seem to have used Gaines for that. I'm just not a Gaines guy. Wasn't last season, am not now. I don't see what some others see in him - he's a complete JAG who MIGHT provide a small upgrade on Nnadi but even that's not something I'm sure of.

Good effort, sir. I'll get to work on willing Egbuka into existence.

O.city 01-04-2024 09:37 AM

I really like Egbuka....in that I think he could end up being the guy from this draft that goes in that Justin Jefferson slot and ends up being better than some of those that go in front of him.

I would rather have Odunze, but that's a pipe dream.

duncan_idaho 01-04-2024 11:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 17318046)
Brown has also missed games with injury every year.

No, he played in 18/18 games in 2020. He misssed 3 games total in Baltimore. I think he's a mostly durable guy who the turf monster in Arizona beat down.

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 17318068)
I really REALLY like Egbuka - been trying to build a little momentum around him for a month or so.

And if you were to sign Hollywood as a FA, you truly couldn't make a better pick than Egbuka. I mean maybe one of the bigger bodied guys might float some boats, but I just don't care that much about height. Mahomes isn't gonna YOLO balls for guys to go up and get very often.

And if he has Rice, Brown and Egbuka out there getting open, it'll simply never be necessary. Those are three extremely complementary guys with very specific strengths but at the same time they're not LIMITED to those areas of strength.

MVS, for instance, is (was) a genuine deep threat but ONLY a deep threat. JJSS was a solid underneath receiver but ONLY an underneath receiver. Rice is a dynamic underneath catch and run threat, Brown is a dynamic deep threat, Egbuka is a silky route-runner who will be outstanding at finding separation at his break all over the field. But ALL of them can do anything else on occasion you'd ask from them. All three of those guys can catch a ball underneath or deep or run a bubble screen.

That would be an awfully good group of weapons.

Didn't Lachey say he was returning to Iowa? And honestly, Iowa TEs have done so well of late that I feel like he'll get a boost into the late 2nd. LaPorta is gonna make him some money.

Tart's another guy I've been trying to get people to pay attention to - I think he'd be a real nice pickup. I'd love to see another complementary DL either on the 2nd day or in FA (even if it's a DE who moves Omenihu to the inside on a semi-permanent basis) but you seem to have used Gaines for that. I'm just not a Gaines guy. Wasn't last season, am not now. I don't see what some others see in him - he's a complete JAG who MIGHT provide a small upgrade on Nnadi but even that's not something I'm sure of.

Good effort, sir. I'll get to work on willing Egbuka into existence.

That's where I'm at re: the WRs. I hadn't seen that re: Lachey but will be sad if true. That's probably good. I should have been more disciplined and taken a DT there.

On Gaines, I'm just looking for a generally competent guy to slot in there. Not set on him. I do really like Tart, though, and think he could be the type of signing that really outplays his contract.

KC needs a move or 2 this offseason that pay off like Trey Hendrickson for the Bengals, to really get the inevitable nature of things back together.

LoneWolf 01-04-2024 11:24 AM

The only thing I don't agree with is your comment that in your scenario you have no intention of signing Bolton to another contract when his rookie contract is up. I think KC needs to find a way to keep him long term. He's the QB of the defense and if they have to cut a guy like Reid after next year to create the room to afford Bolton, so be it.

JPH83 01-04-2024 11:28 AM

I'm with DJ on Gaines. Options I'd like to explore at DT are:

Daquan Jones - been injured i think there's a discount there.
Maurice Hurst - Same, would look to pay minimum. He might only give you 300 snaps but it's at a near elite level. If he's rotational I'd swing.
Michael Pierce - Has had a great year, I think you can get him around $6-7m a year and he'd be well worth it.
Chris Wormley - Has he retired? I guess the theme is taking a risk on guys who've been injured. Probably I'd want someone like Pierce and then one of those riskier, cheaper options.

Egbuka I really like. But...I'd also really like a guy whose played more on the outside. Might not matter with Holywood and I'm not saying he CAN'T do it. But if he can he might go before our pick anyway.

DJ's left nut 01-04-2024 11:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 17318218)
No, he played in 18/18 games in 2020. He misssed 3 games total in Baltimore. I think he's a mostly durable guy who the turf monster in Arizona beat down.



That's where I'm at re: the WRs. I hadn't seen that re: Lachey but will be sad if true. That's probably good. I should have been more disciplined and taken a DT there.

On Gaines, I'm just looking for a generally competent guy to slot in there. Not set on him. I do really like Tart, though, and think he could be the type of signing that really outplays his contract.

KC needs a move or 2 this offseason that pay off like Trey Hendrickson for the Bengals, to really get the inevitable nature of things back together.

