ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs NFL trade watch (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=324629)

keg in kc 08-31-2019 01:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla (Post 14416674)
What round pick will we get for Hyde?

I'm thinking the only round thing we'll get for Hyde is some m&m's, or maybe a tootsie roll pop. Slice of provolone?

OnTheWarpath15 08-31-2019 07:09 AM

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr"><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Seahawks?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Seahawks</a> are making a strong push for Jadeveon Clowney. <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Texans?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Texans</a></p>&mdash; patrick (@PatDStat) <a href="https://twitter.com/PatDStat/status/1167757474675474433?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 31, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

pugsnotdrugs19 08-31-2019 07:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath15 (Post 14416852)
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr"><a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Seahawks?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Seahawks</a> are making a strong push for Jadeveon Clowney. <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Texans?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Texans</a></p>&mdash; patrick (@PatDStat) <a href="https://twitter.com/PatDStat/status/1167757474675474433?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 31, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

I don’t really get this for Seattle.

If he costs about the same as Clark, why didn’t they just keep Clark? He’s been a more productive, steady player anyways.

EDIT: I suppose it depends what they have to give up for Clowney. It very well may be less than what we gave for Clark, but, they won’t be able to extend Clowney until after the season.

O.city 08-31-2019 07:27 AM

Maybe they like clowney better?

staylor26 08-31-2019 07:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 14416854)
I don’t really get this for Seattle.

If he costs about the same as Clark, why didn’t they just keep Clark? He’s been a more productive, steady player anyways.

EDIT: I suppose it depends what they have to give up for Clowney. It very well may be less than what we gave for Clark, but, they won’t be able to extend Clowney until after the season.

It seems like a bit of a panic move after Reed got suspended. Their DL is ass without both Clark and Reed.

pugsnotdrugs19 08-31-2019 07:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 14416859)
Maybe they like clowney better?

Look at this here: https://twitter.com/matthammondshow/...909460481?s=21

Something like that wouldn’t show up on any stat sheet, but it’s a pretty big deal.

staylor26 08-31-2019 07:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 14416859)
Maybe they like clowney better?

I mean, maybe they are that dumb. They did take Collier at 29 and Metcalf in the 2nd.

Their personnel department has been absolutely terrible, so I wouldn’t put it past them.

O.city 08-31-2019 07:32 AM

I mean it’s ok to have a different opinion

I’d imagine it’s more that they see a scenario where they can get some value

O.city 08-31-2019 07:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19 (Post 14416864)
Look at this here: https://twitter.com/matthammondshow/...909460481?s=21

Something like that wouldn’t show up on any stat sheet, but it’s a pretty big deal.

Yeah, Chris Jones had a bad penalty in the afc champ Gabe too

Pretty big deal

staylor26 08-31-2019 07:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 14416868)
Yeah, Chris Jones had a bad penalty in the afc champ Gabe too

Pretty big deal

Lol wut?

Jones didn’t do shit. It was an awful penalty.

O.city 08-31-2019 07:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 14416870)
Lol wut?

Jones didn’t do shit. It was an awful penalty.

Exactly

As you always say, context matters

I don’t know what clowney penalties are so to say it was a big deal is a quick jump

staylor26 08-31-2019 07:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 14416872)
Exactly

As you always say, context matters

I don’t know what clowney penalties are so to say it was a big deal is a quick jump

Sure, but we’re not talking about 1 penalty. It was 4. I guess it’s possible that they were all bullshit, but looks like a pattern to me.

O.city 08-31-2019 07:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 14416873)
Sure, but we’re not talking about 1 penalty. It was 4. I guess it’s possible that they were all bullshit, but looks like a pattern to me.

Of course it does, but without knowing I won’t comment

Dante84 08-31-2019 07:38 AM

.

staylor26 08-31-2019 07:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 14416875)
Of course it does

I don’t know if this is sarcasm?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:30 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.