Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 15125837)

With all the goons in clown makeup despite the main villains seemingly being Riddler and Penguin and the dark story and Batman being on the younger side wonder if it's set in the same universe as Joakim Phoenix's Joker.

Originally Posted by Buehler445 (Post 15125451)

My take, that scene was really really good. Cat woman scene looked good.

Car looks bad, emo Bruce looks bad. Dude looks like he should be in a my chemical romance video.

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 15125852)

I believe they’re Penguin’s goons.

Originally Posted by sully1983 (Post 15125834)

**** Jonah Hill. That ugly fat POS was wanting $10 million to be the Riddler. Dano is superior in every way imo.



https://geektyrant.com/news/jonah-hi...king-half-that

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 15125837)

With all the goons in clown makeup despite the main villains seemingly being Riddler and Penguin and the dark story and Batman being on the younger side wonder if it's set in the same universe as Joakim Phoenix's Joker.

Originally Posted by Sure-Oz (Post 15125905)

That is crazy demand. You'd think Pattinson would get more but idk how this works reading that article

Originally Posted by cabletech94 (Post 15125853)

i immediately thought the crow reincarnate. but thats just me. seems solid.

Originally Posted by BWillie (Post 15125937)

Looks below avg trailer

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 15125954)

Lol wut?

The trailer is fantastic and they’ve only shot 25% of the movie.

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 15125928)

Pattinson is an unproven commodity in adult oriented films, especially to American audiences and a film that skews male, so most likely, he's taking a percentage of the backend and a smaller fee upfront.

Guys like Jonah Hill, who are established, veteran actors of multiple "winning" feature films don't need to sacrifice their careers for a role, which is what Hill would be doing if he lowered his salary for this film.

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 15125851)

:facepalm:

Matt Reeves, the film's director and screenwriter, has a great track record of successful films, from Cloverfield to the Planet of the Apes films and Batman films have been proven winners.

So why should Jonah Hill take less than his Quote for a film that's going to probably earn hundreds of millions of dollars for Warner Brothers? If he does take less, then moving forward, that's what he's worth because that's how Hollywood works.

How would he benefit from taking less money?

Originally Posted by sully1983 (Post 15126023)

Dane I hear ya man (and I love Matt Reeves' films) but I just can't stand Hill and his whole annoying schtick. I get you know Hollywood waaaay better than me or others on here but correct me if I'm wrong, a $10 million price tag would be more than what Pattinson is getting.
Again, maybe I just have an irrational hatred towards Jonah Hill. IMO Dano is the superior actor (killed it in There Will Be Blood & that Beach Boys film)

Originally Posted by Sure-Oz (Post 15125910)

Reeves said it's in it's own universe do probably not. I do agree it had that Joker feel to it