It will be pretty easy to tell if they have any interest. If we see a restructure happen then it's happening.
|
If Veach can re sign Clark, extend Jones and sign Nuke Billag will give Veach a BJ with no hands
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
It's always funny to me how beaten down the average Chiefs fan is from years ago.....looks at twitter...most other teams fans "this mofo is goin to the Chiefs isn't he, ****"
Chiefs fan "The Chiefs won't sign him, there's no way he's old anyway" |
Quote:
|
If we sign him he's an amazing WR
If we don't sign him he's an old broke dick we didn't want anyway. Win Win!! |
Quote:
JFC you're a weirdo. |
Quote:
|
Regardless of how much talent and athletic ability Toney has... this team does not have a clear #1 WR. Mahomes made it work with a 1/2 guy in Ju-Ju last season who despite having Mahomes as his QB only caught 3 TD and under 1k yards.
Gotta be realistic. We cannot ask Kelce, who turns 34 this year, to be the #1 receiver again. As of right now, this team's aspirations for another Super Bowl lie 100% in keeping Mahomes and Kelce healthy. If Kelce goes down for any reason what so ever... we are basically hinging our entire season on Rice being a day 1 god. There is zero depth at WR. Not a single receiver on this roster has clocked a 1k season since their college years. In fact, only 3 receivers on this squad even got 1k yards in college. Ross (1k yards exactly, 2018 - Clemson), Ross (1,150 yards, 2016 - Clemson), Rice (1,355 yards, 2022 - SMU) D-Hop to KC on a 1 year deal pretty much HAS to happen unless Veach did his draft king thing and scored a day 1 WR1 in Rice. |
Quote:
I think he has a point. I mean, it's pretty much what GB did to Rodgers. Not the contract part, but every year GB refused to draft a WR in the first round. Every year they chose to give him a little bit less offensively. And it obviously got to a point where Rodgers didn't want to discuss the draft at all. And also obviously it created a rift between Aaron and the GB FO that was irreparable after awhile. Mahomes took a very team-friendly deal because Veach/Clark told him that they would continue to keep the roster filled with weapons every year. It could make Pat question that promise, if year after year, the FO does not pull the trigger in cases like this, or in the draft of course. Now, nothing like that would happen this season, but if it happened again next season, or basically became a kind of trend . . . I could see any QB begin to lose confidence in his FO after a few seasons like that, just saying. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I have no problem with people downvoting me, but if you're going to constantly do it without having anything to actually say, I'm going to eventually call you out. |
In a perfect world yeah this is the move to make.
With 30 other teams in the mix this is not happening unless he really wants to sacrifice money for a ring. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I mean, i know how i'd react to that. |
It's like people forgot that he's played 19 games in the last 2 seasons, including a suspension for PEDs.
The Chiefs are more than capable of winning a Super Bowl without him. Let some other desperate team overpay for him. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Cap dudes, so how much are the Cardinals gonna be paying him to not be on their team?
|
Quote:
They are intentionally eating it now because they are creating the room to dump Kyler Murray next year. |
Quote:
Yeah, and I'm not absolving Rodgers either. it's not like he made things easy for the FO up to that point either. But saying that to your future first ballot HOF SB-winning QB, and the face of your team for over a dozen years to that point, in a public forum . . . that was the year I told my GB buddy that Aaron should just ask to be traded. I know I would've said some impolite things to my boss after that, just saying. |
Quote:
If he's collecting that from the Cards, he may not care nearly as much about what he's taxing his next team. That money is coming in regardless. |
Kelce and DHop are two of the best chain movers to ever play the game. Our 3rd down conversion % would be downright absurd.
