ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs And so the "Matt Cassel to KC" Rumors Begin... (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=201588)

FloridaMan88 02-02-2009 09:59 AM

And so the "Matt Cassel to KC" Rumors Begin...
 
As if they hadn't started already...

http://www.bostonherald.com/sports/f...&position=also


Matt Cassel draws interest


TAMPA - They might not have been one of the two Super Bowl participants last night, but the Patriots [team stats] still generated a lot of talk on Radio Row during the week.

With Matt Cassel making the rounds, there was plenty of speculation on how much interest he would draw should the Pats apply the franchise tag and then trade him.

The pundits’ top pick to land Cassel in that scenario is Kansas City. Obviously, the Scott Pioli factor weighs heavily in that choice, with the Pats former vice president of player personnel now calling the shots for the Chiefs.

“I’d really look at Pioli down there in Kansas City. Why wouldn’t he want him?” Sirius NFL radio analyst Jim Miller said. “He knows what the kid is capable of doing. So I think he’d be on their radar.”

Miller, like most analysts, doesn’t see the crop of quarterbacks in this year’s NFL Draft as particularly appealing. That boosts the draw for Cassel, especially if Pioli decides he’s not satisfied with the collection of QBs he inherited after taking over the job.

“I don’t think this is a strong quarterback draft. Everybody is saying Matthew Stafford of Georgia and Mark Sanchez of USC are going to go in the Top 10. I don’t believe that,” Miller said. “I don’t think those guys are ready. And I don’t think you’ll see the type of success guys like Matt Ryan or Joe Flacco had. They just haven’t played enough. So I can’t see teams wanting them.

“But if Kansas (City) were to make that deal, that’s their Matt Ryan. That’s their Joe Flacco. Unlike a Sanchez, for instance, they know he’s playing at a starter’s level. So to them, I think it’d be worth it to do. They’d get their starting quarterback, they know what he’s capable of doing, and they’ve seen him win games at the NFL level.”

Other experts, meanwhile, aren’t sure Pioli would want to deal with his former boss right out of the gate.

Some other teams figuring to make a pitch for Cassel include the New York Jets, Detroit, Minnesota, San Francisco, Carolina, Tampa Bay and Chicago.

As for what Cassel would land in a trade, there were differing opinions. Miller, for one, thought he would cost a second-round draft choice.

The decision to trade or keep Cassel will ultimately depend on Tom Brady [stats]’s health. While reports have him on target to play in the season opener, he still has a few hurdles to clear before that point following reconstructive surgery on his left knee and a subsequent staph infection.

“I think a lot is going to depend on where Kevin O’Connell is in his development. If they feel they can move Matt to benefit their team, they’ll do it,” said Miller, a one-time Pats backup quarterback. “It’s rolling the dice on Tom and whether he’s healthy, and two, can they do it with Kevin O’Connell? The question they have to ask is if O’Connell is as capable of what they have in Matt Cassel?”

Garcia Bronco 02-02-2009 10:00 AM

If it helps I ran into his brother at the GAP yesterday.

EyePod 02-02-2009 10:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Garcia Bronco (Post 5450447)
If it helps I ran into his brother at the GAP yesterday.

I did too! He told me that Matt bought a house in KC....

Brock 02-02-2009 10:03 AM

I'd take him for the right compensation, I guess.

DaWolf 02-02-2009 10:03 AM

Well if we're not sold on either Stafford or Sanchez that high, if NE would go for the 2nd rounder it may not be such a bad move. I'm not really sure on Cassel, he may be this year's Derek Anderson, but if Pioli and the next HC believe he can run the offense they want to employ well, then you use the #3 on defense or on the OL, or trade down, and then trade the 2nd rounder for your QB...

OnTheWarpath15 02-02-2009 10:04 AM

We should trade our #1 for Cassel, then trade our 2nd round pick for Derek Anderson.

CupidStunt 02-02-2009 10:08 AM

I trust Pioli. I'm not certain this guy can win a championship, but I'm less certain Sanchez and Stafford can.

