So with that distinction and the fact that he received a standing ovation, do you now understand the point that he was preaching to the choir?

The context of what he said was that a recent antisemitism bill would enable law enforcement to arrest people for claiming Jews killed the Christ character. This is blatant misinformation. Why would Butker mislead impressionable students? Was he confused or misled?

Ok pal you sure pinned me down with the facts there.

Standing ovation doesn’t mean there was unanimous agreement. I’m sure you’ve read or listened to reactions from women in the audience who weren’t thrilled with the message.

There’s two separate threads in DC for people to whine and complain about his religious/political beliefs, but a couple of these pansies just want to keep crying about it over here.

This thread is to talk about the best kicker in the NFL, the best kicker in Chiefs history, and the all time Super Bowl record holder for most FG’s and longest FG. If people can’t appreciate Butker, then they go fist the kicker who shall remain nameless’s old dirty bunghole.

All I'm saying his expressed views were not typical catholic views and not even the views of the nuns at the institution where he was speaking.

Yes. Butker misunderstood the bill just like a huge number of others did. I won't give him a free pass for it but that's quite a bit different than accusing someone of antisemitism.

Make no mistake though, I'll call him out for being lazy for not doing his own research on that before putting it in his speech.

(Btw, he and others fail to realize the bill is the exact same wording as an executive order from years ago that is already being enforced. So basically, it's a giant nothing burger)

Well one thing is for sure, god is on his side 😂

I can see the perspective of both people here. Butker was making the case that ultra orthodox Catholicism is under attack and using all the evidence he could find - true or not. Ms. Schwartz felt Jews were being persecuted and interpreted Butker’s comments as false information against a bill that would have worked to protect Jews.

Both probably wrong and misled. I don’t think we should call either stupid because misinformation affects everyone.

Being outraged about something you don’t understand is arguably worse than misunderstanding the implications of a law

You mean those unmarried women with no kids? Weird LMAO

Unmarried women are a real issue in this country. 90% of them don’t even understand conditional hypotheticals

Surely you see how you're supporting my point.

You do understand Women have no authority in the Catholic Church right?

So shall we send the thread dedicated to celebrating Butker's football accomplishments to DC?