I think I'm alone on the Gabe Davis bandwagon, but that's why I like him. I think he can outplay whatever deal he ends up signing. But I do see the concerns there in that he's not really an all-fields player. He's mostly a seam stretcher/deep guy. A younger and IMO, better, MVS. And frankly, a slightly better version of the 2022 MVS would be a god-sent for this offense. If that's ALL he is, it's still a hell of an add to the WR room.

Mecca 01-04-2024 11:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 17318269)
I think I'm alone on the Gabe Davis bandwagon, but that's why I like him. I think he can outplay whatever deal he ends up signing. But I do see the concerns there in that he's not really an all-fields player. He's mostly a seam stretcher/deep guy. A younger and IMO, better, MVS. And frankly, a slightly better version of the 2022 MVS would be a god-sent for this offense. If that's ALL he is, it's still a hell of an add to the WR room.

Gabe Davis is 7 for 150 and 2 or 0 for 0 for 0, dude is weird as hell.

duncan_idaho 01-04-2024 12:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LoneWolf (Post 17318255)
The only thing I don't agree with is your comment that in your scenario you have no intention of signing Bolton to another contract when his rookie contract is up. I think KC needs to find a way to keep him long term. He's the QB of the defense and if they have to cut a guy like Reid after next year to create the room to afford Bolton, so be it.

I love Nick and have for a long time. I'm a well-known Mizzou honk on here.

BUT... I still see a guy who is at best a "eh, he's OK" option as a pass defender. His instincts are next level and I think they play him up until he starts to decline physically.

But if he's fooled, or pulled out of position by his assignment, he just doesn't have the raw speed/range to recover quickly. And he's still pretty limited as a pass defender.

I just don't see how you can pay him big money on a long-term deal when that's the case.

Depends on what he's asking, but I assume it's going to be more than I'm comfortable with.

Quote:

Originally Posted by JPH83 (Post 17318266)
I'm with DJ on Gaines. Options I'd like to explore at DT are:

Daquan Jones - been injured i think there's a discount there.
Maurice Hurst - Same, would look to pay minimum. He might only give you 300 snaps but it's at a near elite level. If he's rotational I'd swing.
Michael Pierce - Has had a great year, I think you can get him around $6-7m a year and he'd be well worth it.
Chris Wormley - Has he retired? I guess the theme is taking a risk on guys who've been injured. Probably I'd want someone like Pierce and then one of those riskier, cheaper options.

Egbuka I really like. But...I'd also really like a guy whose played more on the outside. Might not matter with Holywood and I'm not saying he CAN'T do it. But if he can he might go before our pick anyway.

I like those DT names just fine. And Egbuka is a 6-1/200 guy and comes from a program that has done a good job developing guys who can win inside and out.

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 17318269)
I think I'm alone on the Gabe Davis bandwagon, but that's why I like him. I think he can outplay whatever deal he ends up signing. But I do see the concerns there in that he's not really an all-fields player. He's mostly a seam stretcher/deep guy. A younger and IMO, better, MVS. And frankly, a slightly better version of the 2022 MVS would be a god-sent for this offense. If that's ALL he is, it's still a hell of an add to the WR room.

Depends on the price, but I'm not super interested. He's a one-trick pony, and I want more versatility than that.

RunKC 01-04-2024 12:15 PM

Yeah Egbuka looks nice. I think Adonai Mitchell looks good too.

Lot of options. Feels like we wouldn't have to trade up with this class assuming they call declare.

This will probably never happen bc Andy almost always drafts a lineman in the first or 2nd rd, but man getting Egbuka or Mitchell and then Cade Stover in rd 2 would be so awesome

Couch-Potato 01-04-2024 12:37 PM

I also like Egbuka! But if we had Brown, a fast deep threat, and Rice, a scrappy over the middle type, I might consider going with a tall outside guy like Thomas Jr.

Dunerdr 01-04-2024 12:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 17318269)
I think I'm alone on the Gabe Davis bandwagon, but that's why I like him. I think he can outplay whatever deal he ends up signing. But I do see the concerns there in that he's not really an all-fields player. He's mostly a seam stretcher/deep guy. A younger and IMO, better, MVS. And frankly, a slightly better version of the 2022 MVS would be a god-sent for this offense. If that's ALL he is, it's still a hell of an add to the WR room.

I'd be fine with Davis paired with a strong outside WR in the draft or FA. It just cant be only Gabe Davis.

JPH83 01-04-2024 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 17318340)
I love Nick and have for a long time. I'm a well-known Mizzou honk on here.

BUT... I still see a guy who is at best a "eh, he's OK" option as a pass defender. His instincts are next level and I think they play him up until he starts to decline physically.

