ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Schefter: **New NFL Playoff Structure - 1 BYE, 7 Teams per Conference** (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=329422)

pugsnotdrugs19 02-19-2020 09:38 PM

At the same time, I think we’re going to see an uptick in teams that sit starters for the final week. More spots means more teams will be locked into the tournament, and I think that’s going to lead to more of those scenarios where coaches elect to prioritize rest over seeding — especially since there’s only one bye to earn.

jerryaldini 02-19-2020 10:04 PM

Optics are bad with owners doing a money grab while talking out of the other side of their mouth about player safety. So tired of sports being diluted by monetary incentives.

comochiefsfan 02-19-2020 10:12 PM

Schefter on ESPN shilling for the league, like everybody wants this shit.

GTFOH

Chiefspants 02-19-2020 10:15 PM

I see Roger hung out at his friend Rob’s house this week.

Chiefspants 02-19-2020 10:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MAHOMO 4 LIFE! (Post 14803832)
Who gives a **** tbh. We got Mahomes

Absolutely this.

The CBA changes would be pitch-perfect for the Chiefs to have a dynasty capable team. Jones, Watkins and about improved IOL and LB core is a team dominant enough to almost even out the odds with an added game in the playoffs.

Would there be a record Mahomes wouldn’t obliterate under this format?

I hate the playoff changes, btw - but with Mahomes who even cares.

KC_Connection 02-19-2020 10:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 14803995)
Dude.

Are you paying attention?

This new CBA is almost tailor made for our upcoming dynasty.

Huge expanded cap
Separate QB cap that limits the impact of QB salary
Only the top team gets a bye

Be excited about this stuff.

Adding games and further randomizing the playoffs is not good for any Chiefs dynasty (and that's exactly what this move does). Wasn't speaking on the rest of the CBA.

BossChief 02-19-2020 10:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Connection (Post 14804362)
Adding games and further randomizing the playoffs is not good for any Chiefs dynasty (and that's exactly what this move does). Wasn't speaking on the rest of the CBA.

Teams are going to have to come to a rested Arrowhead every year with Andy having 2 weeks to prepare for them.

Dynasty time, baby.

pugsnotdrugs19 02-19-2020 10:34 PM

Teams could still very easily lock themselves into the 2 seed before the final game and then they are just going to make it their own bye week by resting starters. So I think that aspect of it is going to level out somewhat many times.

RunKC 02-19-2020 10:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 14804369)
Teams are going to have to come to a rested Arrowhead every year with Andy having 2 weeks to prepare for them.

Dynasty time, baby.

That’s not a guarantee by any means and this year proves that. We were lucky.

Lucky the Dolphins beat the Patriots. Lucky that Pat was not placed on IR after his knee was turned sideways.

Injuries happen all the time and a lot of that is pure luck. Last year we were lucky. This year it was the Ravens who didn’t have any major injuries.

Playing another game is another opportunity for more injuries. If the players are smart, they’ll demand a 2nd bye week be added to the regular season.

These players bodies go through a ton and more players are retiring early. Adding more games does nothing for the good of the league except put money in owners pockets.

TEX 02-19-2020 10:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by comochiefsfan (Post 14804351)
Schefter on ESPN shilling for the league, like everybody wants this shit.

GTFOH


Yep. Dumb. 7 teams making the playoffs is too many. It cheapens it IMO.

pugsnotdrugs19 02-19-2020 10:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 14804394)
That’s not a guarantee by any means and this year proves that. We were lucky.

Lucky the Dolphins beat the Patriots. Lucky that Pat was not placed on IR after his knee was turned sideways.

Injuries happen all the time and a lot of that is pure luck. Last year we were lucky. This year it was the Ravens who didn’t have any major injuries.

Playing another game is another opportunity for more injuries. If the players are smart, they’ll demand a 2nd bye week be added to the regular season.

These players bodies go through a ton and more players are retiring early. Adding more games does nothing for the good of the league except put money in owners pockets.

This is a two-sided coin IMHO.

We can say we were lucky that Miami won, that Pat’s injury wasn’t worse... but I can just as easily say that other teams were lucky he (and our other stars) were hurt and missed games to begin with. Those injuries to star players directly correlated to 3 of our losses.

I could also say we were unlucky to deal with all of that, including Mahomes missing 2 games. Most teams still didn’t have the injury misfortune the Chiefs had — we were just fortunate enough to have our guys when it mattered most (outside of Jones and his freak calf injury—bad luck).

RunKC 02-19-2020 10:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 14804397)
This is a two-sided coin IMHO.

We can say we were lucky that Miami won, that Pat’s injury wasn’t worse... but I can just as easily say that other teams were lucky he (and our other stars) were hurt and missed games to begin with. Those injuries to star players directly correlated to 3 of our losses.

I could also say we were unlucky to deal with all of that, including Mahomes missing 2 games. Most teams still didn’t have the injury misfortune the Chiefs had — we were just fortunate enough to have our guys when it mattered most (outside of Jones and his freak calf injury—bad luck).

That’s what sucks about this. We don’t get injured like we were then we are the top seed.

I hate it that only one team gets a bye. It’s too big of an advantage and one seed is usually due to luck.

You’re placing the 2 seed in the same boat as a 7 seed. A 14-3 team could be playing 3 games like a 9-7 team in this system.

Hate hate hate it. The format was damn near perfect and they ****ed it up.

KC_Connection 02-19-2020 11:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 14804369)
Teams are going to have to come to a rested Arrowhead every year with Andy having 2 weeks to prepare for them.

Dynasty time, baby.

The chances of getting a #1 seed every year are a lot less likely than getting a top 2 seed every year. There's no question that this change hurts the top teams like the Chiefs/Ravens and is better for the mediocre ones.

TEX 02-19-2020 11:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 14804407)
That’s what sucks about this. We don’t get injured like we were then we are the top seed.

I hate it that only one team gets a bye. It’s too big of an advantage and one seed is usually due to luck.

You’re placing the 2 seed in the same boat as a 7 seed. A 14-3 team could be playing 3 games like a 9-7 team in this system.

Hate hate hate it. The format was damn near perfect and they ****ed it up.

Yeo. For the love of $$$.

PurpleRiders51 02-19-2020 11:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dj56dt58 (Post 14803647)
To give just one team that big of an advantage over the rest is just stupid. Football is the only major sport with a playoff bye to begin with. Baseball has a Wildcard game to get into the playoffs but that is completely different. You don't see NBA or MLB teams getting the first round of the playoff off just because they have the 1 seed. I don't have a problem with the NFL having first round byes but for just 1 team to get it is a garbage idea

One team in both the NFC & AFC, or just one team total from both?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:04 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.