$75 million for Sanchez and a second-round unknown, or Cassell and Orakpo/whoever?

EyePod 02-02-2009 10:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5450458)
We should trade our #1 for Cassel, then trade our 2nd round pick for Derek Anderson.

lol. Let's trade all our picks for QB's. One of them has to be good. Maybe our 3rd for John Beck or Vick? Who else can we get with our picks? *SIGH*

And by the way, I really wish that QB from Utah wasn't so freaking short. He would be a perfect NFL QB. He's listed at 6'1", but I've seen 6'. He has such a good work ethic and understands how to use tape to get better.... GROW 3 INCHES BRYAN!

Bill Lundberg 02-02-2009 10:15 AM

What if we swap first round picks with NE for Cassel? Would that be too much or too little?

DaKCMan AP 02-02-2009 10:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCChiefsfan88 (Post 5450444)
“I’d really look at Pioli down there in Kansas City. Why wouldn’t he want him?” Sirius NFL radio analyst Jim Miller said. “He knows what the kid is capable of doing. So I think he’d be on their radar.”

He also knows what the kid is NOT capable of doing. So I think he'd not be on their radar.

See how easy it is to speculate?

EyePod 02-02-2009 10:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bill Lundberg (Post 5450487)
What if we swap first round picks with NE for Cassel? Would that be too much or too little?

This would be OK. I like to get a 3rd or a 4th in the deal too though. I just keep remember what our last NE backup QB was capable of, and I get scared...

The Franchise 02-02-2009 10:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bill Lundberg (Post 5450487)
What if we swap first round picks with NE for Cassel? Would that be too much or too little?

That would basically make Cassell worth a mid 1st round pick. So yeah....that's too much to give up for him.

philfree 02-02-2009 10:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bill Lundberg (Post 5450487)
What if we swap first round picks with NE for Cassel? Would that be too much or too little?

We still have seven picks and we gain our starting QB:hmmm: We'd be in a good position to draft someone like Duke Robinson and a pass rusher like M. Johnson. Considering the talent at the top of this draft is iffy I think I could deal with it.

PhilFree:arrow:

BigCatDaddy 02-02-2009 10:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pestilenceaf23 (Post 5450502)
That would basically make Cassell worth a mid 1st round pick. So yeah....that's too much to give up for him.

I don't see why NE would want to move up to pay a buttload of money for any player at the top of this years draft. They would probably rather take the 2.

DeezNutz 02-02-2009 10:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5450458)
We should trade our #1 for Cassel, then trade our 2nd round pick for Derek Anderson.

Great point.

We should also consider sending NE our 3rd rounder for Pioli. Just because.

OnTheWarpath15 02-02-2009 10:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 5450526)
Great point.

We should also consider sending NE our 3rd rounder for Pioli. Just because.

He's gotta be worth at least our 3rd AND 4th.

Reerun_KC 02-02-2009 10:37 AM

I cant wait until we draft a QB at the 3 spot...

It will be priceless to watch all the Carl/Marty clones meltdown, because they just are sold on a 1st round QB, when we should of taken a RT...

This is going to be the best offseason ever!

PhillyChiefFan 02-02-2009 10:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5450458)
We should trade our #1 for Cassel, then trade our 2nd round pick for Derek Anderson.

Get off the computer Herm. You're drunk again. :D

The Franchise 02-02-2009 10:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5450533)
He's gotta be worth at least our 3rd AND 4th.

Sweet and then with our 5th round pick we should grab Chase Daniel and with our 6th we should take Chase Patton and then in the 7th.....we can grab Cullen Harper.

GREATEST DRAFT EVAR!!!1!111!!!!1

PhillyChiefFan 02-02-2009 10:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pestilenceaf23 (Post 5450547)
Sweet and then with our 5th round pick we should grab Chase Daniel and with our 6th we should take Chase Patton and then in the 7th.....we can grab Cullen Harper.

GREATEST DRAFT EVAR!!!1!111!!!!1

No Rhett Bohmar??

The Franchise 02-02-2009 10:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PhillyChiefFan (Post 5450550)
No Rhett Bohmar??

