ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Science Who will produce the first mass Covid vaccine? (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=333049)

Bugeater 08-16-2020 08:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rain Man (Post 15117135)
My wife and I were chatting the other day, and she expressed concern that antivaxxers would ruin the effectiveness of vaccines. My response was that I don't care that much as long as I'm vaccinated. If people enjoy getting sick, and they only infect other people who enjoy getting sick, then the only downside for me is hearing their annoying coughing and dying when I'm out on the town.

She did bring up the good point, though, that if people have permanent medical issues as a result, they could drag down the economy. I guess that's a good point.

Nothing ruins a night on the town like a bunch of people coughing and dying. I hate that shit.

O.city 08-16-2020 09:27 PM

Hopefully it’s moderna
If their RNA vaccine is successful it changes the whole ballgame on vaccines and their development

Rain Man 08-16-2020 09:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 15117232)
Hopefully it’s moderna
If their RNA vaccine is successful it changes the whole ballgame on vaccines and their development

I know nothing about that. Please enlighten me.

I voted for them due to their fast jump out of the starting gate, and I figure if they've got the NIH in their corner they're onto something. But I'm also cautious that they've never put a product to market. I worry a little bit that they'll turn out to be a shadow puppet that makes the CEO rich. My finger keeps hovering over the 'sell' button on the small amount of their stock that I have.

I also have stock in Editas, on a whole different topic. Again, I know nothing about what they're doing, but gene editing seems to be a potential game changer. If what they're doing works, then the world will be a different place.

oldman 08-16-2020 11:06 PM

I can't say how I know, but I'm pretty confident it'll be one of the European companies.

Pitt Gorilla 08-16-2020 11:18 PM

I'm guessing the NBA. They're, apparently, moving testing science forward faster than anyone else.

KChiefs1 08-17-2020 01:09 AM

China

This has been their plan from the beginning.

loochy 08-17-2020 05:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lewdog (Post 15117188)
Q

IBIO is worth mentioning twice! Tom will take us to the promised land!

loochy 08-17-2020 05:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oldman (Post 15117329)
I can't say how I know, but I'm pretty confident it'll be one of the European companies.

Right. Russia IS European, after all.

displacedinMN 08-17-2020 07:17 AM

I voted moderna because my wifes company is supplying the plastics to them. doing very well this year.

tatorhog 08-17-2020 08:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lewdog (Post 15117098)
IBIO

Doesn't seem like there is a strong backing for them. I bought in at 80cents and rode it up to 6.21 when I bailed. It cratered since then though, and continues to trickle down in value. I think last I checked it was around 2.60-ish.

The IBM Watson thing was a cool step for them same with getting added to the Russell 2000 and 3000, but I don't think they are a true player.

O.city 08-17-2020 08:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rain Man (Post 15117248)
I know nothing about that. Please enlighten me.

I voted for them due to their fast jump out of the starting gate, and I figure if they've got the NIH in their corner they're onto something. But I'm also cautious that they've never put a product to market. I worry a little bit that they'll turn out to be a shadow puppet that makes the CEO rich. My finger keeps hovering over the 'sell' button on the small amount of their stock that I have.

I also have stock in Editas, on a whole different topic. Again, I know nothing about what they're doing, but gene editing seems to be a potential game changer. If what they're doing works, then the world will be a different place.

It’s pretty technical but basically they aren’t broken down as quickly as a dna vector and are more efficient at eliciting an immune response. Plus they would have huge ramifications in cancer treatment. You can also use a lot less “material” to get antigen recognition iirc

For short

I could send you some more detailed stuff that’s over my head if you wanna read it

O.city 08-17-2020 08:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oldman (Post 15117329)
I can't say how I know, but I'm pretty confident it'll be one of the European companies.

Care to elaborate?

Maybe via pm?

saphojunkie 08-17-2020 10:02 AM

If you want to say who will produce the first PUBLICLY AVAILABLE vaccine that is approved in both the US and EU with an efficacy rate of greater than 50%... we have a debate.

Otherwise, it will be: Russia, Oxford, Moderna, in that order. Unless there is some bullshit rushing of Moderna to be out by the election, which is completely possible.

saphojunkie 08-17-2020 10:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rain Man (Post 15117135)
My wife and I were chatting the other day, and she expressed concern that antivaxxers would ruin the effectiveness of vaccines. My response was that I don't care that much as long as I'm vaccinated. If people enjoy getting sick, and they only infect other people who enjoy getting sick, then the only downside for me is hearing their annoying coughing and dying when I'm out on the town.

She did bring up the good point, though, that if people have permanent medical issues as a result, they could drag down the economy. I guess that's a good point.

Was having this conversation yesterday. There aren't enough antivaxxers to make a dent. What to worry about is regular people who turn into covid antivaxxers. Not only for the health and safety, but because it affects the economy. I won't necessarily be first in line to get a vaccine, as they should improve over time and I would like to see the safety data first. But, if I had to choose right now, take the first vaccine available or never take one at all, I'm rolling up my sleeve.

Rain Man 08-17-2020 10:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 15117480)
It’s pretty technical but basically they aren’t broken down as quickly as a dna vector and are more efficient at eliciting an immune response. Plus they would have huge ramifications in cancer treatment. You can also use a lot less “material” to get antigen recognition iirc

For short

I could send you some more detailed stuff that’s over my head if you wanna read it

Meh, I wouldn't understand the more detailed stuff unless they explain it to me like I'm five. I'll take your word for it that it's good.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:24 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.