ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Science Space Exploration megathread (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=284057)

MagicHef 01-31-2021 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kstater (Post 15518470)
I get being pissed at FAA, but if it’s just paperwork, why aren’t they (Space X) treating every test as a new bird?

They did consider SN9 as a new bird, but had to re-consider it as a new bird again after they swapped some engines, even though it had not flown. It seems they didn’t know this until after it was on the pad and ready to fly.

*Just my understanding and may be wrong*

Donger 01-31-2021 03:35 PM

https://arstechnica.com/science/2021...-and-starship/

Donger 02-01-2021 02:26 PM

https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/wp-c...-29-42-365.jpg

Hydrae 02-01-2021 04:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Donger (Post 15521738)

Elon Musk, serving up SciFi pictures in real life! That is so very cool.

Donger 02-01-2021 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hydrae (Post 15521978)
Elon Musk, serving up SciFi pictures in real life! That is so very cool.

Fingers crossed that SN9 flies tomorrow, but isn't SN10 kinda in close proximity?

DaFace 02-01-2021 04:15 PM

This is neat. Someone want to chip in and pay for me to take a ride? :)

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Announcing the first commercial astronaut mission to orbit Earth aboard Dragon → <a href="https://t.co/MbESvnakAD">https://t.co/MbESvnakAD</a> <a href="https://t.co/ukLsjFfRjk">pic.twitter.com/ukLsjFfRjk</a></p>&mdash; SpaceX (@SpaceX) <a href="https://twitter.com/SpaceX/status/1356354006814060547?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 1, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

MagicHef 02-01-2021 04:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Donger (Post 15522000)
Fingers crossed that SN9 flies tomorrow, but isn't SN10 kinda in close proximity?

They seem to have a level of confidence that I'm not sure I'd share.

DaFace 02-01-2021 04:24 PM

You can enter to win a trip on Dragon here if you are in the mood to donate:

https://www.prizeo.com/campaigns/l/i...n=Inspiration4

Donger 02-01-2021 04:40 PM

Ugh:

https://www.theverge.com/2021/1/29/2...tion-elon-musk

SpaceX’s first high-altitude test flight of its Starship rocket, which launched successfully but exploded in a botched landing attempt in December, violated the terms of its Federal Aviation Administration test license, according to two people familiar with the incident. Both the landing explosion and license violation prompted a formal investigation by the FAA, driving regulators to put extra scrutiny on Elon Musk’s hasty Mars rocket test campaign.

unlurking 02-01-2021 07:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Donger (Post 15522089)
Ugh:

https://www.theverge.com/2021/1/29/2...tion-elon-musk

SpaceX’s first high-altitude test flight of its Starship rocket, which launched successfully but exploded in a botched landing attempt in December, violated the terms of its Federal Aviation Administration test license, according to two people familiar with the incident. Both the landing explosion and license violation prompted a formal investigation by the FAA, driving regulators to put extra scrutiny on Elon Musk’s hasty Mars rocket test campaign.

Yeah, these theories confuse me. Did they assume SpaceX could guarantee a landing? Doesn't make sense to me. Also saw someone saying it was because wreckage was found up to 4km away. Which is well within the 5mi exclusion zone. So again, doesn't make sense. I don't doubt that the FAA may believe they violated something, but the complete lack of transparency is annoying as ****.

EDIT: The FAA considering SN9 a completely new vehicle after two engines were swapped out makes the most sense to me, but I really haven't been paying much attention.

MagicHef 02-01-2021 07:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by unlurking (Post 15522343)
Yeah, these theories confuse me. Did they assume SpaceX could guarantee a landing? Doesn't make sense to me. Also saw someone saying it was because wreckage was found up to 4km away. Which is well within the 5mi exclusion zone. So again, doesn't make sense. I don't doubt that the FAA may believe they violated something, but the complete lack of transparency is annoying as ****.

EDIT: The FAA considering SN9 a completely new vehicle after two engines were swapped out makes the most sense to me, but I really haven't been paying much attention.

I also read a theory that the SN8 flight did not conform to the approved envelope. Not sure which theory, if any, is correct.

unlurking 02-02-2021 08:30 AM

SpaceX has a green light from the FAA, and Starship SN9 is free to fly

https://arstechnica.com/science/2021...pe-sn9-to-fly/

Molitoth 02-02-2021 10:50 AM

TODAY IS GOING TO BE THE DAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I CAN FEEL IT

Donger 02-02-2021 01:17 PM

Seeing some tank farm activity, fellas!

MagicHef 02-02-2021 01:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Donger (Post 15521738)

Any idea where the landing area is in relation to this picture?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:18 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.