We've already traded our 3rd and 4th round picks for Scott Pioli.

PhillyChiefFan 02-02-2009 10:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pestilenceaf23 (Post 5450559)
We've already traded our 3rd and 4th round picks for Scott Pioli.

Ah my mistake.

3rd and 4th? Man we are good people. Pats need all the help they can get.

DeezNutz 02-02-2009 10:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5450533)
He's gotta be worth at least our 3rd AND 4th.

The next time we trade a pick for someone who is not a player, whether he be a HC or a water boy, you're going to see me on the evening news.

PhillyChiefFan 02-02-2009 10:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 5450569)
The next time we trade a pick for someone who is not a player, whether he be a HC or a water boy, you're going to see me on the evening news.

Shotgun in tow?

OnTheWarpath15 02-02-2009 10:44 AM

The only thing missing from this thread is random picture time.

I'll start:

http://www.finkbuilt.com/static/imag...es/monkey1.jpg

Molitoth 02-02-2009 10:46 AM

Quote:

“But if Kansas (City) were to make that deal, that’s their Matt Ryan. That’s their Joe Flacco. Unlike a Sanchez, for instance, they know he’s playing at a starter’s level. So to them, I think it’d be worth it to do. They’d get their starting quarterback, they know what he’s capable of doing, and they’ve seen him win games at the NFL level.”



YES!

Monty 02-02-2009 10:55 AM

I don't want Cassel at all. Not because I don't believe that he's a decent QB, but his former OC is the HC at Denver now. If anyone would know his tendencies, weaknesses, it's Josh.

Next.

Micjones 02-02-2009 10:59 AM

I'd gladly take Cassel for the right price.

Frankie 02-02-2009 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bill Lundberg (Post 5450487)
What if we swap first round picks with NE for Cassel? Would that be too much or too little?

I'd do that if they would also take LJ out of our hands for a 3rd or a conditional 4th.

Cassel + NE1 + NE3 <-------> LJ + KC1

keg in kc 02-02-2009 11:16 AM

I can't imagine the Chiefs making any deals with New England. There'd be too much of a risk of "nepotism" complaints, conflict-of-interest.

King_Chief_Fan 02-02-2009 11:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 5450716)
I can't imagine the Chiefs making any deals with New England. There'd be too much of a risk of "nepotism" complaints, conflict-of-interest.

not to mention the possibility that Cassel is this years Derek Anderson, falls on his buttocks in KC and Pioli's career in KC starts off with a thud.

CupidStunt 02-02-2009 11:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 5450716)
I can't imagine the Chiefs making any deals with New England. There'd be too much of a risk of "nepotism" complaints, conflict-of-interest.

From who?

Because Pioli sure as hell won't care what us fans think.

dj56dt58 02-02-2009 11:30 AM

somebody tell this dumbass that nobody thought Ryan/Flacco were gonna do what they did either

Bowser 02-02-2009 11:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5450458)
We should trade our #1 for Cassel, then trade our 2nd round pick for Derek Anderson.

Proctor just sprung wood.

Frankie 02-02-2009 12:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 5450716)
I can't imagine the Chiefs making any deals with New England. There'd be too much of a risk of "nepotism" complaints, conflict-of-interest.

Nah. Business is business.

rambleonthruthefog 02-02-2009 12:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Micjones (Post 5450648)
I'd gladly take Cassel for the right price.

i can live with him for a 3rd or a 4th pick. a 2nd seems a bit high, but if pioli wants him for our 2nd pick i'll bite my toungue.

Mr. Flopnuts 02-02-2009 12:08 PM

I don't want anything to do with him if we need to pay him $15 million dollars for next year. Let the Pats keep that salary.

Mr. Laz 02-02-2009 12:08 PM

no thanks

OnTheWarpath15 02-02-2009 12:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts (Post 5450874)
I don't want anything to do with him if we need to pay him $15 million dollars for next year. Let the Pats keep that salary.

Yep.

SOMEONE is going to be forced to pay him a shit-ton of money, I hope it's not us.