Toney's celing is ridiculously high. I dont think ppl understand how good he can be. MVS and Mahomes are sure to have better chemistry this year and hit on more of those downfield throws. I think that offense could shatter records. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
This fact may make money even less of an issue for Dhop regarding his new team. |
Quote:
Hell, ARI might be in full tank mode. Try to get Caleb in 2024? Weird though. |
Quote:
Adding DeAndre Hopkins would increase the rostered WRs on the team. Who and where do you cut? Adding DeAndre Hopkins is going to reduce the playing time for other WRs including MVS. Where can you get the most Cap space by a trade from the WRs? According to overthecap.com, the Chiefs could get a $9M cap saving by trading MVS post June 1. I really don't know if a team would trade for MVS though and pay the $9M for the season. I like MVS and think he adds value to the Chiefs. I would love to add DeAndre Hopkins to the Chiefs WR group. I really don't think that the Chiefs will trade MVS, but if they should sign Hopkins and younger WRs develop, it might be possible. |
I am trying to add a reason why Veach wouldn't. I don't know much about Hopkins. Is he a dick/cancer? That would be "A" reason.
Sure he puts up good numbers, but that 6 game suspension for performance enhancing drugs would be a red flag for me. Also, the Cardinals willing to take a $22.6 million dead cap hit is also unnerving. |
Quote:
Before Hopkins: Toney, MVS, Moore, Rice, James and Watson. After Hopkins: Hopkins, Toney, MVS, Moore, Rice and James. |
He'll be 31 at the start of the season. We have next to nothing in the piggy bank. Even if he came here on the cheap chasing a ring or trying for a long-term contract, how much would he be worth NEXT year and the following years? We also have 12 WRs on the roster today. Just for grins, let's see what those guys have to offer.
In short, thanks but no thanks. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">DHop on the Chiefs is going to hit different.</p>— Adam Rank (@adamrank) <a href="https://twitter.com/adamrank/status/1662165816677367813?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 26, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
|
Sign him to 2 real years and a void year for a third year and let’s max out the offense while we are still in the “Kelce prime window”
|
Why this ridiculous fascination with trading MVS? It's silly.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
We don’t need him, but if he wants to come here on a low one year incentive laden deal to set himself up for next year, sure. Why not?
No one is likely paying big money at this point. Most teams have spent their salary cap dollars. I get the feeling he wants to try and win (teams with ring potential; KC, Bills, etc.) this year but ultimately the goal is to go to an explosive offense where he can put up numbers and set himself up for a big final payday this next off-season. You almost have to think it will be Buffalo or KC at this point. It may come down to which team offers the ‘better’ incentive laden deal since neither team really has money to spend. |
Quote:
Obviously his value is hurting right now for some reason. Perhaps there's a deeper issue that we don't know (This would explain why he only went for apparent pennies from the Texans to the Cards too) but if he wants to regain some of that value, how he would do it would be a 1 year deal. He'd be the best WR of the 13 we'd have if he were here. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
If it's possible, then the Chiefs will do it. They will find a way. There is no way they don't see that as a move worth making regardless of cost.
But...who the **** knows. I for one hope like hell it happens... |
Quote:
|
One of the easiest options is bringing Chris Jones to the table and offering him a long-term extension that would lower his cap hit. They could create up to $16 million in salary cap space with that one move alone.
Another option would be for Chiefs’ salary-cap guru Brandt Tillis to create a contract with some void years on it to spread out Hopkins’ cap hit. This is a tactic often used by teams like the New Orleans Saints and Los Angeles Rams, but it runs the risk of hurting the team’s salary cap situation down the line. Ultimately, Kansas City does still have the means to acquire Hopkins. The big question remaining is whether or not their level of interest in the player has changed since the 2023 NFL draft. |
Quote:
Dude got paid $9m for 687 yards and 2 TDs in the regular season. |
ErieCountyBulls is back on the case, but he still has work to do!
