Quote:
|
Thank God that training camp is starting on Friday... this Dorsey story has gotten epically stale.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
So I suspect Clark's biggest issue outside of the communication stuff was that he wasn't seeing what he considered to be a great vision or plan moving forward regarding how the cap dollars were being managed. Obviously Veach brought this up as well so that must have been a huge point of emphasis in the interview. That along with Hunt stressing that Veach had a plan on how to build a "championship roster" in 2-3 years seemed to be emphasized, meaning that he probably was not seeing that from Dorsey, who he may have felt had "plateaued". He also curiously mentioned Jamaal Charles during his press conference, and add to that the statement that he wants to make sure that he is plugged in on any big roster move we make, makes me think that the Charles and Maclin things really bothered him in the way they were done, and while he may not have disagreed with not bringing Charles back, the way Charles was let go and the subsequent "revenge" signing of a franchise great in Denver didn't sit well with him, and he probably would have preferred that we at least approach the release of a guy like that with more personal tact. Granted, this is all me speculating, but even Veach brought it up in terms of talking about how he knows these guys and will go talk to these guys if they have to get cut. Anyway, my guess is that Clark went into the process with Veach as the favorite, having heard great things about him from Reid and seeing him firsthand. He probably wanted to take this chance to interview a wide range of people to build up his Rolodex in case this thing blows up in a couple of years, and to see if anyone else would blow his socks off. But at the end of the day he probably wanted to keep the same personnel philosophy and personnel, but increase his oversight and get the communication fixed, and wanted someone who could articulate a clear plan of how to navigate the next three years, when a lot of these core guys we have are in their prime. Thus Veach, He probably would have promoted Ballard had he still been here, but again with the timing of things, it really sounds like once Ballard left, some of the problems really came to the surface... |
Quote:
|
http://www.chiefs.com/news/article-2...7-66d1baa3272e
For Hunt, who had known of Veach before this process as “somebody who loved football and loved watching tape, and somebody who’d had a big impact on our drafts the last couple of years,” the process of ultimately landing on his in-house candidate wasn’t without doing his due-diligence. “We evaluated more than a dozen candidates and interviewed some outstanding personnel executives,” Hunt explained. “After going through the process, it was clear that Veach was the right person for the job. I am confident that he will do an outstanding job of leading our personnel department. He has a sharp football mind, a tremendous work ethic, and a keen eye for finding talent.” Veach, who was going through the interview process for a general manager position for the first time in his career, also did his due-diligence in making sure he was prepared for whenever that time did come. He said he got some advice from an old co-worker and a guy who also recently went through a similar process. “Actually, Chris Ballard,” Veach explained of who helped him prepare for his interview. “He reached out and we talked a while. He’s great. He sent me a bunch of information. It was funny because last summer, going into the 2016 season, I was in the office and Chris would always tell me, ‘Just work on your portfolio, Brett. You’re gonna get a shot, and you never know when it’s going to happen.’ “So, when this all went down, Chris called me and said, ‘Hey listen, I know you already worked on that portfolio, but here’s some more stuff, and when you get that opportunity, this will help when you meet in front of Mr. Hunt.’ “Chris was awesome.” Within three hours of being announced as the Chiefs’ new general manager, Veach said he had heard from every scout in the Chiefs’ personnel department. “They were excited,” Veach explained. “Again, we’ve worked together for four years and keeping this thing going was big for all of us. They were genuinely excited, and I’m equally as excited to continue to work with them.” |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I also think that after the whole Haley/Pioli thing, Clark is very sensitive to make sure he has a coach and GM who will definitely get along. He mentioned that he thought a number of the candidates would work well with Reid, but he knows for sure that this one will... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
It's clear as day. |
Quote:
Reid just steps all over his own dick trying to answer that one, re-watch it...These two need to gets their lies straight... |
Quote:
|
You know what always makes my day, when someone gets fired and proceeds to get no credit for any of the good things but is blamed for every bad thing that happened. It's hilarious but it always happens.
|
Quote:
I honestly don't think we'll miss a beat. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Reid is fully in charge now and Veach is his player personnel assistant now. Veach is used to doing what Reid tells him to do from his Philly days. Reid and Veach are a package deal now if Veach gets fired so should Reid. |
Quote:
|
Everybody just chillax. We ALL know that things go really, really well when Andy Reid is given full run of a football franchise!
