ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs NFL trade watch (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=324629)

sedated 08-26-2019 09:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 14409940)
Fescoe said he was texting with someone in the Chiefs front office and they went radio silent on the Patrick Peterson question.

That take was the epitome of idiocy. It was Tyreek straight up for PP, with the justification that KC is going all in this year. If they are going all in this year, they are not going to get rid of one of their top 3 players.

"Well do you want to get something for Tyreek now or possibly let him walk after the season?" Uhhh, that's what you do when you are going all in - you load up even if you will lose guys after the season.

Al Bundy 08-26-2019 09:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dante84 (Post 14408886)
Redskins were trying to trade for Tyreek.


<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Amazes me what people will just make up about me.<br><br>WAS was interested.</p>&mdash; Benjamin Allbright (@AllbrightNFL) <a href="https://twitter.com/AllbrightNFL/status/1165701107558936576?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 25, 2019</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

He put clown shoes on JP there.

Mecca 08-26-2019 09:11 AM

That's nice but Washington has an incompetent front office.

Dante84 08-26-2019 09:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Al Bundy (Post 14409993)
He put clown shoes on JP there.

JP is the most insane Twitter follow ever.

It's like if Jesse Pinkman had twitter, at his lowest point, and was a Chiefs fan.

He posts responses to people 24-48 hours after that person's tweet, with a rambling, emotional smorgasbord of punctuation and grammatical errors.

It's like he is using talk-to-text, but while being waterboarded.

O.city 08-26-2019 09:14 AM

Oh there's no way they'd trade a first for PP. Maybe a 2nd, but more likely a 3rd would be the most you'd move at this point.

O.city 08-26-2019 09:22 AM

If you're going all in on a season, why would you trade one of your 3 best players to get another player?

I doubt the Cards would really want to do the Tyreek deal anyway, they'd want picks.

RunKC 08-26-2019 09:29 AM

29 year old coming off PED’s and only playing 22 possible games before his deal runs out.

If Veach gives up our 2nd rd pick, the 49ers pick that will be a lot higher than what ours would have been, then Veach needs to be hit with a shovel and fired.

Buckweath 08-26-2019 10:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 14410010)
29 year old coming off PED’s and only playing 22 possible games before his deal runs out.

If Veach gives up our 2nd rd pick, the 49ers pick that will be a lot higher than what ours would have been, then Veach needs to be hit with a shovel and fired.

More like 26 games before his deal runs out.

And a mid 2nd round pick is fair value for Patrick Peterson taking everything into consideration.

TEX 08-26-2019 10:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buckweath (Post 14410063)
More like 26 games before his deal runs out.

And a mid 2nd round pick is fair value for Patrick Peterson taking everything into consideration.

I don't know. Maybe he's declining, thus the need for PED's? Or maybe since he got busted for taking them, he won't be as good not taking them :shrug:

I think I'd hold on to the pick as well.

arrowheadnation 08-26-2019 10:07 AM

I'm still working on willing the P2 deal into existence, but I'm just super slow.

Pitt Gorilla 08-26-2019 10:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buckweath (Post 14410063)
More like 26 games before his deal runs out.

And a mid 2nd round pick is fair value for Patrick Peterson taking everything into consideration.

Yeah, no.

New World Order 08-26-2019 10:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 14410010)
29 year old coming off PED’s and only playing 22 possible games before his deal runs out.

If Veach gives up our 2nd rd pick, the 49ers pick that will be a lot higher than what ours would have been, then Veach needs to be hit with a shovel and fired.

It's possible I guess.

Didn't Veach plan on sending Seattle a second rounder for Earl Thomas without extending him?

BlackOp 08-26-2019 12:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TEX (Post 14410070)
I don't know. Maybe he's declining, thus the need for PED's? Or maybe since he got busted for taking them, he won't be as good not taking them :shrug:

I think I'd hold on to the pick as well.

Didn't Peterson get torched by Hill last season?...

No high priced FAs over the age of 26...especially if draft picks are involved. Rarely do you see a return on the investment..

The only exception would be OL...

Mecca 08-26-2019 12:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackOp (Post 14410357)
Didn't Peterson get torched by Hill last season?...

No high priced FAs over the age of 26...especially if draft picks are involved.

Actually even though the Chiefs won, we played like garbage in that game.

Titty Meat 08-26-2019 02:38 PM

Dudes quoting Bon Fescoe now LMAO

Same guy who has Nick Athan on his show


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:09 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.