BigCatDaddy 02-02-2009 12:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts (Post 5450874)
I don't want anything to do with him if we need to pay him $15 million dollars for next year. Let the Pats keep that salary.

As usual in situations like this new deal is worked out before the trade is made. This what we did when we traded for Surtain.

R&GHomer 02-02-2009 12:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Garcia Bronco (Post 5450447)
If it helps I ran into his brother at the GAP yesterday.

:) No more out of you chuckles.

Consistent1 02-02-2009 12:19 PM

It is really hard to judge what Cassel is worth. He could end up being pretty darn good, or just about average. It is too bad that he did not get put on the spot in a playoff situation. He helped the team go 11-5, what could he have done with the added pressure? It is good and bad for him. On one hand, he did not get the chance to flop. On the other, if he had a good playoff run....he would be in line for a big payday and the Pats would have easily gotten a few nice trade offers. Was what he did during the season a fluke, did the team situation do it all for him, was it Welker and Moss? Who knows right now....

aturnis 02-02-2009 12:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dj56dt58 (Post 5450757)
somebody tell this dumbass that nobody thought Ryan/Flacco were gonna do what they did either

Neither of those QB's did anything outstanding. They managed games well enough for their good teams to win. If either was in K.C., they wouldn't have even been considered good.

Matt Ryan 16 TD's 11 Int's 16 games started

Joe Flacco 14 TD's 12 Int's 16 games started

Tyler Thigpen 18 TD's 12Int's 11 games started

Nothing outstanding. Would I be glad to have them? Yes. I would also be glad to have a lot of the players on their offenses.

wazimo 02-02-2009 12:28 PM

Cassell
 
If the Patriots would accept a 3rd rounder I would jump on it. I think they will more likely ask for a 1st and accept a 2nd.

It's a little far fetched but I would love to p/up Haynesworth in Free agency then draft Oher or Curry in the first, trade the 2nd for Boldin, and our 3rd for Cassell. We still have a ton of young players on our roster. This would make us much better on both offense and defense. Do we have enough money?

Mr. Laz 02-02-2009 12:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Garcia Bronco (Post 5450447)
If it helps I ran into his brother at the GAP yesterday.

why aren't you banned anyway?

ChiefRon 02-02-2009 12:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCChiefsfan88 (Post 5450444)
“But if Kansas (City) were to make that deal, that’s their Matt Ryan. That’s their Joe Flacco. Unlike a Sanchez, for instance, they know he’s playing at a starter’s level. So to them, I think it’d be worth it to do. They’d get their starting quarterback, they know what he’s capable of doing, and they’ve seen him win games at the NFL level.”

I agree with Jim Miller on this, but I actually hope it doesn't happen and we draft Sanchez or Stafford just so I can laugh at all the stupid posts on ChiefsPlanet.

DaFace 02-02-2009 12:52 PM

I must've missed something. I thought that Cassell was UFA this season. What's with all the talk of draft picks? I know they may franchise him, but doesn't that come with a requirement that teams signing him give up a first round pick or something like that?

SAUTO 02-02-2009 12:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaFace (Post 5451134)
I must've missed something. I thought that Cassell was UFA this season. What's with all the talk of draft picks? I know they may franchise him, but doesn't that come with a requirement that teams signing him give up a first round pick or something like that?

franchise=2 1st rounders, but they can still trade him for whatever

Mr. Flopnuts 02-02-2009 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaFace (Post 5451134)
I must've missed something. I thought that Cassell was UFA this season. What's with all the talk of draft picks? I know they may franchise him, but doesn't that come with a requirement that teams signing him give up a first round pick or something like that?

They franchise him and a team signs him they're obligated to 2 first round selections. I can't imagine Cassell saying yeah, I'll pass up $15 million for 1 year to get $30 million for 4. Which is about all he's worth at this point IMO.

As far as I'm concerned, the Pats ****ed themselves when they went this route.