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Just a reminder to my updates. I've deleted no tweets at any time and stood by every single thing I've heard. Sometimes people can be dialed in. For now, I still have more work to do</p>— ECB (@ErieCountyBulls) <a href="https://twitter.com/ErieCountyBulls/status/1662152551473594368?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 26, 2023</a></blockquote |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Chris Jones extension is the ace up Veach's sleeve for sure. Mahomes has taken less than market as the leader of the offense. Would love to see Chris Jones expedite this extension to allow the DHop deal to get done.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
However, if we acquired DHop, that vertical stretch becomes less necessary. And not because Deandre would take over part of that role, because imo that would be a huge waste of his skillset/talent. But with a WR like Hopkins, you just don't need to create that much room underneath, so MVS' value would decrease slightly when Hopkins was on the field. But overall, I'm on the side of trading MVS isn't a real option. |
Hopkins - Back for a full season
Toney - Healthy all year Moore - Takes a big step forward Rice - Proves he's a dog out there Tall-Ross - Returns to 1st round form Fast-Ross - Andy squeezes the most out of him James - Is a reliable pass catching option when called upon ^Optimal performance from this group could be pretty incredible! |
Quote:
1. This just shows how much of a dumpster fire Arizona is. They are taking the cap hit AND getting no picks for him. That's what bad franchises do. 2. KC can't afford a bidding war for his services. If he is chasing the biggest paycheck, KC won't land him. If he wants to play for the best QB ever along with having a very real shot at winning a ring, KC is his best place. Other teams are good, like Buffalo, but under McDermott and Allen they have still never made an AFCCG, while KC has hosted five in a row and has been to three SBs in five years, while winning two and being the defending SB Champion. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
https://www.yahoo.com/sports/details...201544218.html |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Hoping we can make it happen! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
6 Rec, 116 Yards, 1 TD We don't win the AFC Championship game without MVS stepping up the way he did. And that was partially due to him having to shift roles after injuries in the game. He HAD to be the guy and start filling JuJu's and Mecole's roles when they went down. And he was targeted more because he had to take on those roles, and he did well when he was asked to do it. During the regular season his role was much more purely as deep threat. 492 of those yards were gained when our field position was before midfield. They didn't rely on him much for short yardage, hence less TDs (only 29 yards gained when we were in the redzone). If you want to argue that he can't break the big bomb for the touchdown, sure I won't disagree. He is a deep threat that unfortunately tends to go down and can't break free, but acting like he isn't doing what Andy's scheming has him designed to do is intellectually dishonest. |
Quote:
But we need to replace him probably after this year |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Go look at the production of Allen Lazard (11mm), Russel Gage (8.5mm), and Adam Thielen (8.3mm), and tell me that MVS’s playing in a completely new system in year 1 with those stats is somehow a dramatic overpay. He played the role we had hoped he would as a deep threat. In the postseason he played the role of WR1 when he was called upon. Not sure what you expected from a vet making 9mm/yr but his production is in line. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Someone was nice enough to explain tis to me a couple years ago. scroll up to the top Click 'user CP' at the top left of screen scroll down to and click 'helpful answers' bottom left, under 'Misc.' |
I would be pissed if he chose the Bills. Don't overthink it D-Hop and make the logical choice. Guaranteed ring in the process.
|
Quote:
:) |
Quote:
DHop is a good receiver (when healthy). He has an ego. He considers himself to be amongst the best WR’s in the NFL. He was at one time, not so sure anymore. Point being he’s not signing up for some shitty WR2 contract at this point when he knows he can simply go out sign a one year deal, ball out (assuming he stays healthy), and land one last big payday to finish out his career. Now what offense could he sign with that would give him this type of potential? He’s already named his Top 5 QB’s he’d like to play with. Hurts: Philly not looking for a WR. Herbert: Williams, Allen and now Johnston who they drafted with their #1 pick? Not enough balls to go around in LA. Lamar: I suppose it could happen, but you never know what’s gonna happen with Baltimore’s offense. The more likely scenario is the final 2: Buffalo or KC. Both have elite QB’s, explosive offenses and have a need at WR. I think KC would like to have a veteran WR with some top end potential to add to the mix IF they can make the numbers work. And honestly, he would be a perfect fit in Buffalo as a #2 across from Diggs and them now adding Kincaid. I honestly think Buffalo is where he will end up, but we’ll see. He MAY get ‘paid well’, buts it’s definitely not gonna be this offseason. |
Quote:
Dude was 7th on drops with only 1 less than Kelce. Kelce was targeted 152 times. MVS 81. That is just the ones he "dropped" and not including the ones he gave up on. He is vastly overpaid for his production. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:40 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.