![]() |
Quote:
I had some people I went to school with who knew people that worked for the Chiefs in different capacities that we spent a lot of time with, some of the stories they would tell were pretty crazy. I basically take it as pure entertainment and enjoy the guys who are generally good dudes, how ever many they are. |
Quote:
Prove that he hasn't paid. Posted via Mobile Device |
Quote:
If he owes any back pay it would be a court filing for that also. Where is it? Posted via Mobile Device |
Quote:
Publications like the WaPo and Star have Standards of Proof, as do All Good journalists. Do you seriously think that both publications left out pertinent info to slant their reporting? |
I'd think her actions and such go to show that he hasn't been paying, no?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Posted via Mobile Device |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Posted via Mobile Device |
Quote:
But an honest question would be... "why is she having to go to the courts for child support at all" You may well be right, and this is all speculation about things lawyers have already figured out... but Blabbs article seemed to point to money not being received in due time There is some grey area of the exact facts here, but you seem needlessly defensive IMO... if the kid is behind on payments, we can all agree he better get right asap |
Quote:
the courts do this because they do not want to be stuck paying welfare payments when there is documented proof the childs father (in this case) is or will be a millionaire. |
Quote:
It's a legally binding contract to ensure both parties do/get what they're supposed to get. It's financially responsible for her to go through the court instead of just going by his word and promise to give her money. Posted via Mobile Device |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Just saying that if a judge has already decided on $1300 as the proper amount, and thats not being paid on time... then its a legit bitch Too many here are taking a different angle than "just the facts, ma'am", theres too much emotion going on IMO |
what i find silly about this debate. it's not like this woman is his wife and she is staying with him. she left him. did what she was supposed to do in these situations. it's unfortunate that hill is on camera because i can guarantee you we all work with or know someone who has done similar things, and we are friends with them. we just don't know about it.
ETA: i don't think i have stated, i think his actions could have and should have at the time warranted jail time. but it was up to the legal system where he was to determine that. for me, he has nothing to do but support his kid, present or not. Not show any signs of aggression in his private life towards anyone, and fulfill his court ordered instructions (and that includes 18 years of paying child support). again.. if in three years we are hearing a recurring theme, then obviously he is failing not only himself but everyone else. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:50 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.