ChiefsPlanet
Page 24 of 31 « First 1420212223 24 25262728 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs NFLPA Survey: Clark rated with an F- (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=352547)

Stryker 03-02-2024 12:10 AM
It was the same exact vote last time YAWN! :whackit::whackit::whackit:

Stryker 03-02-2024 12:11 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pepe Silvia (Post 17424883)
Who filled out these surveys? Mike Florio and Kyle Brandt?
True that! LMAOLMAOLMAO

Hammock Parties 03-02-2024 12:14 AM
Clark and his lieutenants consistentl make balla ass decisions for their balla ass franchise.

We don't need no stinking couches.

MarkDavis'Haircut 03-02-2024 08:53 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by InChiefsHeaven (Post 17421038)
Oh, OK. I guess. Just seems weird that the team that has been the undisputed king of the ****ing universe these last 6 seasons have players, apparently a lOT of them, willing to give them an average grade of F- on ANYTHING.

Whatever man. Millionaires bitching about billionaires. ****ing practice locker room vs. gameday locker room. Shut the **** up already...sheeesh...
It is just what it is.

NFL players exist in a different world of thinking.

MarkDavis'Haircut 03-02-2024 09:32 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 17422439)
According to Mitchell Schwartz and Geoff Schwartz the facilities almost never comes into play. Imagine the Raiders when they played in Oakland trying to get FA players with their facility situation.

He said something like this in order-

$$
$$
Winning Franchise
Coaching
Friends on the team
City
Al famously overpaid for players his last decade in Oakland and thus signed guys. Unless, they are ring chasing, most players want the largest paycheck.

MarkDavis'Haircut 03-02-2024 09:33 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katipan (Post 17422502)
Thank goodness its changed.

Watching you guys justify your bloodlust from the couch was icky.
Acting like the players aren't paid royalty wages for their services.

They are not bleeding out for 30k. If they don't like it, there are other professions.

RunKC 03-02-2024 09:46 AM
People on Twitter are pissed that we are always low on cash spending, like that has really made the difference

philfree 03-02-2024 11:26 AM
So all the young guys on the Chiefs who just won back to back SBs voted their Boss an F? LOL I don't believe that for a second.

Pasta Little Brioni 03-02-2024 11:55 AM
....and Micro Penner/Condoleezza were voted an A and Denver is a train wreck with zero hope. It means Jack shit.

IowaHawkeyeChief 03-02-2024 03:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThaVirus (Post 17424811)
LMAO

That’s hilarious. I had no idea.. and dude was arguing with me about the team paying for most of the cost of the rings lol
Hey dumb****... That's what they get taxed for the ring. Happens at every company. I've won company trips and get 1099'd for the trip. My company bonuses me up for taxes, but the Chiefs can't do that with a salary cap.

trndobrd 03-02-2024 04:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThaVirus (Post 17424811)
LMAO

That’s hilarious. I had no idea.. and dude was arguing with me about the team paying for most of the cost of the rings lol

Click through Katipan's link...rings are expensive enough to incur a tax hit of $11k. More details here. https://www.sportingnews.com/us/nfl/...w0hwglduwk8dt6

The point 'dude' was getting at... if the survey included quality of SB ring, 31 teams would be receive an 'F'. One team would receive an 'A'. Given the choice between a big locker room and free child care or a SB ring... most players would take the SB.

ThaVirus 03-02-2024 04:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by IowaHawkeyeChief (Post 17425482)
Hey dumb****... That's what they get taxed for the ring. Happens at every company. I've won company trips and get 1099'd for the trip. My company bonuses me up for taxes, but the Chiefs can't do that with a salary cap.

Quote:
Originally Posted by trndobrd (Post 17425557)
Click through Katipan's link...rings are expensive enough to incur a tax hit of $11k. More details here. https://www.sportingnews.com/us/nfl/...w0hwglduwk8dt6



The point 'dude' was getting at... if the survey included quality of SB ring, 31 teams would be receive an 'F'. One team would receive an 'A'. Given the choice between a big locker room and free child care or a SB ring... most players would take the SB.

It’s a stupid ****ing point because players earn the Super Bowl ring.. and in the process, they make their organization a hell of a lot more money than the rings cost.

It’s not a flex.

stevieray 03-02-2024 07:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThaVirus (Post 17425564)
It’s a stupid ****ing point because players earn the Super Bowl ring.. and in the process, they make their organization a hell of a lot more money than the rings cost.

It’s not a flex.
It's a business.

They earned a paycheck for playing, they get the ring for winning.

ThaVirus 03-02-2024 07:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by stevieray (Post 17425797)
they get the ring for winning.
In other words: they earned it.

Glad we can all agree.

Hammock Parties 03-02-2024 07:44 PM
Interesting how some posters think the players should get free shit just because.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:03 AM.
Page 24 of 31 « First 1420212223 24 25262728 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.