ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Food and Drink -- Let's talk about counting calories & routine (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=314659)

Simply Red 04-04-2018 10:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Plow (Post 13502729)
Wasn't planning on exercising yesterday, but ended up getting to go.

Goal of 2,020 calories; ate 1,654 calories; exercised away 746 calories for a net intake of 908 with 1,112 left over.

I'd really prefer to be around 450-600 left over, but my kids ate all the food before I got through the line.

Never mind that bolded part - In my opinion.

Stewie 04-04-2018 03:07 PM

JFC! There are a bunch of dumbasses in this thread.

From the FDA:

Why 2000 Calories?

When developing the new food label a base for % Daily Values was needed — a new feature to help customers see at a glance the fat and other nutrient content of a certain food. A mathematically simple 2,000 calorie-a-day diet was chosen so that consumers could easily calculate the Daily Values needed for their own diets.

This is the amount of total calories per day that a moderately active adult female (weighing approximately 132 pounds) would need to maintain her weight. However, if you do not fit this description, your caloric needs will vary. It is important, therefore, that you adapt the new food label to make the best choices for your own diet.

Hmm... What's 132 x 15? 1980 calories. 15 calories per day per pound of weight is a good estimate for maintenance. A 200 lb. person needs 3000 calories to maintain their weight.

A 132 lb. woman that consumes less than 1300 calories is considered under nourished. A 200 lb. man that consumes less than 2000 calories is also under nourished. That's fine for a weight loss plan, but detrimental as a "normal" intake of calories.

BTW, if you eat at restaurants you're probably consuming way more calories than you think. There have been several lawsuits brought against food chains that claim "low cal"... but when tested there was nothing low cal about it.

Mr. Plow 04-05-2018 08:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stewie (Post 13503220)
JFC! There are a bunch of dumbasses in this thread.

From the FDA:

Why 2000 Calories?

When developing the new food label a base for % Daily Values was needed — a new feature to help customers see at a glance the fat and other nutrient content of a certain food. A mathematically simple 2,000 calorie-a-day diet was chosen so that consumers could easily calculate the Daily Values needed for their own diets.

This is the amount of total calories per day that a moderately active adult female (weighing approximately 132 pounds) would need to maintain her weight. However, if you do not fit this description, your caloric needs will vary. It is important, therefore, that you adapt the new food label to make the best choices for your own diet.

Hmm... What's 132 x 15? 1980 calories. 15 calories per day per pound of weight is a good estimate for maintenance. A 200 lb. person needs 3000 calories to maintain their weight.

A 132 lb. woman that consumes less than 1300 calories is considered under nourished. A 200 lb. man that consumes less than 2000 calories is also under nourished. That's fine for a weight loss plan, but detrimental as a "normal" intake of calories.

BTW, if you eat at restaurants you're probably consuming way more calories than you think. There have been several lawsuits brought against food chains that claim "low cal"... but when tested there was nothing low cal about it.

So, what you are saying is that - for myself (225 lbs.) - in order to maintain my weight at 225 lbs I should be consuming 3,375 calories per day (225 x 15). Is that correct? I'm new to this whole eating better, exercising, and being more healthy deal so I'm learning.

BigRedChief 04-05-2018 08:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Plow (Post 13502729)
Wasn't planning on exercising yesterday, but ended up getting to go.

Goal of 2,020 calories; ate 1,654 calories; exercised away 746 calories for a net intake of 908 with 1,112 left over.

I'd really prefer to be around 450-600 left over, but my kids ate all the food before I got through the line.

That my fitness pal app is for shit when trying to put your exercise into your net intake of calories. I can put in the exercise and its there but doesnt become a part of thenet calories for the day. This negative calorie intake or whatever they call it is the shit. Rant over.

Exercised 1006 calories which were not included in my total and I still had 863 calories left for the day.

Mr. Plow 04-05-2018 08:41 AM

My day yesterday was 2,020 calorie goal; 1,957 food; 650 exercise; total calories used 1,307.

BigRedChief 04-05-2018 08:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Plow (Post 13504080)
So, what you are saying is that - for myself (225 lbs.) - in order to maintain my weight at 225 lbs I should be consuming 3,375 calories per day (225 x 15). Is that correct? I'm new to this whole eating better, exercising, and being more healthy deal so I'm learning.

From what I've read, the government recommendation of 15 calories is way too high. Most others say 10 calories.

Mr. Plow 04-05-2018 08:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRedChief (Post 13504083)
That my fitness pal app is for shit when trying to put your exercise into your net intake of calories. I can put in the exercise and its there but doesnt become a part of thenet calories for the day. This negative calorie intake or whatever they call it is the shit. Rant over.

Exercised 1006 calories which were not included in my total and I still had 863 calories left for the day.

It doesn't add it to your overall daily calorie goal. It gives you your daily goal (mine is 2,020 calories). Then, it subtracts your food and adds your exercise.

Mine for yesterday looks like this

Goal......Food....Exer.....Net
2,020 - 1,957 + 650 = 713

Simply Red 04-05-2018 09:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Plow (Post 13504094)
It doesn't add it to your overall daily calorie goal. It gives you your daily goal (mine is 2,020 calories). Then, it subtracts your food and adds your exercise.

Mine for yesterday looks like this

Goal......Food....Exer.....Net
2,020 - 1,957 + 650 = 713


Good for you buddy! keep it up!

Frosty 04-05-2018 09:24 AM

Had a good time yesterday. Ham and eggs in the morning, a small popcorn without extra grease at the movie and lunch/dinner at Costa Vida (which turned out to be almost 2000 calories according to their website - holy shit!) and some random munchies at night. Weight was 222.4 this morning.

Down day today so most of that should drop off.

Simply Red 04-05-2018 06:52 PM

apparently I'm only going to lose 3lbs - I've not gone above 1,200 cals in 10 days - not sure what the deal is. I was expecting 5lbs by now.

BigRedChief 04-05-2018 07:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Plow (Post 13504094)
It doesn't add it to your overall daily calorie goal. It gives you your daily goal (mine is 2,020 calories). Then, it subtracts your food and adds your exercise.

Mine for yesterday looks like this

Goal......Food....Exer.....Net
2,020 - 1,957 + 650 = 713

so it only adds in the exercise if it needs to keep you at your calorie goal?

Marcellus 04-05-2018 07:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Simply Red (Post 13504922)
apparently I'm only going to lose 3lbs - I've not gone above 1,200 cals in 10 days - not sure what the deal is. I was expecting 5lbs by now.

You drinking a lot of water or other zero calorie liquids to compensate for food cravings etc...?

Simply Red 04-05-2018 07:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 13504958)
You drinking a lot of water or other zero calorie liquids to compensate for food cravings etc...?

water yes.

Simply Red 04-05-2018 07:59 PM

but not for food cravings - I've always drank a shit load of water

Pasta Little Brioni 04-05-2018 08:05 PM

Lost 3 pounds earlier after a giant clean breaker was unearthed.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:27 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.