But if he's fooled, or pulled out of position by his assignment, he just doesn't have the raw speed/range to recover quickly. And he's still pretty limited as a pass defender.

I just don't see how you can pay him big money on a long-term deal when that's the case.

Depends on what he's asking, but I assume it's going to be more than I'm comfortable with.



I like those DT names just fine. And Egbuka is a 6-1/200 guy and comes from a program that has done a good job developing guys who can win inside and out.



Depends on the price, but I'm not super interested. He's a one-trick pony, and I want more versatility than that.

Good point on the program. I maybe have some slight reservations about how effectively he really beats man and I wonder if he's as fast as some suggest, but yeah, I'd still love him late in the 1st. He'd be a helluva grab.

JPH83 01-04-2024 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 17318353)
Yeah Egbuka looks nice. I think Adonai Mitchell looks good too.

Lot of options. Feels like we wouldn't have to trade up with this class assuming they call declare.

This will probably never happen bc Andy almost always drafts a lineman in the first or 2nd rd, but man getting Egbuka or Mitchell and then Cade Stover in rd 2 would be so awesome

Loads of simulators I've grabbed 2 WRs the first 2 rounds and been really excited. But inevitably I'm then unsure on the LT situation and find myself with lots of holes.

Realistically I don't think we can fully "fix" the WR or LT in FA. I think maybe the best outcome is to partially fix the WR room with someone like Brown, and then replace Jones with an aggregate approach at DT. I'd consider ditching Reid as well and signing someone like Stone who's better at coverage and probably cheaper.

If we go into the draft with a cheaper and possible upgrade at safety and a group of DTs like Pierce and Daquan Jones replacing C Jones, I think we call those positions good until later picks.

Then you can focus on WR and LT. I think a stud WR in R1 is possible. Move up early in the 2nd to grab the best remaining LT, maybe someone like Patrick Paul, and then spend the rest of the draft on a TE, a guard who can sit a year, coverage focused LB, RB and maybe a double dip at WR. If the draft ticks a couple of those boxes I think we can maybe fix one or 2 more through remaining FA.

DJ's left nut 01-04-2024 03:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dunerdr (Post 17318425)
I'd be fine with Davis paired with a strong outside WR in the draft or FA. It just cant be only Gabe Davis.

Oh no question.

I mean I'm looking at him as a possible THIRD entry to the WR room. Sign Brown, Draft Egbuka, sign Davis, keep Rice - that's your top 4. I really don't care about WR5 and 6. If that's Watson and Moore, so be it. Maybe Ross pushes one of 'em off the roster.

raybec 4 01-04-2024 05:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 17318663)
Oh no question.

I mean I'm looking at him as a possible THIRD entry to the WR room. Sign Brown, Draft Egbuka, sign Davis, keep Rice - that's your top 4. I really don't care about WR5 and 6. If that's Watson and Moore, so be it. Maybe Ross pushes one of 'em off the roster.

If Ross can hang around well enough to push someone out next year that would be ideal.

DJ's left nut 01-04-2024 05:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by raybec 4 (Post 17318859)
If Ross can hang around well enough to push someone out next year that would be ideal.

I still don't see any 'there' there.

But that one guy assures me he has 'game speed' and would've housed the ball that Rice didn't. So there's that.

ToxSocks 01-04-2024 05:34 PM

Firmly against signing Tranquill over Gay. I can already tell this is going to be an offseason topic of contention.

Bowser 01-04-2024 06:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 17318894)
Firmly against signing Tranquill over Gay. I can already tell this is going to be an offseason topic of contention.

I agree, but if Gay prices himself out of our range, then Tranquill is a must re-sign. The defense didn't skip a beat with Tranquill in there for either Gay or Bolton.

Hell, Tranquill may have well priced himself out of our range now that I think of it.

kccrow 01-04-2024 09:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 17318963)
I agree, but if Gay prices himself out of our range, then Tranquill is a must re-sign. The defense didn't skip a beat with Tranquill in there for either Gay or Bolton.

Hell, Tranquill may have well priced himself out of our range now that I think of it.

I think that's where Tranquill has more value than Gay.

DJ's left nut 01-04-2024 10:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 17318963)
I agree, but if Gay prices himself out of our range, then Tranquill is a must re-sign. The defense didn't skip a beat with Tranquill in there for either Gay or Bolton.

Hell, Tranquill may have well priced himself out of our range now that I think of it.

He had a fantastic year last season with the Chargers - he hasn't shown anything this year that he didn't last.

Not sure why the market didn't materialize for him but I'm not sure why it suddenly would now.