|
Quote:
4 straight NFC Championship appearances, a Super Bowl appearance and a Franchise QB, along with excellent defensive players and running backs. Boo hoo. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Reid took over personnel in 2001. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Heckert has killed it with the Broncos. :facepalm: Actually, he's lucky he didn't kill anyone driving drunk. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Fletcher Cox Vinnie Curry Nick Foles Bryce Brown Wanna try again, you ****ing poser? |
Quote:
What the ****? Do you mean Jim Johnson, butthole? Stop posting, Moron |
Quote:
Reid was hired first then brought Dorsey on board...when it was time to sign an extension, he wanted someone else. There was power struggle going on...and Andy didn't like how he handled personnel decisions. Hunt had no clue.. The crap about Dorsey being unorganized is BS. They had to invent a reason other than Reid didn't want to work with him anymore... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
It it the lack of oxygen? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
You don't have an arguement so you just say stupid shit instead. I doubt you've even been to a Broncos game. |
The Broncos haven't drafted a pro bowler or all pro since Tom Heckert has been employed in Denver.
In fact, they've drafted horrible busts like Montee Ball, Cody latimer, Michael Schofield, Jeff Huerman, Ty Sambrailo and Sylvester Williams with him. He sucks |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I dont buy what was leaked to the press...you do. That's where we differ. Andy forced him out....the rest is dog-n-pony fluff. |
Quote:
I should send a text to Heckert, so he can convince you to stop drinking. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
"My new contract and you're out the door, I have the power." ~signed Andy~ |
Quote:
There has been literally ZERO corroboration from local and national reporter. |
Quote:
Try harder next time |
Quote:
JFC. |
:D
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I honestly don't get where Reid "fired" Dorsey. All the info we've hears suggested that this was Hunt's show and that he was the one who pulled the trigger. Of course he probably discussed this with Reid, but I just can't see Hunt ceding such power to anyone...especially after the Pioli fiasco.
Plus, I think Hunt showed some real balls in releasing a guy BEFORE the shit really hit the fan. Usually such "releasing" only takes place after a disaster has happened. So, in my mind, Clark showed some real leadership. And this is coming from a guy (me) who really, really liked Dorsey. |
Quote:
Why would he lie? He said he had no say in the matter which is total horseshit. They wanted it to appear that canning Dorsey was solely a Chunt decision... and downplay Andy's involvement/influence. You only lie when you dont want something known...there is no other motive. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
(He's a great QB in battered chief's fan's world.) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Epic dipshiterry. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Andy fumbles through some reply that makes no sense....and doesn't answer the question. |
Quote:
I think this was all on Hunt (albeit with discussions with many. |
Quote:
They hired a newbie, internal GM who owes his entire career to Reid. |
Quote:
I'm sure people are turning it down right and left |
Quote:
You sound pretty certain that Reid is calling the shots. Do you have any hard evidence of this, or is it conjecture on your part? And I have no problem with conjecture...hey, this is an Internet forum for goodness sakes! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Our current GM speaks to the situation as well. A brand new GM who has worked for Reid almost his entire career. I doubt any established GM was willing to interview for the job considering that it was really a Player Personnel job that was opened. Maybe the reason Ballard left was that he knew that all the power belonged to Hunt and Reid and he wanted to have a full General Manager's position.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
That's what you sound like |
So let me get this straight- not one national or local guy dialed into the Chiefs ever reported that Reid was responsible for Dorsey's removal. Not one. If that had a shred of truth, Paylor, Breer, Mellinger, Cole would have reported it.
Andy Reid had his worst seasons when he was in charge of personnel. He's a smart guy. Why would he want to add that to his plate? Makes no sense. I also love how Bronco fans bring up Reid's defenses without Johnson in Philly weren't good. You're right, they weren't. His defenses with Sutton here have been very good, so I'm not sure why the **** this matters anymore. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
As far as Veach goes, he'll never truly be Reid's peer because Hunt is ceding more and more control of the franchise over to Reid. Normally the head coach would be responsible to the GM and the GM responsible for all aspects of football to the owner. But with the coaching staff out of his control he's not really a full GM, not as much of a GM as others around the league are, at any rate. Perhaps any General Manager position is an attractive job, but being a full GM instead of a junior one would certainly be preferable, and working for an owner that doesn't replace GMs every 3 or 4 years would be desirable too. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:30 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.