ChiefRon 02-02-2009 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaFace (Post 5451134)
I must've missed something. I thought that Cassell was UFA this season. What's with all the talk of draft picks? I know they may franchise him, but doesn't that come with a requirement that teams signing him give up a first round pick or something like that?

If they franchise him and another team signs him to an offer sheet, the Pats can decide whether to match the offer or not. If they decide to not match, they get the compensation from the other team, depending on the level of the tender offer.

Most likely, the team would negotiate compensation first to avoid having the pay the compensation related to the tender offer.

Mr. Flopnuts 02-02-2009 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefRon (Post 5451146)
If they franchise him and another team signs him to an offer sheet, the Pats can decide whether to match the offer or not. If they decide to not match, they get the compensation from the other team, depending on the level of the tender offer.

Most likely, the team would negotiate compensation first to avoid having the pay the compensation related to the tender offer.

I think you're thinking of restricted free agency. If a team signs a franchise player without working out a deal with his team, they are required to give up 2 first round draft picks.

ChiefRon 02-02-2009 01:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts (Post 5451174)
I think you're thinking of restricted free agency. If a team signs a franchise player without working out a deal with his team, they are required to give up 2 first round draft picks.

Yes, you are right, that's restricted FA.

But bottom line is the same: if a team was going to make a play for him, they would negotiate the compensation first to make sure it would make sense and it can be for less than 2 1st round picks.

nychief 02-02-2009 01:08 PM

I don't know about Cassel yet... I mean I think we have to bring in a Vet and a Rookie QB this offseason, but am not sold on Cassel. We bring in Cassel and he is the guy.

EyePod 02-02-2009 01:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefRon (Post 5451190)
Yes, you are right, that's restricted FA.

But bottom line is the same: if a team was going to make a play for him, they would negotiate the compensation first to make sure it would make sense and it can be for less than 2 1st round picks.

Yeah, didn't we do this with JA?

Brock 02-02-2009 01:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EyePod (Post 5451204)
Yeah, didn't we do this with JA?

Yep

Mr. Laz 02-02-2009 01:17 PM

if you trade for cassel then you're stuck because he will demand a long term, starter money contract


better be sure

KCKY-Fan4life 02-02-2009 01:26 PM

2nd Rounder for White Cassel
 
I say we try and use our 2nd rounder for Cassel, its basically a low 1st round pick. THen we take Crabtree with our #3 pick. We are going to need to fill TOny G's void when he leaves in a few years. How awesome would it be to have 2 WR studs, like Bowe and Crabtree. It would be KC's best WR duo ever.

EyePod 02-02-2009 01:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 5451240)
if you trade for cassel then you're stuck because he will demand a long term, starter money contract


better be sure

We aren't, and I don't think Pioli is either. *CROSSES FINGERS*

Sully 02-02-2009 01:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCKY-Fan4life (Post 5451284)
I say we try and use our 2nd rounder for Cassel, its basically a low 1st round pick. THen we take Crabtree with our #3 pick. We are going to need to fill TOny G's void when he leaves in a few years. How awesome would it be to have 2 WR studs, like Bowe and Crabtree. It would be KC's best WR duo ever.

No.

Frankie 02-02-2009 01:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 5450999)
why aren't you banned anyway?

Good question. Shanahan's son was wondering about the same thing.

Frankie 02-02-2009 01:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 5451137)
franchise=2 1st rounders, but they can still trade him for whatever

If they franchise him and there are no takers, they are stuck with two expensive QBs.

Frankie 02-02-2009 01:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCKY-Fan4life (Post 5451284)
I say we try and use our 2nd rounder for Cassel, its basically a low 1st round pick. THen we take Crabtree with our #3 pick. We are going to need to fill TOny G's void when he leaves in a few years. How awesome would it be to have 2 WR studs, like Bowe and Crabtree. It would be KC's best WR duo ever.

High 2 is too much to pay for Cassel.

'Hamas' Jenkins 02-02-2009 01:39 PM

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ekQ_Ja02gTY&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ekQ_Ja02gTY&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

OnTheWarpath15 02-02-2009 02:02 PM

Piss on Matt Cassel.