JPH83 01-05-2024 01:18 AM

I'd take Tranquil over Gay. Gay's just too wildly inconsistent for me to care about the athletic potential at this stage. I think Tranquil has been fairly up and down too, but less so.

duncan_idaho 01-05-2024 09:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 17318894)
Firmly against signing Tranquill over Gay. I can already tell this is going to be an offseason topic of contention.

I expect Gay to get a little more cash and interest.

I love Gay and would LOVE to roll with Tranquill/Gay as the core LB for the forseeable future, but it just doesn't seem likely.

O.city 01-05-2024 09:30 AM

I'd rather keep Gay, but I'd keep Tranquill and Gay and let Bolton walk.

raybec 4 01-05-2024 10:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 17318867)
I still don't see any 'there' there.

But that one guy assures me he has 'game speed' and would've housed the ball that Rice didn't. So there's that.

I know there was a lot of excitement when he signed as a UDFA but I just don't think he's ever going to take that next step to be a better option than Watson. I hope I'm wrong.

RunKC 01-05-2024 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 17319311)
I'd rather keep Gay, but I'd keep Tranquill and Gay and let Bolton walk.

Lot of people, including me, are gonna be unhappy when they open the checkbook for Bolton this off-season.

I've already accepted it

raybec 4 01-05-2024 01:25 PM

I kind of hope they throw down a little scratch and keep Mike Danna

Buehler445 01-05-2024 01:57 PM

I think if the money is the same I keep Bolton and let Gay walk.

If Tranquil remains cheap there is value there.

Hopefully there is some wizardry that we can do to keep all 3, but that's probably not going to happen. Hopefully Chenal is ready to break fools.

Bowser 01-05-2024 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buehler445 (Post 17319775)
I think if the money is the same I keep Bolton and let Gay walk.

If Tranquil remains cheap there is value there.

Hopefully there is some wizardry that we can do to keep all 3, but that's probably not going to happen. Hopefully Chenal is ready to break fools.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/X5GthM254Ok?si=GIDF8tVv1lcIZE-u" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen></iframe>

A little Leo hype for you

poolboy 01-05-2024 02:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buehler445 (Post 17319775)
I think if the money is the same I keep Bolton and let Gay walk.

If Tranquil remains cheap there is value there.

Hopefully there is some wizardry that we can do to keep all 3, but that's probably not going to happen. Hopefully Chenal is ready to break fools.

yeah, its probably not possible but I would love to run back this same LB crew....
They seem to have something special going

DJ's left nut 01-05-2024 04:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buehler445 (Post 17319775)
I think if the money is the same I keep Bolton and let Gay walk.

If Tranquil remains cheap there is value there.

Hopefully there is some wizardry that we can do to keep all 3, but that's probably not going to happen. Hopefully Chenal is ready to break fools.

I keep waiting for a light bulb to come on for Gay and for him to turn into some all-world monster.

Because the flashes he shows are things that maybe literally NOBODY in the NFL can do. I mean he's a truly unique physical talent.

But he's just always been kinda dumb.

But what gets slept on with him is the energy level. I don't care about that all that much for offensive players, but on defense I want SOMEONE who plays with his hair on fire. It was always, IMO, what prevented DJ from being the annual All-Pro his physical skills said he could be. He was just so cerebral, for good and bad. He was always thinking his way through plays.

And sometimes you kinda want someone that's just looking to hurt someone out there. That's looking to fly into an area and make a play. That's able to make a mistake and 2 plays later have a giant shit-eating grin on his face and slapping his teammates on the ass for something they did.

That guy is pretty important to the defensive psyche, IMO.

So while the question will naturally be Gay or Tranquil - they just bring such different things that I don't think that's the right question. I think it's Tranquil or Bolton. And with Gay, it's just a question of money. Keep Tranquil or don't - it's immaterial to the Gay decision, IMO.

If you can afford to retain him, you do it. If you can't - well damn. But whether Tranquil is here or he isn't, I don't think that calculus changes substantially apart from the cap space we have available to us. And I think you DEFINITELY close the door on Gay before you use that cap space on Tranquil.

Nightfyre 01-05-2024 07:20 PM

Can someone please help me understand the Marquise Brown love? In five NFL seasons, he has been healthy for two, barely cracked a thousand yards once. I get that he can make some big plays, but is <1 big play per game average really worth 4/70? Especially when MVS has a similar number of big plays in fewer receptions each year?

I guess I just struggle to get enthusiastic about Brown, and I don't really see where everyone's hype comes from.

duncan_idaho 01-05-2024 07:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nightfyre (Post 17320108)
Can someone please help me understand the Marquise Brown love? In five NFL seasons, he has been healthy for two, barely cracked a thousand yards once. I get that he can make some big plays, but is <1 big play per game average really worth 4/70? Especially when MVS has a similar number of big plays in fewer receptions each year?

