ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Let's talk about the 49ers (Super Bowl Edition) (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=328296)

Eleazar 01-24-2020 10:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DRM08 (Post 14749091)
I don’t care about the betting line. 49ers are very talented with strong coaching. So I expect it to be a tough game regardless of the gambling line. Chiefs will need to bring their A game and we will see if they show up ready to play.

On paper this looks like it could be the best matchup in recent memory in a Super Bowl, it's strength vs strength. It should be a close game and maybe a shootout, probably very entertaining for everyone.

Really, there haven't been a lot of great Super Bowls recently.

The Rams never got off the bus last year. The Nick Foles game was entertaining, but still - that was a declining Patriots team being beaten by a backup QB. The year before that, Falcons embarrassingly blow a huge lead. The year before that Denver soundly defeats a Panthers team while Cam Newton embarrasses himself.

The last really good Super Bowl was probably when New England beat Seattle, but even then you have Russell Wilson throwing a pick on 2nd and goal from the 1 being the story of the game.

I think this year the league has a real shot at a great game, great storylines, and teams that will both show up.

pugsnotdrugs19 01-24-2020 10:16 AM

Chiefs stacked the box on 12% of snaps against Tennessee. That’s a total myth that they loaded up on Henry at any extreme measure.

I expect a similar plan early on cause the KC DL is going to win the LOS in this matchup. Some just don’t realize that yet.

FringeNC 01-24-2020 10:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 14749117)
Seattle was in tatters as well.

For all the talk about the vaunted NFC, I didn't see much in the way of greatness there. The Packers were the weirdest, softest 13-3 team I've seen since...well the Chiefs 13-3 team in 2003. Brees was so clearly on fumes down the stretch (same as last year) that the Saints simply weren't as good as their record. The Seahawks had been decimated by injury and damn near lost to a 40 year old man playing on a torn hamstring. The Vikings had Kurt Cousins - the same guy that lost to Matt Moore.

I just don't understand this belief that the NFC was some savage hell-conference.

Packers had a negative net yards per play (O-D). To go 13-3 with that indicates a lot of luck. On the flip side, Dallas somehow managed to dominate the line of scrimmage and have a .500 record.

Hern 01-24-2020 10:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rabblerouser (Post 14749128)
But we went to NE and straight up beat the Pats.
The Dolphins straight up beat the Pats.
Tennessee straight up punched both the Ravens and the Pats in the mouth
Bill O'Brien is Bill O'Brien and will ALWAYS go full reerun. The Texans were lucky Josh Allen went full fetal. The Texans were lucky Buffalo didn't win.

The Chiefs have proven their mettle over the last 8 games. The 49ers needed help to get the #1 seed over Seattle. If the officials had called that game correctly - or if they had even REVIEWED that call (it was under 2 minutes), Seattle would've had a bye week to get healthy, and it's possible that the 49ers wouldn't have made it past them the third time, either.

If Seattle would’ve won They wouldn’t of had a bye.

#1-GB
#2-NO
#3-Seattle
#4-Philly
#5-SF
#6-Minn

pugsnotdrugs19 01-24-2020 10:23 AM

The NFC has been overrated all season. Two of their best 5 teams either lost or almost lost to the Matt Moore led Chiefs. Baltimore blew the doors off of Seattle on the road and beat SF.

KC, SF, and BAL were really the only teams that ever seemed to have a real shot at winning this when it started a few weeks ago.

DRM08 01-24-2020 10:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hern (Post 14749151)
If Seattle would’ve won They wouldn’t of had a bye.

#1-GB
#2-NO
#3-Seattle
#4-Philly
#5-SF
#6-Minn

Pretty crazy how much difference that one game meant in the standings. Wild stuff!

Hern 01-24-2020 10:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DRM08 (Post 14749166)
Pretty crazy how much difference that one game meant in the standings. Wild stuff!


Right!!!

Ultimately the 9ers winning screwed the Saints more than it screwed the Hawks.

rabblerouser 01-24-2020 10:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hern (Post 14749151)
If Seattle would’ve won They wouldn’t of had a bye.

#1-GB
#2-NO
#3-Seattle
#4-Philly
#5-SF
#6-Minn

Gotchya.

DJ's left nut 01-24-2020 10:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hern (Post 14749170)
Right!!!

Ultimately the 9ers winning screwed the Saints more than it screwed the Hawks.

No question.

Brees NEEDED that week off in a big way. Just as Brady did.

Both of those guys were clearly working with dead arms and a week without practice could've helped them a lot.

Credit is due to the 49ers in that regard - by winning that game they effectively torpedoed the ceiling of their biggest hurdle. Even had NO won that game, they were done the following week. They needed more than Brees had to offer and the only thing that could've changed that was giving Brees some time to recharge.

The 49ers probably still make the NFCCG but they end up playing @ NO instead of at home vs. a team that had a clear matchup advantage against in GB.

They didn't back into it - they won the game they had to. But man it took some weird shit for it to happen and in the process the myth of the dominant NFC was destroyed, IMO.

DRM08 01-24-2020 10:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hern (Post 14749170)
Right!!!

Ultimately the 9ers winning screwed the Saints more than it screwed the Hawks.

Yep. Saints lost the bye week and then got stuck playing Minnesota in the wild card round. Vikings are a team that seems to have Voodoo magic against the Saints.

Ming the Merciless 01-24-2020 10:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hern (Post 14742342)
Please rabble i beg you to relax. Your blood pressure will rose if you don’t.

I’m over the stats convo. You guys got better towards the end of the year because of “change” we got worse towards the end because of injuries. Who cares. All that means nothing in 2 weeks. Move on. On to the next subject.


MIC'D UP


https://voca.ro/ntwhcfvCWsm <-- click here to listen


<iframe src="https://vocaroo.com/embed/ntwhcfvCWsm" width="300" height="60" frameborder="0"></iframe>
View on Vocaroo >>




x

A8bil 01-24-2020 10:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 14749067)
Everyone talking about blocking up the 9ers front 4, justifiably so, they're good.

But do the 9ers have the interior OL to block Chris Jones?

Questionable. Garland has gotten better in place of Richburg, but I would agree that is a point of vulnerability.

Coochie liquor 01-24-2020 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deebo19 (Post 14749079)
Do you guys promise to play goaline defense like you did against Henry? With a single deep safety, whatever his name is, and linebackers shadowing our RB?

Please please please do!

We’re not playing anything, except for with your emotions you absolute imbecile. They Chiefs will be playing the 40 winers. And you fools better keep your box of tissue and your Faders jerseys close by. Cuz this Chiefs team is gonna embarrass their opponent to the point you’ll all be Faders fans AGAIN by the time the game ends.

TomBarndtsTwin 01-24-2020 10:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by All22 (Post 14748983)
Made in response to someone discounting the accomplishment of making the Superbowl in your first healthy season as a starter.

If your team starts making Superbowls regularly you'll learn that accomplishments without Superbowl wins mean nothing.

Oh, good god. Stop with the high and mighty act.

YOUR team hasn’t been making Super Bowls ‘regularly’ since the 80’s. :rolleyes:

The Ronald Reagan era is over. You’re not the Pats. Get over yourself.

Hern 01-24-2020 10:51 AM

Serious question not regarding the superbowl...

How long do you guys think you guys have this superbowl window open? Looking at your cap situation, KC is around $15 mill under? That’s without paying Mahomes. I asked in the Mahomes thread how much will he realistically make yearly, answer was about $40-$45 mill a year.

Do you guys feel that with him making so much will affect the way this team is built? Obviously pieces will have to go.

Side note: let’s see how many times I get called idiot for asking a simple question. Lol.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:40 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.