Where'd you see that at?

As far as I am aware, they haven't played a down yet this season and we're already giving pro bowl nods?

Ragland has missed like 3 days of camp. Reid has said he could play if they needed him for a regular season game, they're just not because why bother with a swollen knee when it's training camp?

He has no other significant injury history to speak of. Just a freak ACL tear. That goes for him and like half the ****ing league.

At this point, we're not being haunted by shit. He's fine.

He should have made the pro bowl last year and everything I've seen so far is Fuller is sticking to these fast as hell receivers like glue.

That's an issue inherent in Sutton's defense. Which is why it's a shame Peters didn't work out.

You need corners who can play man, and play the ball when it's in the air. Otherwise you're going to get killed on the blitz

Surely you remember what happened to every corner opposite Peters, right? It was downright embarrassing.

The lack of cover corners is what forced the 3-man rush. They were getting murdered on the back end so they added more bodies, at the sacrifice of a pass rush.

I don't know about everything. I remember watching Fuller trip over his own feet on a downfield pass to (Watkins?).

Didn't he have some injury issues in college? And a knee swelling while sitting on his ass during a plane ride? That's cause for concern for sure.

IDC what Reid says. He was pretty confident about Houston too, and it took him more than half a season to return. Remember that?

I don't care what QB it is or what CB it is...if a QB has all day to sit back and wait, the WR's will come open. Pass rush is where it all starts. A good pass rush makes average CB's better. A suck pass rush makes great CB's look like shit.

People who think Dorsey was/is bad. Just watch Cleveland. I am telling you.

But are you gonna say he inherited a great team? Lol

Veach looks like a good one too but still has a lot to prove.

And a corner who gets beat like a drum before the pass rush can get there makes the pass rush look like shit. The end result is the same.

You need both. If you're going to play the scheme Sutton wants, you have to have both. Otherwise one aspect of your D gets sacrificed.

DOOMED

Thinking about going to camp for a day or two next week. Anything anyone can tell me about the visit? How kid friendly is the experience for a couple of girls? Is there any type of post practice social activity? Good bars or restaurants etc?

Any replies are appreciated

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

When Veach brought in Buttkicker I stopped questioning. That guy is freakin NAILS.

Are you talking about Reid's decision to keep playing Houston the rest of 2015 and into the playoffs when he first sustained the injury? The decision to have surgery didn't occur until a couple months into the 2016 offseason, and at that point, there wasn't a single person (including Reid) who was saying, "Recovery from this surgery is a breeze. Houston won't miss any time at all!"

And if it's the 2015 thing you're talking about, I'd say these are pretty different situations. Houston's was an error by team doctors who said he didn't need surgery; Ragland's is simply something that occasionally happens to guys with ligament damage. It's pretty common for guys who have undergone ligament damage to have swelling from flights.

https://www.arrowheadpride.com/2018/...t-does-it-mean

Is there a 100% chance this Ragland thing won't be a big deal? No, of course not. But given the guy started 10 games last year after enduring the tear the year before, and given he flew MANY times during the course of that season and still did well, would you really say we're being "haunted" by this injury?

Let's see where he's at in Preseason Week 3. If he's being held out of that game, THEN we have a problem.

This entire conversation has been about the defense. The whole time. Even when I said Dorsey inherited a lot of talent.

And no, I’m not going to consider KPass as a greatly inherited talent until he proves it. Same goes for any other rookie.

It's about the defense because it's a convenient argument that you narrowed in on.

The real conversation is about whether or not Dorsey was a good GM.

Focusing on the unit that was destined for a rebuild regardless of who the GM was is convenient for you, but not encompassing of the job he did.