I guess I just struggle to get enthusiastic about Brown, and I don't really see where everyone's hype comes from.

1. He missed 3 games in 3 years in Baltimore. Out of like 54 total. So, he was a generally healthy player until he was shipped to play home games on the garbage field in Arizona.

2. He's not just a big-play guy and not a Valdes-Scantling replacement. They wouldn't be paying him to just run deep routes and be a deep threat. They'd be bringing him in to use him like they used Hill (and planned to use Toney this year).

3. The hype comes from him being a generally productive player when healthy, who can beat guys deep, make guys miss in the open field, and who catches the ball really well. His career drop rate is like 4%, which is really good. And for a little guy, he's surprisingly good in contested catch spots.

4. Of the guys likely to ACTUALLY hit FA (Mike Evans, Calvin Ridley being the other 2 in his tier), he's the youngest and offers the most opportunity to provide more value than the contract he signed.

All things equal, if it were me, I'd go hard after Mike Evans and try to make that happen, if possible. But I think the Chiefs are more likely to covet/target/get Brown.

Basically, if you like Zay Flowers and would like to have Zay Flowers on the Chiefs, you should be interested in Brown.

Couch-Potato 01-08-2024 08:57 AM

Really like those first two picks.

Guyton feels like an Andy Reid type. Very athletic pass blocker with good feet, needs to be coached up. Egbuka is exactly what Andy looks for, he's a route runner and separator. Brown feels like exactly what we need, a fast deep threat that can catch.

O.city 01-08-2024 09:11 AM

I don't actually disagree on the Brown thing, I'm just not up for paying him that. There's just not much upside cooked in there. If he hits his ceiling, maybe. But how likely is that?

O.city 01-09-2024 01:14 PM

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">final pass rush metrics for interior defenders <a href="https://t.co/MvDru7eNvn">pic.twitter.com/MvDru7eNvn</a></p>&mdash; Timo Riske (@PFF_Moo) <a href="https://twitter.com/PFF_Moo/status/1744782336967762249?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 9, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Nightfyre 01-10-2024 12:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 17326229)
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">final pass rush metrics for interior defenders <a href="https://t.co/MvDru7eNvn">pic.twitter.com/MvDru7eNvn</a></p>&mdash; Timo Riske (@PFF_Moo) <a href="https://twitter.com/PFF_Moo/status/1744782336967762249?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 9, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Given the subjective characteristics of PFF's evaluation, does aggregating this stuff (I won't even call it data) mean anything? Like if Aaron Donald's evaluator has even a little bias, it would just be amplified in the aggregation, for example. Unless there are strictly objective criteria or some measure of control over such "metrics" (which again, I think is objectively a stretch of the capability of the PFF evaluation system) isn't this chart worth as much as any given eye test?

Couch-Potato 01-10-2024 11:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nightfyre (Post 17326326)
Given the subjective characteristics of PFF's evaluation, does aggregating this stuff (I won't even call it data) mean anything? Like if Aaron Donald's evaluator has even a little bias, it would just be amplified in the aggregation, for example. Unless there are strictly objective criteria or some measure of control over such "metrics" (which again, I think is objectively a stretch of the capability of the PFF evaluation system) isn't this chart worth as much as any given eye test?

Lots of penalties are objective as well, but we accept that.

I'm a PFF fan, but understand most aren't.

Couch-Potato 01-10-2024 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 17326229)
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">final pass rush metrics for interior defenders <a href="https://t.co/MvDru7eNvn">pic.twitter.com/MvDru7eNvn</a></p>&mdash; Timo Riske (@PFF_Moo) <a href="https://twitter.com/PFF_Moo/status/1744782336967762249?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 9, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Jones and Sneed are both must keeps, regardless of what CP thinks, it can be done.

We have $31m in space already + let MVS walk for +$14m = $45m = $28m Jones & $17m Sneed.... restructure someone (Mahomes, Thuney, or Taylor) to pay the smaller contracts.

DJ's left nut 01-10-2024 11:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Couch-Potato (Post 17326766)
Jones and Sneed are both must keeps, regardless of what CP thinks, it can be done.

We have $31m in space already + let MVS walk for +$14m = $45m = $28m Jones & $17m Sneed.... restructure someone (Mahomes, Thuney, or Taylor) to pay the smaller contracts.

How do you intend to address the WR room?

You can't 'run it back' with this team. And if you retain Sneed and Jones, that's what you're committing to.

A) 'Run it back' rarely works
B) This ain't a good enough squad to do that with anyway.

