ChiefsPlanet
Page 25 of 27 « First 1521222324 25 2627
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Chiefs are signing Orlando Scandrick (1-year, $1.5 million) (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=316867)

Titty Meat 10-09-2018 10:38 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 13802104)
I already said neither, preferably. Learn to read.
Yeah and I'm saying pick one pillowbiter.

Sassy Squatch 10-09-2018 10:40 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Titty Meat (Post 13802121)
Yeah and I'm saying pick one pillowbiter.
Nah. Scandrick has been playing above his talent level and Peters is who we thought he was. I don't really want either of them.

htismaqe 10-09-2018 10:42 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Titty Meat (Post 13802100)
Is absolutely isn't. Peters got burned sometimes every CB does. For his career hes had one of the lowest passing ratings against him.
Actually, that's not true.

Quote:
11. Marcus Peters, Los Angeles Rams

There is no doubt that Peters is gifted. But those gifts bring him into the boom or bust status. Over three seasons he has 34 pass breakups and 21 interceptions. He also has given up 15 touchdowns. Last season in Kansas City he played 14 games. In those games he had 42 solo tackles, five interceptions, nine passes defended and four forced fumbles.

The question this season in Los Angeles is will he be the more focused for a boom, or lose it and be a bust?
https://www.fakepigskin.com/2018/09/...18-nfl-season/

He gives up a ton of TDs, which drives up opponent passer ratings.

Titty Meat 10-09-2018 10:47 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 13802139)
Actually, that's not true.



https://www.fakepigskin.com/2018/09/...18-nfl-season/

He gives up a ton of TDs, which drives up opponent passer ratings.

"And among cornerbacks with 1,500 coverage snaps or more since his rookie season, Peters has the lowest opponent passer rating allowed at 65.2, per Monson. He's a splash play waiting to happen."

A ball hawk is what the defense is currently missing. I get why they traded him though.

staylor26 10-09-2018 10:47 AM
Given that Peters was never going to sign an extension here, I’ll take Scanrdick for a stopgap and the picks.

Looking back it was the right move as much as it pained me to lose Peters.

Titty Meat 10-09-2018 10:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 13802163)
Given that Peters was never going to sign an extension here, I’ll take Scanrdick for a stopgap and the picks.

Looking back it was the right move as much as it pained me to lose Peters.
Where did you see he wouldn't re-sign? Hadnt heard that but after his meltdown in NY theres no way is give that guy a bunch of money.

TEX 10-09-2018 10:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 13802163)
Given that Peters was never going to sign an extension here, I’ll take Scanrdick for a stopgap and the picks.

Looking back it was the right move as much as it pained me to lose Peters.
I completely agree. Dude has been a pleasant surprise - and not just that he doesn't suck, but rather that he can play. He's head and shoulders above David Amerson.

RunKC 10-09-2018 10:53 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Titty Meat (Post 13802102)
Stop dodging and answer the question then. You taking Peters or Scandrick?
Right now Scandrick

staylor26 10-09-2018 10:57 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Titty Meat (Post 13802174)
Where did you see he wouldn't re-sign? Hadnt heard that but after his meltdown in NY theres no way is give that guy a bunch of money.
I’m pretty sure he asked for a trade.

booger 10-09-2018 10:57 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iowanian (Post 13802069)
Scandrick has been doing a better job.


I don't think corners have been the problem in pass defense, it's been poor coverage over the top by the safeties. Parker is routinely late to his spot.
He has and his willingness to hit and tackle well is a welcome addition. IMO they have no choice but to keep giving Lucas and Watts more snaps. You have to give all these young bucks snaps good or bad that’s how they grow and they have to reward them with the growth they’ve made

Kiimo 10-09-2018 11:09 AM
I was very against the Peters trade but the more I hear about it and the more I see Scandrick making plays welp...it's fun to admit you were wrong when the proof of it is the Chiefs succeeding.

Pitt Gorilla 10-09-2018 11:21 AM
I'm glad that Scandrick has played well enough that this is a question. Now we need someone to take Berry's contract off our hands.

Buehler445 10-09-2018 11:23 AM
Yeah. This isn't about Scandrick being better than Peters. This is about Peters being non-compatible with the team and finding a suitable replacement.

Scandrick is doing OK. I wasn't as down on him when this place was readying the pitchforks and I'm not going to pretend that baiting Bortles is transferrable to big games.

Scandrick isn't a disaster. Amerson was.

booger 10-09-2018 11:24 AM
Ward really played well as a gunner the first two games with 3 tackles in the first game against Denver. I don’t think Tremon Smith did anything wrong they just wanted to get a live look at Ward and it’s a numbers game with the damn game day inactives

Marcellus 10-09-2018 11:26 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Titty Meat (Post 13802000)
Alex Smith was rated ahead of Rodgers last year.

So yeah PFF is reeruned.
Alex Smith was a better player than Rodgers last year.

These aren't career grades they are a snapshot in time.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:07 PM.
Page 25 of 27 « First 1521222324 25 2627
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.