No, seriously.

http://www.nydailynews.com/gossip/ga...her/index.html

New England Patriots quarterback Matt Cassel doesn’t like golden showers.

The football star was in line for the bathroom at ESPN’s Tampa Bay Super Bowl bash Friday night when a drunken reveler tried to cut in front of him. “Matt told him to wait his turn and headed into the urinals,” a spy tells us. Moments later, the fella barged in and proceeded to purposefully pee directly on Cassel’s leg. After security tossed the drunk, Cassel headed back out into the crowd, wet pants and all

Titty Meat 02-02-2009 02:21 PM

Why's everyone aginst bringing in Cassell?

DaKCMan AP 02-02-2009 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 5451474)
Why's everyone aginst bringing in Cassell?

Because we want a franchise QB, not a college and NFL backup.

Frankie 02-02-2009 02:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 5451474)
Why's everyone aginst bringing in Cassell?

I'm not. But I don't want us to pay more than a third for him. I actually want us to sign his unfranchised ass outright.

Frankie 02-02-2009 02:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP (Post 5451483)
Because we want a franchise QB, not a college and NFL backup.

Last year he was an NFL starter.

RustShack 02-02-2009 02:28 PM

I'll take a 20 year old over a 26 year old. Especially when the younger QB has more experience, isn't the product of surrounding talent, has all the physical tools, and a lot more upside.

Titty Meat 02-02-2009 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP (Post 5451483)
Because we want a franchise QB, not a college and NFL backup.

Yea an NFL backup that won 11 games his first year as a starter and threw 21 Td's? You'd rather draft an unproven QB who'll be drafted high by default?

Fritz88 02-02-2009 02:31 PM

Boston pundits trying to shove Cassel down our throats.

RustShack 02-02-2009 02:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 5451502)
Yea an NFL backup that won 11 games his first year as a starter and threw 21 Td's? You'd rather draft an unproven QB who'll be drafted high by default?

That same team won 18 games last year, the only major difference was at QB.

OnTheWarpath15 02-02-2009 02:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 5451502)
Yea an NFL backup that won 11 games his first year as a starter and threw 21 Td's? You'd rather draft an unproven QB who'll be drafted high by default?

An NFL backup that stepped into the most prolific offense in the league.

Which also seems to be a common occurrence at EVERY position for the Patriots. Guys get hurt, a nobody steps in and does the job.

Being successful in NE doesn't mean success elsewhere.

Titty Meat 02-02-2009 02:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 5451507)
That same team won 18 games last year, the only major difference was at QB.

Really? So the injuries to all their starting Rbs, Rodney Harrison, Adulais Thomas, Ect. Had nothing to do with that? Of course Cassell isn't as good as Tom Brady but neither are most Qb's in the NFL.

DaKCMan AP 02-02-2009 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frankie (Post 5451488)
Last year he was an NFL starter.

So were Tyler Thigpen and Dan Orslovsky. Your point?

Archie Bunker 02-02-2009 02:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 5451474)
Why's everyone aginst bringing in Cassell?

Since quite a few of these CP QB gurus were anti-Ryan pro-Croyle this time last year, I wouldn't put much stock into it.

RustShack 02-02-2009 02:35 PM

Its easy to put up passing yards when all your doing is passing to Moss and Welker. Your probably someone who thinks Moss didn't make Cullpepper too right?

Basileus777 02-02-2009 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP (Post 5451516)
So were Tyler Thigpen and Dan Orslovsky. Your point?

That's a bullshit comparison and you know it. Cassel is an NFL starter. Is he a franchise QB? Probably not.

DaKCMan AP 02-02-2009 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 5451502)
Yea an NFL backup that won 11 games his first year as a starter and threw 21 Td's? You'd rather draft an unproven QB who'll be drafted high by default?

Yeah, ignore the fact that he was QBing a team that went 16-0 the previous year and has outstanding WRs. 21TDs? With the team and WRs he had that's an unimpressive number.

RustShack 02-02-2009 02:37 PM

You probably also think Bowe didn't make Russell in college either huh?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:09 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.