It needs a fairly significant roster shakeup and bringing back both Sneed and Jones will prevent that.

O.city 01-10-2024 11:43 AM

Draft a guy, flip a pick to the Titans for Hopkins.

I don't think they can bring back Jones at that #, but he's still an elite player and that's gonna sting losing him.

kccrow 01-10-2024 12:10 PM

Jones recent comment about this maybe being his last game at Arrowhead kind of puts some writing on the wall. I don't think he's back, and at his number we probably shouldn't. He's a great player, no doubt, but sinking 28+ into a DT is tough to do.

Nightfyre 01-10-2024 12:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Couch-Potato (Post 17326763)
Lots of penalties are objective as well, but we accept that.

I'm a PFF fan, but understand most aren't.

I think PFF got crushed at the outset quite rightfully. But my understanding is that they have diligently worked to improve their product. I don't know any of the specifics but was kind of hoping to foster a conversation with the folks who might keep up on that stuff to lazily get an update.

Nightfyre 01-10-2024 12:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kccrow (Post 17326882)
Jones recent comment about this maybe being his last game at Arrowhead kind of puts some writing on the wall. I don't think he's back, and at his number we probably shouldn't. He's a great player, no doubt, but sinking 28+ into a DT is tough to do.

I think when you step back to the big picture there is a lot of merit to investing draft capital at interior pass rusher, EDGE, WR, OL, and CB and filling the roster through free agency around that. (assuming you have solved for QB). Like bang for buck wise. Such a strategy should enable you to have a much deeper roster just given the premium teams are paying for the positions you focus on drafting.

O.city 01-10-2024 12:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nightfyre (Post 17326914)
I think when you step back to the big picture there is a lot of merit to investing draft capital at interior pass rusher, EDGE, WR, OL, and CB and filling the roster through free agency around that. (assuming you have solved for QB). Like bang for buck wise. Such a strategy should enable you to have a much deeper roster just given the premium teams are paying for the positions you focus on drafting.

It's great in theory, but it just requires you to hit on a really high number of draft picks. It's just tough.

JPH83 01-10-2024 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 17326841)
How do you intend to address the WR room?

You can't 'run it back' with this team. And if you retain Sneed and Jones, that's what you're committing to.

A) 'Run it back' rarely works
B) This ain't a good enough squad to do that with anyway.

It needs a fairly significant roster shakeup and bringing back both Sneed and Jones will prevent that.

Meant to upvote, fat fingers, sorry

DJ's left nut 01-10-2024 01:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JPH83 (Post 17327043)
Meant to upvote, fat fingers, sorry

Dick!

Couch-Potato 01-10-2024 01:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 17326841)
How do you intend to address the WR room?

You can't 'run it back' with this team. And if you retain Sneed and Jones, that's what you're committing to.

A) 'Run it back' rarely works
B) This ain't a good enough squad to do that with anyway.

It needs a fairly significant roster shakeup and bringing back both Sneed and Jones will prevent that.

Like O.City says, if you keep Jones and Sneed you can afford to draft a WR RD 1 or flip a pick for a guy like Hopkins. TEN might be more willing to do so now that Vrabel is out. If you go with a RD 1 WR maybe you find some money for a small contract for a guy like Renfrow to be your #3. Likewise, if you can get a guy like Hopkins you can go OT in RD 1 and wait until the mid-rounds for a #3 WR.

Also restructuring doesn't have to be catastrophic for the future of our cap. For instance, if you convert $10m of Mahomes Salary to Signing Bonus then that $10m is now spread from 2024 season at $10m, to the next 5 seasons at $2m each, and if the cap is going up by say $20m a year then you're good. The impact becomes less and less each season as long as you don't abuse it too much.

Couch-Potato 01-10-2024 01:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Couch-Potato (Post 17327069)
Like O.City says, if you keep Jones and Sneed you can afford to draft a WR RD 1 or flip a pick for a guy like Hopkins. TEN might be more willing to do so now that Vrabel is out. If you go with a RD 1 WR maybe you find some money for a small contract for a guy like Renfrow to be your #3. Likewise, if you can get a guy like Hopkins you can go OT in RD 1 and wait until the mid-rounds for a #3 WR.

Also restructuring doesn't have to be catastrophic for the future of our cap. For instance, if you convert $10m of Mahomes Salary to Signing Bonus then that $10m is now spread from 2024 season at $10m, to the next 5 seasons at $2m each, and if the cap is going up by say $20m a year then you're good. The impact becomes less and less each season as long as you don't abuse it too much.

I'd add that this might be the right strategy with J. Taylor. He's leading the league in penalties and not impressing anyone. We're locked into a sizable contract with him until at least next offseason. If he's absolutely terrible in the playoffs maybe you decide to cut your loss but need cap space to replace him, so maybe you restructure and bench or cut him, and bring in someone else with that cap space and pay the dead cap price for Taylor's restructure over the next 5 years. Not ideal, but something you might do to reduce the impact of a potentially poor decision.

Couch-Potato 01-10-2024 02:03 PM

Pete Caroll out for SEA... Maybe Lockett gets let go to save cap space. They're pressed up against the cap with only $1.5m and he's due for a new contract.

kccrow 01-10-2024 05:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nightfyre (Post 17326914)
I think when you step back to the big picture there is a lot of merit to investing draft capital at interior pass rusher, EDGE, WR, OL, and CB and filling the roster through free agency around that. (assuming you have solved for QB). Like bang for buck wise. Such a strategy should enable you to have a much deeper roster just given the premium teams are paying for the positions you focus on drafting.

I agree largely. I don't know if I care too much about investing large amounts of capital in DT but ER, WR, OT, and CB I am 100% on board with. Keep em churning and developing. DT, RB, LB, S and IOL are relatively cheap in FA comparatively even if they are really good players. You only really pay high dollar for exceptional as those positions.

Chris Meck 01-10-2024 10:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 17326927)
It's great in theory, but it just requires you to hit on a really high number of draft picks. It's just tough.

Hey, guess what?

If you don't hit on a high number of draft picks, you're ****ed in the NFL.

you can't just spend your way to multiple championships in the NFL. You can MAYBE buy one. Ask The Rams.

You can spend what SHOULD have bought you a Super Bowl and still not get there, ask The Cowboys.

To have sustained success, you damned well better draft well.

Chris Meck 01-10-2024 10:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kccrow (Post 17327399)
I agree largely. I don't know if I care too much about investing large amounts of capital in DT but ER, WR, OT, and CB I am 100% on board with. Keep em churning and developing. DT, RB, LB, S and IOL are relatively cheap in FA comparatively even if they are really good players. You only really pay high dollar for exceptional as those positions.

Yeah.

Two or three good players at those positions for what ONE at a premium position costs. Better be hitting on those in the draft.

O.city 01-11-2024 08:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Meck (Post 17327774)
Hey, guess what?

If you don't hit on a high number of draft picks, you're ****ed in the NFL.

you can't just spend your way to multiple championships in the NFL. You can MAYBE buy one. Ask The Rams.

You can spend what SHOULD have bought you a Super Bowl and still not get there, ask The Cowboys.

To have sustained success, you damned well better draft well.

There's a reason no one has kept drafting their way to it either.

The odds are, you're eventually gonna draft some shit birds.

JPH83 01-12-2024 01:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 17327064)
Dick!

Upvoted your insult to make amends!

JPH83 01-12-2024 01:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kccrow (Post 17327399)
I agree largely. I don't know if I care too much about investing large amounts of capital in DT but ER, WR, OT, and CB I am 100% on board with. Keep em churning and developing. DT, RB, LB, S and IOL are relatively cheap in FA comparatively even if they are really good players. You only really pay high dollar for exceptional as those positions.

It's why I'd move on from Justin Reid and feel pretty casual about letting someone like Gay walk. If you stumble upon elite players at those positions fine, maybe you try and keep them. Otherwise keep churning and developing. Cam Jones looked like he could be a very reliable run-stuffing LB in that Chargers game as an example

OKchiefs 01-12-2024 09:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by raybec 4 (Post 17319722)
I kind of hope they throw down a little scratch and keep Mike Danna

So their 1st rd pick can ride the bench another year?

raybec 4 01-12-2024 10:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OKchiefs (Post 17329410)
So their 1st rd pick can ride the bench another year?

If their 1st round pick can't beat him out then yes. The best players should play, no one should have their path cleared for them because they aren't able to win a job.

O.city 01-12-2024 11:23 AM

They drafted him in the first, he's gonna play. They can't sign Danna and let the best man win, they need that money elsewhere.

OKchiefs 01-12-2024 11:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by raybec 4 (Post 17329431)
If their 1st round pick can't beat him out then yes. The best players should play, no one should have their path cleared for them because they aren't able to win a job.

That's not clearing the path for him, you still probably draft a DE in the mid-rounds and/or sign a cheap veteran for depth. But you're talking spending $10+ million a year to re-sign someone when you have a 1st round pick who was likely drafted with the idea of replacing Danna and taking away valuable cap room from other positions. It's simply not an efficient use of money.

Hoover 01-12-2024 12:35 PM

Dana is going to get a bigger Bag of $$$ than Gay will because he plays at a premium position. He's gone and we are going to get a nice comp pick down the road because we are going to loose players like him and Jones.

Keep the secondary together, try to hold on to those LBs because they won't break the bank, keep investing in the Defensive Line in the draft.

RunKC 01-12-2024 12:41 PM

Felix and Thompson will be DE 3 and 4. They showed good flashes last week. Just need the off-season to get stronger and work on technique. Talent is definitely there.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">This rep from BJ Thompson makes me GIDDY <a href="https://t.co/aqxRSWiyeg">pic.twitter.com/aqxRSWiyeg</a></p>&mdash; Daniel Harms�� (@InHarmsWay19) <a href="https://twitter.com/InHarmsWay19/status/1745190211452047807?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 10, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">BJ Thompson is lightning in a bottle. Doesn&#39;t close out the win, but tuck this rep in your back pocket for future use <a href="https://t.co/k6eXuu4G4F">pic.twitter.com/k6eXuu4G4F</a></p>&mdash; Daniel Harms�� (@InHarmsWay19) <a href="https://twitter.com/InHarmsWay19/status/1744801938456146010?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 9, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Felix Anudike-Uzomah showing off some power in his extension, taking Slater to the QB and nearly getting his hand on the pass <a href="https://t.co/o9szwAeOH8">pic.twitter.com/o9szwAeOH8</a></p>&mdash; Daniel Harms�� (@InHarmsWay19) <a href="https://twitter.com/InHarmsWay19/status/1744819531845878177?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 9, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

DJ's left nut 01-12-2024 12:50 PM

Told y'all that Thompson had tools you can't teach.

He's overaged so the projection curve on him is tough to establish. But man, even if you also need to use next year to coach him up, he could be a hell of a little piece for a couple seasons. That get-off and the bend is borderline elite.

kccrow 01-12-2024 12:51 PM

nah, let Danna walk. Keep churning young guys through the ladder. We have 4 ends in Karlaftis, Omenihu, FAU, and Thompson plus we can ERFA tender Herring, which they will. Maybe spend another 4th or 5th on a DE or something. No need to lock up a bunch of money in Danna. If you can get him on a 1-year for like 3 million, that's one thing.

duncan_idaho 01-13-2024 01:08 PM

Yeah, Harring showed some promising things in that Chargers game. 1st time for me, really.

He’ll be ERFAed in 2.0.

Couch-Potato 01-14-2024 12:28 PM

Dang, Thompson has some odd stances before the snap lol

Glad he and FAU showed some potential, looking forward to them putting it all together.

JPH83 01-14-2024 02:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 17329787)
Told y'all that Thompson had tools you can't teach.

He's overaged so the projection curve on him is tough to establish. But man, even if you also need to use next year to coach him up, he could be a hell of a little piece for a couple seasons. That get-off and the bend is borderline elite.

The age is the problem. I'd be interested to know how many guys come on strong at that age, it's gotta be few and far between, right?

JPH83 01-14-2024 02:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 17331090)
Yeah, Harring showed some promising things in that Chargers game. 1st time for me, really.

He’ll be ERFAed in 2.0.

Zero juice as a pass-rusher but against the run he's looked pretty damn solid, and he looks a guy you can move around a bit. I'd definitely keep him.

O.city 01-15-2024 08:11 AM

I don't like that FAU was inactive in a playoff game.

duncan_idaho 01-15-2024 09:19 AM

Probably will knock 2.0 out today.

Re: Anudike-Uzomah, I don't care that he was inactive. What he does or doesn't do this year is really inconsequential.

O.city 01-15-2024 09:29 AM

Drafting a guy in the first round, then fully redshirting him....I dunno. Unless it's a QB, I don't think it's wise.

Dunerdr 01-15-2024 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 17338335)
I don't like that FAU was inactive in a playoff game.

I think it was more about getting run stuffers on the active roster than FAU off. If mostert and Achane get going it could have been a different ball game. Really glad Pennel was called up.

The dolphins RB's were getting destroyed in the back field. I was at the game and dont have the brain power to fully take in a game in persone when its -28 wind chill, but it seemed like the Dline was doing its job against the run very well.

O.city 01-15-2024 11:32 AM

That's true.

duncan_idaho 01-15-2024 12:03 PM

Version 2.0 bump!

Dunerdr 01-15-2024 01:54 PM

I do not care for the part where you said we may be picking lower... other than that I could live with it.

duncan_idaho 01-15-2024 03:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dunerdr (Post 17338955)
I do not care for the part where you said we may be picking lower... other than that I could live with it.

Oh. I mean, picking later. Lower in the first round. I think of 1 as high and 32 as low.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:38 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.